Advertisement

Throwing caution to the wind?

30 June 2006 by Keith Collantine

Safety Car, Monte-Carlo, 2005I was intruged to read on Autosport.co.uk that several Formule One drivers are asking for a change to the rules regarding safety cars.

They are asking for a change to the system common in American racing where lapped cars are allowed to pass the safety car and return to the rear of the field, gaining a lap back and allowing the leaders a clear shot at one another when racing resumes.

Although this may be good for racing, I am not convinced it would be good for F1.

Tags / / /

The calls for a change to the safety car rules have been prompted by the late-race safety car period in the Canadian Grand Prix where Alonso enjoyed a buffer of several lapped cars between himself and a pursuing Kimi Raikkonen. One of which was Jarno Trulli who dawdled at the start, holding Raikkonen up.

The argument in favour of it is obvious – it can help provoke actual on-track racing for position, which is something F1 sorely lacks.

But the counter-arguments are, to me, more persuasive. First, fairness: why should a leading driver who has had his time advantage over the opposition eroded by the safety car be further compromised by rules that allow the car behind a clear shot at him?

Second, fairness again: why should a driver who has fallen a lap behind the leader by being slow be allowed to gain a huge amount of time by unlaping himself?

Third, and most controversially, it presents too much of a temptation for race directors wishing the engineer a competitive race. Increasingly in American racing such as NASCAR, IRL and Champ Car we are seeing the use of ‘competition yellows’ – safety car periods ostensibly declared for safety reasons which are actually to bunch the field up and provoke racing.

I applaud efforts to improve the on-track sction in Formula One – but the best wasys to do this are by banning refuelling and severely restricting aerodynamics. Although F1 has much to learn from America in how it interacts with the fans and presents itself to the outside world, it should not hurry to adopt the more contrived aspects of American motor sport.

Related links:

Share: | | |

Read more: Articles in full | News

Leave a Reply

No swearing, insults, advertising or racial, sexual or similar discrimination allowed.

For more information see the F1Fanatic Comment Policy

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Has your comment not appeared? Try waiting a moment and then refresh the page. If it still doesn't appear and you've checked your comment meets the terms of our comment policy then contact F1Fanatic with the details of your comment so we can look into it.

If you wish to complain about a comment please contact the editor directly.