KERS technology revealed

Jon Hilton of Flybrid, Adrian Moore of Xtrac and Dick Elsy of Torotrak with their compact flywheel and CVT variator for the KERSA British company has confirmed it is working with a top F1 team on the development of the Kinetic Energy Recovery System planned for 2009.

Torotrak is working with two other companies, Xtrac and Flybrid Systems, to supply several important technologies. These are Torotrak’s traction drive technology, a continuously variable transmissions (CVT) by Xtrac and Flybrid’s hybrid vehicle expertise. CVT was previously banned in Formula 1.

The picture shows Jon Hilton of Flybrid, Adrian Moore of Xtrac and Dick Elsy of Torotrak with their compact flywheel and CVT variator for the KERS.

Some teams are understood to be lobbying the FIA to delay the introduction of KERS to 2011.

The trio explained how the system works:

“The mechanical KERS system utilises flywheel technology developed by Flybrid Systems to recover and store a moving vehicle’s kinetic energy which is otherwise wasted when the vehicle is decelerated. The energy is received from the driveline through the Torotrak CVT, engineered and supplied by Xtrac, as the vehicle decelerates, and is subsequently released back into the driveline, again through the CVT, as the vehicle accelerates. The FIA has defined the amount of energy recovery for the 2009 season as 400kJ per lap giving the driver an extra 80hp over a period of 6.67 seconds.

“Compared to the alternative of electrical-battery systems, the mechanical KERS system provides a significantly more compact, efficient, lighter and environmentally-friendly solution.

“The components within each variator include an input disc and an opposing output disc. Each disc is formed so that the gap created between the discs is ‘doughnut’ shaped; that is, the toroidal surfaces on each disc form the toroidal cavity.

“Two or three rollers are located inside each toroidal cavity and are positioned so that the outer edge of each roller is in contact with the toroidal surfaces of the input disc and output disc.

“As the input disc rotates, power is transferred via the rollers to the output disc, which rotates in the opposite direction to the input disc.

“The angle of the roller determines the ratio of the Variator and therefore a change in the angle of the roller results in a change in the ratio. So, with the roller at a small radius (near the centre) on the input disc and at a large radius (near the edge) on the output disc the Variator produces a ‘low’ ratio. Moving the roller across the discs to a large radius at the input disc and corresponding low radius at the output produces the ‘high’ ratio and provides the full ratio sweep in a smooth, continuous manner.

“The transfer of power through the contacting surfaces of the discs and rollers takes place via a microscopic film of specially developed long-molecule traction fluid. This fluid separates the rolling surfaces of the discs and rollers at their contact points.

“The input and output discs are clamped together within each variator unit. The traction fluid in the contact points between the discs and rollers become highly viscous under this clamping pressure, increasing its ‘stickiness’ and creating an efficient mechanism for transferring power between the rotating discs and rollers.”

More about KERS

Advert | Go Ad-free


38 comments on KERS technology revealed

  1. Gussi said on 3rd February 2009, 18:44

    HA HA reminds me of my racing Daf 33 from 30 years ago

  2. Amit Palsule said on 27th March 2009, 13:33

    I think this technology is just like NOS wich will be glicerine for the F1 world.It will help on the staight roads, It will decrease the time for few seconds.It will also increase the top speed,but on the turns there are chances of wipping out if the driver pushes the botton!!!!!!!!!

  3. NOSXR said on 28th March 2009, 20:56

    stop being girls F1, bring back turbos, that will lower the cost of performance.

  4. Mark Gradwell said on 29th March 2009, 14:41

    Two competing technologies. Mechanical flywheel and electric motor-capacitor/battery. On the domestic car front both adding weight and danger. With the flywheel a 64k RPM. spinny thing being suddenly released when a car crashes opposed to kilo-amps cumming from the battery pack of the electrical system.

    All in all I’m hoping mechanical ends up winning this particular VHS/Betamax war. Since it will be inherently lighter and simpler. Ether system could save your life one day if say you mis judge an overtaking maneuver on some lonely country road.

    As for saving the environment…er no. Only a breakthrough with nuclear fusion reactor technology can do that. Frankly enjoy it while you can folks. We’re almost certainly stuffed.

  5. i cant beleive i stumbled onto your post..thanks so much!!! i am going to have to sign up 2 ur RSS feed so i can keep updated with your post…thanks Again

  6. KERS or regenerative brakes have serious disadvantages. It is only good for sport cars but hardly have any advantages with standard cars because it has to operate an electric generator, which works only at higher speeds and may not be possible to operate with front wheels.

    My invented new brake system has eliminated all these disadvantages. Please read my article at:

  7. I appreciate, cause I found exactly what I was looking for. You’ve ended my 4 day long hunt! God Bless you man. Have a great day. Bye.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.