Comments on: Debate: More street tracks good for F1?

By: John

John — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:12:51 +0000

The problem with a street circuit is that much of it is a concrete barricaded tunnel. This is fine until someone comes to grief. They hit a barrier and bounce right back in amongst other competitors that get all mixed up in the carnage and get taken out of the race for something that is nothing to do with their personal performance.
The same situation on a dedicated track almost always sees the mistake cause the particular driver slide off into a sand trap and no one else is effected.
This makes for a much more fair result and more cars finishing or at least continuing to compete.
Additionally less barriers make it safer for the drivers. They are not so restricted in being able to see the track on corners. Such as the incident in A1 GP yesterday when Canada spun, couldn’t see through the barricade, tried to spin heir car back the right direction and the English car T Boned Canada as the direction correction was conducted. Had the barrier not been there on a normal track this would never have occurred.
From a spectators perspective dedicated tracks make for much better viewing than street circuits.

By: Number 38

Number 38 — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 20:30:15 +0000

Does anyone really believe there will be PASSING on a street circuit? Some of you have brought out the details…….it is a “PR stunt”; pitstop passes will be the norm; attrition, both through crashes and broken cars will determine the lesser places; but the race will be won on Saturday when we see who wins the pole.
A parade is a parade whether it be on a public street or a racing circuit, my concern is ……. SINGAPORE?????

By: milos

milos — Sat, 18 Aug 2007 06:44:36 +0000

Macau GP 2007 and video links for Macau GP 2006…

Yet again I refer to the f1fanatic website and his article “More street tracks good for F1?” and a bit to another article “Ten… Jobs for Ecclestone to do”.
One of the best street races is without doubt the Macau GP. There is no F1 race there…

By: chunter

chunter — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 21:51:03 +0000

Misunderstandings can happen.

Not to carry ChampCar’s banner a little too much, but when I drive home on a narrow two-lane road with no shoulder, trees lurching over the road and cars everywhere from the five o’clock rush, I relate to ChampCar.

Despite where I live, there are no places where I can speed up and down hills conveniently in the way most F1 circuits are designed, and there is no place where I can legally make 500 consecutive left turns.

I appreciate the apparent inclusion of bridges in the new circuit designs, and wonder what the wind currents on those bridges will do to the F1 cars! Is this a tip of the hat to all those Japanese racing video games that seem to need to include a suspension bridge in the circuit layout somewhere?

Will the racing be processionary? Probably.

By: Keith Collantine

Keith Collantine — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:42:27 +0000

I wasn't criticising American racing, I was explaining two opposing points of view (as I often do in these posts) that people have about street circuits: "Are you glad to see F1 bringing the show right into the hearts of major cities? Or are street tracks slow and potentially unsafe gimmicks that belong in Champ Car and the Indy Racing League - but not Formula 1?" I'm not slating Champ Car or the IRL - I watch and enjoy both series and write about them on Maximum Motorsport. And I wrote this post last week criticising another writer for what I felt were unfair comments about American racing. I think my approach has been validated by the comments so far - some people have said street tracks are too slow and difficult to pass on, others like having a race in the centre of the city.

By: BogarTRuleS

BogarTRuleS — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:24:06 +0000

“Or are street tracks slow and potentially unsafe gimmicks that belong in Champ Car and the Indy Racing League – but not Formula 1?” What the Bloody Hell brought this on? I have only been here a month or 2 but i have seen and felt the anti America racing bigger and more vehemently over the past few weeks, what is going on? I love formula one it is my favorite racing series but do not dis champ or irl “gimmicks” it is a bloody insult there is as much skill and set up to each series. Albeit there isn’t as much tech that goes in as f1 but it is more up to the driver and how they drive and car set up as to how they place in qualifying aka (most f1 races)I think the writing is getting down rite insulting here.

By: verasaki

verasaki — Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:09:04 +0000

Street courses are convenient for fans, and sometimes they are even a visual success(Long Beach, Detroit to name two) but from a racing point of view, particularly a F1 view I’m just not loving it and I’m not sure why. I had no problem with CART/Champ Car street races back in the day when the series was more fun to watch than F1. Perhaps I just don’t want to see F1 turned into Champ Car? Or maybe I also have a vague recollection of one of the F1 who-do duo, (Max or Bernie?), state back in the ’90′s that they didn’t want to dumb F1 down to CART standards? Honestly I can’t remember what the issue at the time was-safety,tech specs, maybe it was even track configuration-but this is just a money grab for F1. But, Valencia and Singapore? What’s the temperature like on whatever days those are scheduled? I live in Dallas and seem to remember a hot July one year long ago,(not a surprise to the natives, by the way) and a temporary course that went to pieces in the heat. Good luck!

By: Mark

Mark — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 22:42:50 +0000

The beauty of a good street circuit is that it punishes mistakes. If you get a wheel wrong at most tracks you slide over the kurb, through the run-off and then back onto the track. Get a wheel wrong at a street circuit and you are out the race. Little mistakes like Seb Vettel’s at the Hungaroring become big ones. I remember watching F1 at the hated Phoenix track in the late 80′s early 90′s and it was truly a race of attrition that rewarded 2 hours of blemish free, barrier brushing precision.

Plus of course, Alesi dicing with Senna in 1990.

Bring on the new street circuits!

By: Dan M

Dan M — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:32:47 +0000

Ovals are by far the most dangerous areas to race. Street tracks are dangerous only if they are of poor design, or cannot be made with runoffs in the correct area.

By: patrick

patrick — Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:35:15 +0000

Street circuits unsafe?

Well, if they’re as cobbled together as that track at Vegas they raced at in Champ Cars this year, they certainly can be.

But most of the big fatal and near-fatal accidents in IRL and Champ Car have happened on ovals.