<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banned! Ground effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Pitman</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-748599</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Pitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-748599</guid>
		<description>I so agree with your post, F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsports so why do they keep slowing it down. Why cant someone build a 3000 horsepower car with 4 wheeldrive and ground effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so agree with your post, F1 is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsports so why do they keep slowing it down. Why cant someone build a 3000 horsepower car with 4 wheeldrive and ground effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MinusTwo</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-520738</link>
		<dc:creator>MinusTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-520738</guid>
		<description>I know that it was the right thing to do for saftey reasons... so I don&#039;t disagree with banning ground effects.. but for some reason, I just find the whole idea of slowing the cars down, reducing cornering speeds, etc. goes against my F1 DNA.  You just watch the designers working so hard to eek our every tenth of performance in the cars under the curent regulations, and then there are concepts like this that would instantly make the cars SO much faster.. 

I have always thought that there should be one racing series in the world with unlimited budgets and completely unlimited technology to push the limits of what is possible. I know I am just dreaming, but it is a beautiful dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that it was the right thing to do for saftey reasons&#8230; so I don&#8217;t disagree with banning ground effects.. but for some reason, I just find the whole idea of slowing the cars down, reducing cornering speeds, etc. goes against my F1 DNA.  You just watch the designers working so hard to eek our every tenth of performance in the cars under the curent regulations, and then there are concepts like this that would instantly make the cars SO much faster.. </p>
<p>I have always thought that there should be one racing series in the world with unlimited budgets and completely unlimited technology to push the limits of what is possible. I know I am just dreaming, but it is a beautiful dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-490675</link>
		<dc:creator>alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-490675</guid>
		<description>Is it entirely fair to blame GE for all the incidents listed in this article?  Sure, they contributed, but the cars were generally more dangerous and the drivers more vulnerable than they are now.

Bringing back GE with today&#039;s safety technology will definitely improve cars&#039; ability to follow one another closely enough to get past and the proposed engines are nothing nearly as vicious as the ones which killed so many drivers.

Agree that the safety of driver and spectators is paramount, but things have moved on and it&#039;s time for GE to come back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it entirely fair to blame GE for all the incidents listed in this article?  Sure, they contributed, but the cars were generally more dangerous and the drivers more vulnerable than they are now.</p>
<p>Bringing back GE with today&#8217;s safety technology will definitely improve cars&#8217; ability to follow one another closely enough to get past and the proposed engines are nothing nearly as vicious as the ones which killed so many drivers.</p>
<p>Agree that the safety of driver and spectators is paramount, but things have moved on and it&#8217;s time for GE to come back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Veteren</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-432776</link>
		<dc:creator>The Veteren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-432776</guid>
		<description>Ground effect aerodynamics are vital to bring some much needed overtaking back to Formula 1, and boost popularity by making the sport more exciting. 

Following a car in front causes loss of grip, as insufficient air passes over the front wings, caused by the vacuum left by the leading car. 

Re-introduce ground effect, remove reliance on front wings = more interesting sport! 

Cars are much safer than &#039;78. I&#039;m looking forward to the changes....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ground effect aerodynamics are vital to bring some much needed overtaking back to Formula 1, and boost popularity by making the sport more exciting. </p>
<p>Following a car in front causes loss of grip, as insufficient air passes over the front wings, caused by the vacuum left by the leading car. </p>
<p>Re-introduce ground effect, remove reliance on front wings = more interesting sport! </p>
<p>Cars are much safer than &#8217;78. I&#8217;m looking forward to the changes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wasiF1</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-423190</link>
		<dc:creator>wasiF1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 11:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-423190</guid>
		<description>After reading all the causalities I think Ground effect shouldn&#039;t comeback in F1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading all the causalities I think Ground effect shouldn&#8217;t comeback in F1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tedd McHenry</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-228656</link>
		<dc:creator>Tedd McHenry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-228656</guid>
		<description>Just a nit, but it&#039;s not really correct to say that ground effects was banned from F1.  Flat-bottomed cars were mandated, but you can&#039;t put the genie back in the bottle, and ground effect is still extremely important in the design of an F1 car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a nit, but it&#8217;s not really correct to say that ground effects was banned from F1.  Flat-bottomed cars were mandated, but you can&#8217;t put the genie back in the bottle, and ground effect is still extremely important in the design of an F1 car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-49232</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-49232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to have to start putting a references section at the bottom of these articles!

OK: &quot;Lotus: The Competition Cars&quot; (invaluable for this series, it&#039;s a damn good book), Nigel Roebuck&#039;s biography of Mario Andretti, Steve Olvey&#039;s excellent autobiography &quot;Rapid Response&quot; and, as ever, a thick stack of Autosports. I recently acquired the black-fronted issue from May 1982 after Villeneuve&#039;s death :-(

Here are the links for the books:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/09/24/rapid-response-dr-stephen-olvey-2006/
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/04/15/mario-andretti-world-champion-nigel-roebuck-1979/
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/

Happy reading!

There is a new book coming out on the 1982 season which I am sure which touch on this subject and we will have a review of soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to start putting a references section at the bottom of these articles!</p>
<p>OK: &#8220;Lotus: The Competition Cars&#8221; (invaluable for this series, it&#8217;s a damn good book), Nigel Roebuck&#8217;s biography of Mario Andretti, Steve Olvey&#8217;s excellent autobiography &#8220;Rapid Response&#8221; and, as ever, a thick stack of Autosports. I recently acquired the black-fronted issue from May 1982 after Villeneuve&#8217;s death <img src='http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Here are the links for the books:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/09/24/rapid-response-dr-stephen-olvey-2006/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/09/24/rapid-response-dr-stephen-olvey-2006/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/04/15/mario-andretti-world-champion-nigel-roebuck-1979/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/04/15/mario-andretti-world-champion-nigel-roebuck-1979/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2006/07/15/f1-book-review-lotus-the-competition-cars-anthony-pritchard/</a></p>
<p>Happy reading!</p>
<p>There is a new book coming out on the 1982 season which I am sure which touch on this subject and we will have a review of soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Stiel</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-49220</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Stiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-49220</guid>
		<description>Apologies for bothering you again but what books did you use to gather the information for this article?

Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for bothering you again but what books did you use to gather the information for this article?</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Stiel</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-49219</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Stiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 20:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-49219</guid>
		<description>Sorry to bother you but what books did you use to gather the information for this article?

Many thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to bother you but what books did you use to gather the information for this article?</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-48899</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 06:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/06/07/banned-ground-effects/#comment-48899</guid>
		<description>The ban on moveable aerodynamic parts pre-dates ground effects - when Brabham&#039;s fan car was banned in &#039;78 that was on the grounds that it contained moveable aerodynamic parts:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/02/22/banned-brabham-alfa-romeo-bt46b-fan-car/

The CART walk-out was at Texas in 2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ban on moveable aerodynamic parts pre-dates ground effects &#8211; when Brabham&#8217;s fan car was banned in &#8217;78 that was on the grounds that it contained moveable aerodynamic parts:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/02/22/banned-brabham-alfa-romeo-bt46b-fan-car/" rel="nofollow">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/02/22/banned-brabham-alfa-romeo-bt46b-fan-car/</a></p>
<p>The CART walk-out was at Texas in 2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 12/24 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 482/484 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 06:57:43 -->
