<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 vs NASCAR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: katie_S</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-4/#comment-872064</link>
		<dc:creator>katie_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-872064</guid>
		<description>Er, to all those people who think that F1 is all about the car and not about driver skill, go watch some footage of the driver view during a race. It&#039;s dizzying how fast those corners come up, and being so low to the ground the drivers can be almost blind of the approach, you forget that with the amazing technology that allows the cars to perform so well comes a need for an amazing level of skill and reaction time to control it. Honestly the speed at which these cars maneuver a non oval track in any weather is mind blowing. Seriously go watch footage from the driver camera. That is all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, to all those people who think that F1 is all about the car and not about driver skill, go watch some footage of the driver view during a race. It&#8217;s dizzying how fast those corners come up, and being so low to the ground the drivers can be almost blind of the approach, you forget that with the amazing technology that allows the cars to perform so well comes a need for an amazing level of skill and reaction time to control it. Honestly the speed at which these cars maneuver a non oval track in any weather is mind blowing. Seriously go watch footage from the driver camera. That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino Xuereb</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-4/#comment-678169</link>
		<dc:creator>Gino Xuereb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 07:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-678169</guid>
		<description>After reading these comments I thought I should have another look at NASCAR to see if I had made a poor judgment with regards to the merits of NASCAR and how it compares in some ways to formula1. I also did some reading on it from the net. As far as racing a car is concerned formula1 is at the top of the game and I believe one of the main reasons for this is that there is a constant push in formula1 to improve the car so that it is best placed to beat the rest. It&#039;s a constant struggle and the money and effort that is put in to achieve this goal is truly amazing. This kind of competition between teams and manufactures is what ensures formula1 stays at the top of motor sport. I would urge anyone who is a NASCAR fan to read formula1 news and stories and watch at least 5 qualifiers and grand prix and then make a judgment call. I would say it is also very important to listen to what the commentators are saying. If its the BBC you are watching you will be literally spoilt with excellent informed opinions from top experts from the game itself and top sports journalists.
After finding out everything I could about NASCAR and viewing this motor sport where possible(which isn&#039;t so readily available here in England) once again, I came to the very same decision as I had in the past. NASCAR is not of the same quality as formula1, not on any level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading these comments I thought I should have another look at NASCAR to see if I had made a poor judgment with regards to the merits of NASCAR and how it compares in some ways to formula1. I also did some reading on it from the net. As far as racing a car is concerned formula1 is at the top of the game and I believe one of the main reasons for this is that there is a constant push in formula1 to improve the car so that it is best placed to beat the rest. It&#8217;s a constant struggle and the money and effort that is put in to achieve this goal is truly amazing. This kind of competition between teams and manufactures is what ensures formula1 stays at the top of motor sport. I would urge anyone who is a NASCAR fan to read formula1 news and stories and watch at least 5 qualifiers and grand prix and then make a judgment call. I would say it is also very important to listen to what the commentators are saying. If its the BBC you are watching you will be literally spoilt with excellent informed opinions from top experts from the game itself and top sports journalists.<br />
After finding out everything I could about NASCAR and viewing this motor sport where possible(which isn&#8217;t so readily available here in England) once again, I came to the very same decision as I had in the past. NASCAR is not of the same quality as formula1, not on any level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gino</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-3/#comment-675517</link>
		<dc:creator>gino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 23:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-675517</guid>
		<description>F1 is exactly what it says it is, the number 1 formula for racing cars. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F1 is exactly what it says it is, the number 1 formula for racing cars. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-1/#comment-675388</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 20:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-675388</guid>
		<description>The Grand Prix of Turkey in Istanbul was on this afternoon.  Darlington had its race in the Nascar Sprint Cup series yesterday.  Comparing the action in F1 to that in Nascar, F1 cars are getting weaker as time goes on.  Smaller eninges, even more limited horsepower (300 bhp), its made F1 look so weak that the engine noise isnt attractive.  Sorry F1 but Nascar is doing it for me.  WRC got lame when the economy crashed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Grand Prix of Turkey in Istanbul was on this afternoon.  Darlington had its race in the Nascar Sprint Cup series yesterday.  Comparing the action in F1 to that in Nascar, F1 cars are getting weaker as time goes on.  Smaller eninges, even more limited horsepower (300 bhp), its made F1 look so weak that the engine noise isnt attractive.  Sorry F1 but Nascar is doing it for me.  WRC got lame when the economy crashed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-1/#comment-670347</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 19:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-670347</guid>
		<description>key word there is &quot;In the US&quot;. no one else in the world likes nascar, so you guys can keep your boring sports for youself. im glad we dont have nascar in europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>key word there is &#8220;In the US&#8221;. no one else in the world likes nascar, so you guys can keep your boring sports for youself. im glad we dont have nascar in europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-3/#comment-637379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-637379</guid>
		<description>Why is this even a topic of discussion? I mean who wants to watch a load of heavy cars drive round in a circle, how much skill does that take? You have also got to look at what every day people gain from F1 technology. Whether you are a fan of F1 or not you benefit from the R&amp;D in every day road vehicles. Where do you think carbon fibre, ceramic brakes, paddle shifters, ABS, traction control, crumple zones etc all came from?? Having said that what have American cars over the last few decades offered anyone?? Yeah, they are great in straight lines but not overly fond of cornering which is where the real skill comes into it. Funny how there are no US cars in F1 and they have all come up with various excuses as to why they do not want to compete but the fact is they are so far behind technically that they would be laughed at. Take the Audi Quattro for example. In the eighties Audi applied to be entered into the Trans Am competition with their five cylinder engine. The governing body happily accepted thinking that maybe, for once, the big US V8&#039;s would make a European car look stupid. Wrong, the Audi claimed eight out of thirteen chequered flags and won the championship, easily. Then the American governing body changed the rules so that only US V8 engines can compete with rear wheel drive, funny that. This all boils down to the fact that Americans cannot build cars, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this even a topic of discussion? I mean who wants to watch a load of heavy cars drive round in a circle, how much skill does that take? You have also got to look at what every day people gain from F1 technology. Whether you are a fan of F1 or not you benefit from the R&amp;D in every day road vehicles. Where do you think carbon fibre, ceramic brakes, paddle shifters, ABS, traction control, crumple zones etc all came from?? Having said that what have American cars over the last few decades offered anyone?? Yeah, they are great in straight lines but not overly fond of cornering which is where the real skill comes into it. Funny how there are no US cars in F1 and they have all come up with various excuses as to why they do not want to compete but the fact is they are so far behind technically that they would be laughed at. Take the Audi Quattro for example. In the eighties Audi applied to be entered into the Trans Am competition with their five cylinder engine. The governing body happily accepted thinking that maybe, for once, the big US V8&#8242;s would make a European car look stupid. Wrong, the Audi claimed eight out of thirteen chequered flags and won the championship, easily. Then the American governing body changed the rules so that only US V8 engines can compete with rear wheel drive, funny that. This all boils down to the fact that Americans cannot build cars, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eirik</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-1/#comment-608175</link>
		<dc:creator>Eirik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-608175</guid>
		<description>Well in comparison to your 75 million do F1 attract around 600 million spectators world wide for each race. And it is the second most popular sport in the world after football(not NFL but the sport where the foot kicks the ball, or what you will call soccer)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well in comparison to your 75 million do F1 attract around 600 million spectators world wide for each race. And it is the second most popular sport in the world after football(not NFL but the sport where the foot kicks the ball, or what you will call soccer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-3/#comment-535043</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 21:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-535043</guid>
		<description>Great point of view. I agree 100%. Enjoy the sport mate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point of view. I agree 100%. Enjoy the sport mate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balut</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-3/#comment-534397</link>
		<dc:creator>balut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-534397</guid>
		<description>I think f1 is more exciting because it is a blend of different, you might say, disciplines. NASCAR is, shall we say, on the right side of the spectrum of motorsport. Racing in NASCAR is all about overtaking and entertainment, hence the tracks constructed as ovals. Oval circuits provide drivers the opportunity to concentrate more on the overtaking than turning. The cars too, are regulated to be almost equal in performance against each other in order to facilitate overtaking.

F1 on the other hand, seems to be a combination of Rally-type precision driving (shall we say, the left hand side of the motorsport spectrum) , with overtaking, albeit on a much smaller scale than NASCAR (the other premise on overtaking not taken on this thread besides pit strategy: if you suck on precision driving on the corners, others will catch up and beat you to the flag). Plus on top of all that, the technological savvy and the glitz and glamour that is the trademark of f1.

To sum it all, if you want a balanced motorsport action, watch f1. f1 in my opinion is a centrist type of racing, combining pure overtaking and precision driving with a bit of glam and tech. But don&#039;t get me wrong, NASCAR is a great great motorsport, just like f1 and rally, and motogp as well! And, btw, this is from an Asian point-of-view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think f1 is more exciting because it is a blend of different, you might say, disciplines. NASCAR is, shall we say, on the right side of the spectrum of motorsport. Racing in NASCAR is all about overtaking and entertainment, hence the tracks constructed as ovals. Oval circuits provide drivers the opportunity to concentrate more on the overtaking than turning. The cars too, are regulated to be almost equal in performance against each other in order to facilitate overtaking.</p>
<p>F1 on the other hand, seems to be a combination of Rally-type precision driving (shall we say, the left hand side of the motorsport spectrum) , with overtaking, albeit on a much smaller scale than NASCAR (the other premise on overtaking not taken on this thread besides pit strategy: if you suck on precision driving on the corners, others will catch up and beat you to the flag). Plus on top of all that, the technological savvy and the glitz and glamour that is the trademark of f1.</p>
<p>To sum it all, if you want a balanced motorsport action, watch f1. f1 in my opinion is a centrist type of racing, combining pure overtaking and precision driving with a bit of glam and tech. But don&#8217;t get me wrong, NASCAR is a great great motorsport, just like f1 and rally, and motogp as well! And, btw, this is from an Asian point-of-view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coman2</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/comment-page-3/#comment-477266</link>
		<dc:creator>coman2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/22/f1-vs-nascar/#comment-477266</guid>
		<description>Thanks CanadaJon2... right on, a very exciting race indeed.
I&#039;ll have to think twice next time I think of that greasy hot-dog.  

Frankly, Nascar at the end of the day is like seeing people in a hot-dog competition or better, college kids at beer drinking competition.  At the end someone wins, someone may get injured (or worse), or but the good thing is that they all started on a level playing field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks CanadaJon2&#8230; right on, a very exciting race indeed.<br />
I&#8217;ll have to think twice next time I think of that greasy hot-dog.  </p>
<p>Frankly, Nascar at the end of the day is like seeing people in a hot-dog competition or better, college kids at beer drinking competition.  At the end someone wins, someone may get injured (or worse), or but the good thing is that they all started on a level playing field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 13/27 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/487 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 07:15:46 -->
