<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banned! Active suspension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:32:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne yonel</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-930337</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne yonel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-930337</guid>
		<description>Hi, guys...i don&#039;t have any reason yet. Why? I&#039;m in the hunt of seating in front of you. Try to reply, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, guys&#8230;i don&#8217;t have any reason yet. Why? I&#8217;m in the hunt of seating in front of you. Try to reply, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Formula 1 - Page 8 - PPRuNe Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-928129</link>
		<dc:creator>Formula 1 - Page 8 - PPRuNe Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-928129</guid>
		<description>[...] still hark back to the Lotus active suspension.  It seemed to me to be the way to go, offering something that had a future in passenger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still hark back to the Lotus active suspension.  It seemed to me to be the way to go, offering something that had a future in passenger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burritolikethesun</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-337521</link>
		<dc:creator>Burritolikethesun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-337521</guid>
		<description>One of the few pieces of technology still relevant and transferable to road-going cars. Unlike TCS, STM and automatic gearboxes, it was generally not making the car easier to drive, just faster. The FW16 wouldn&#039;t have killed Senna had it not been for the sudden ban. Turbocharging, another transferable technology, banned in exchange for engines with exotic internals to ultimately exceed flash readings of &gt;19,000 rpm. Lots of use data on beryllium internals does for road cars. Of course there&#039;s the idea of a potential criminal investigation involving a racing crash. More absurdity.

I love F1, but the sometimes-brash rule changes are progressively getting more out of hand, especially now that they&#039;re not even in the interest of safety. They were going to ban tire warmers for 2010? What? Winner-takes-all system? What is this nonsense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the few pieces of technology still relevant and transferable to road-going cars. Unlike TCS, STM and automatic gearboxes, it was generally not making the car easier to drive, just faster. The FW16 wouldn&#8217;t have killed Senna had it not been for the sudden ban. Turbocharging, another transferable technology, banned in exchange for engines with exotic internals to ultimately exceed flash readings of &gt;19,000 rpm. Lots of use data on beryllium internals does for road cars. Of course there&#8217;s the idea of a potential criminal investigation involving a racing crash. More absurdity.</p>
<p>I love F1, but the sometimes-brash rule changes are progressively getting more out of hand, especially now that they&#8217;re not even in the interest of safety. They were going to ban tire warmers for 2010? What? Winner-takes-all system? What is this nonsense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-48672</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-48672</guid>
		<description>No problem Simon - off the top of my head I used:

Autocourse 1987-88
&quot;Lotus: The Competition Cars&quot; http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/
And probably Steve Matchett&#039;s &quot;The Chariot Makers&quot; http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/12/24/the-chariot-makers-steve-matchett-2005/
Loads of Autosports from the &#039;90s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No problem Simon &#8211; off the top of my head I used:</p>
<p>Autocourse 1987-88<br />
&#8220;Lotus: The Competition Cars&#8221; <a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/</a><br />
And probably Steve Matchett&#8217;s &#8220;The Chariot Makers&#8221; <a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/12/24/the-chariot-makers-steve-matchett-2005/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/12/24/the-chariot-makers-steve-matchett-2005/</a><br />
Loads of Autosports from the &#8217;90s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Stiel</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-48671</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Stiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-48671</guid>
		<description>Pardon me for asking again, but what sources were used for the gathering of the information in this article?

I appreciate your response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon me for asking again, but what sources were used for the gathering of the information in this article?</p>
<p>I appreciate your response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chunter</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-46111</link>
		<dc:creator>chunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-46111</guid>
		<description>What strange luck Zanardi has had in his life...

Nowadays, I suppose true active suspension would be thought of as one of those driver&#039;s aids like traction control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What strange luck Zanardi has had in his life&#8230;</p>
<p>Nowadays, I suppose true active suspension would be thought of as one of those driver&#8217;s aids like traction control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Speekingleesh</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/comment-page-1/#comment-46105</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Speekingleesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 19:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/05/17/banned-active-suspension/#comment-46105</guid>
		<description>Internal parts are movabe aerodynamic devices? Just goes to show even back then the FIA were butchering the English language to get their way.
And to think I once had respect for Charlie Whiting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internal parts are movabe aerodynamic devices? Just goes to show even back then the FIA were butchering the English language to get their way.<br />
And to think I once had respect for Charlie Whiting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/21 queries in 0.028 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 425/429 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 08:40:57 -->
