<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Championship standings after the Chinese GP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Number 38</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-82622</link>
		<dc:creator>Number 38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 04:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/#comment-82622</guid>
		<description>I give credit when it&#039;s due and STR did a great job today, most of the accolades bestowed on Vettel but he ran alone and unchallanged most of the race, Luizzi on the other hand was under pressure from a superior BMW and handed Heidfeld a black eye! Although to be fair, anyone passing anyone in F1 requires an error on the leading drivers part or some special circumstance. Luizzi didn&#039;t err !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give credit when it&#8217;s due and STR did a great job today, most of the accolades bestowed on Vettel but he ran alone and unchallanged most of the race, Luizzi on the other hand was under pressure from a superior BMW and handed Heidfeld a black eye! Although to be fair, anyone passing anyone in F1 requires an error on the leading drivers part or some special circumstance. Luizzi didn&#8217;t err !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BR</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-82451</link>
		<dc:creator>BR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/#comment-82451</guid>
		<description>I agreed with you Magnus. Vettel and Liuzzi have done great jobs!!! It was a great race except if you are LH&#039;s fan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed with you Magnus. Vettel and Liuzzi have done great jobs!!! It was a great race except if you are LH&#8217;s fan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/comment-page-1/#comment-82055</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2007/10/07/championship-standings-after-the-chinese-gp/#comment-82055</guid>
		<description>I think Red Bull is a bit disappointed not to have capitalized on their opportunity to move ahead of Williams today. Toro Rosso on the other hand did a splendid job to move up into 7th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Red Bull is a bit disappointed not to have capitalized on their opportunity to move ahead of Williams today. Toro Rosso on the other hand did a splendid job to move up into 7th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/17 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 357/361 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 12:44:08 -->
