<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 in the blogs 36: Why Indy lost F1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chunter</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/comment-page-1/#comment-61284</link>
		<dc:creator>chunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/#comment-61284</guid>
		<description>The reason I completely disagree with F1 at Daytona, not that I&#039;d mind the proximity of the event, is that a really bad accident involving Indy cars there in the 50&#039;s resulted in that style of car being banned from racing there.  That ban was since lifted for winter practice last year on the stipulation that the cars drive on the motorcycle infield, but I don&#039;t think one-seat cars will officially race there anytime soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I completely disagree with F1 at Daytona, not that I&#8217;d mind the proximity of the event, is that a really bad accident involving Indy cars there in the 50&#8242;s resulted in that style of car being banned from racing there.  That ban was since lifted for winter practice last year on the stipulation that the cars drive on the motorcycle infield, but I don&#8217;t think one-seat cars will officially race there anytime soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number 38</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/comment-page-1/#comment-61234</link>
		<dc:creator>Number 38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/07/21/f1-in-the-blogs-36-why-indy-lost-f1/#comment-61234</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t sell Bernie Ecclestone a ticket to a NASCAR event let alone allow him to insert a single line in ANY contract. That man is a Cancer that can destroy anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t sell Bernie Ecclestone a ticket to a NASCAR event let alone allow him to insert a single line in ANY contract. That man is a Cancer that can destroy anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/16 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 340/344 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 10:14:33 -->
