F1 07 review: Complete 2007 statistics

Kimi Raikkonen, Fernando Alonso, Felipe Massa, Shanghai podium, 2007 | Ferrari mediaAt the risk of having to rewrite swathes of this should McLaren win their appeal against the Brazilian Grand Prix results, here’s a complete statistical breakdown of the 2007 F1 season.

Who won what, who broke records, and loads of random facts…

The championships

Kimi Raikkonen became the third Finnish world champion and won the fourth championship for the Scandinavian country. Read more statistics on Raikkonen’s championship victory.

Ferrari won their 15th constructors’ championship. They also scored their 200th Grand Prix victory in the Chinese Grand Prix.

Raikkonen’s victory margin of a single point (for the sixth time in F1 history) is the second smallest ever, beaten only by Niki Lauda’s triumph by half a point in 1984.

For the first time ever three drivers scored over 100 points in a single season: Kimi Raikkonen 110, Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso 109 each.

Only once before has the driver going into the championship finale in third position claimed the title – Giuseppa Farina in 1950. Three drivers stayed in the championship battle until the final round this year for the first time in 21 years.

For the 14th time in the last 18 years, the winner of the opening round went on to win the championship, which has happened 27 times in 58 championships.

Lewis Hamilton’s record-breaking year

Lewis Hamilton, Bahrain, McLaren-Mercedes, 2007Lewis Hamilton broke or matched several records. He scored nine consecutive podiums in his first nine races, which also equalled the record for most consecutive podiums by a British driver also held by Jim Clark. In doing so he also set the record for the most consecutive points finishes from a debut race (nine).

He equalled Jacques Villeneuve’s tally of victories in a debut season (four), became the youngest driver to lead the world championship and set the most pole positions for a rookie driver (six). His 12 front row starts was another record for a rookie.

Hamilton scored the most points ever by a new F1 driver, and had the most podium finishes and led the most races. He led his first seven races, another record.

He was also the only maiden Grand Prix winner in 2007, becoming the ninth driver to win in his first Grand Prix season. He won at his sixth attempt, a feat bettered by nine drivers: Giuseppi Farina, Giancarlo Baghetti, Juan Manuel Fangio, Tony Brooks, Emerson Fittipaldi, Ludovico Scarfiotti, Jacques Villeneuve, Jose Froilan Gonzalez and Clay Regazzoni.

Hamilton spent the most laps in first position this year (321), followed by Felipe Massa (300), Kimi Raikkonen (212) and Fernando Alonso (203).

At Japan he became the youngest driver to do the treble of pole position, win and fastest lap.

But there is one final record he claimed that he will wish to forget. No one has ever had a 17 point or greater lead with two races remaining and then lost the championship.

McLaren and Ferrari dominate

Chinese Grand Prix 2007, Shanghai International Circuit, start | DaimlerRaikkonen and Massa set the most fastest laps – six each. Fastest laps are a Raikkonen trait. He set the fastest lap at Hungary and Turkey late in the race out of a self-confessed frustration at being unable to pass the man in front of him. He scored his 25th fastest lap this year – by comparison, he has 15 wins and 14 pole positions.

Such was McLaren and Ferrari’s domination that they led 97.2% of the 1,036 laps this year. The remaining 29 were led by Heikki Kovalainen (nine), Markus Winkelhock (six), Mark Webber (five), Nick Heidfeld (three), Sebastian Vettel (three), David Coulthard (one), Giancarlo Fisichella (one) and Robert Kubica (one).

Only five of the 51 podium finishing positions available this year was taken by a non-McLaren or Ferrari driver. They were Nick Heidfeld (Montreal and Hungaroring), Alex Wurz (Montreal), Mark Webber (Nurburgring) and Heikki Kovalainen (Fuji Speedway).

Miscellaneous

Spyker led a Grand Prix for the first time thanks to Markus Winkelhock at the N?â??rburgirng. They also scored their first point (with Adrian Sutil), as did Super Aguri (Takuma Sato).

Rubens Barrichello failed to score a point all year for the first time in an F1 career that began in 1993, and next year could become the longest ever in terms of race starts. Similarly, Ralf Schumacher failed to score a podium finish for the first time in his F1 career.

Eleven winners this year started from pole position on the grid, four from second and two from third. The only driver to start from the top three not in a McLaren or Ferrari was Nick Heidfeld, who did so three times. The last time all the winners started in the top three was in 1998.

Three-quarters of race starts ended in classified finishes this year, matching the 2005 race finishing rate after last year’s blip down to 69%. This was caused by an increase in mechanical failures mainly due to the introduction of V8 engines. Last year’s 18% rate of mechanical failure fell to 14% this year, but still not as low as in 2005 when it was 11%.

Mark Webber had the most race-ending mechanical failures, six (two more than anyone else), just as he did in 2002, except on that occasions Ralf Schumacher also had six breakdowns.

Under the previous points system the championship finishing order for the top four would have been:

Kimi Raikkonen 93
Lewis Hamilton 87
Fernando Alonso 85
Felipe Massa 72

Photos: Ferrari | Daimler | Ferrari

Read more Grand Prix statistics

Advert | Go Ad-free

15 comments on F1 07 review: Complete 2007 statistics

  1. Keith, where do you get all this information?!

    Great work.

  2. Good to see the points as it would’ve been had it been under the older system. I’m still advocating for a 12 point win if the remainder points down to 8th place are rewarded! Is there an online calculator/website that tracks this? (because I’m a lazy get.)

  3. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 16th November 2007, 12:17

    I’ve got a list somewhere Loki I’ll post it later.

    You can see some of that information for past seasons on the statistics page. Here’s the data for 2006 for example:

    “Under the 1990 points system, Alonso and Schumacher would have tied on 87 points. Their best eleven scores would count – seven wins and four second places. But Alonso would still have won by dint of having more second places overall.”

  4. “You can see some of that information for past seasons”

    last year you had graphs… no graphs this year?

  5. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 16th November 2007, 13:30

    I thought the graphs made it look a bit technical – I can add them if you like?

  6. we do like a good graph.

    mind you with its 10y engine freeze, f1 is loosing the hi-tech crown. maybe you should starting dumbing down your site too?

    as a small homage to max :)

  7. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 16th November 2007, 16:04

    Graphs it is!

    Though possibly not until tomorrow…

  8. Very good work Keith, as always :-D

  9. carlos said on 16th November 2007, 17:08

    Well written, but why Hamilton has his own entry highlighted “Lewis Hamilton’s record-breaking year” detailing, step by step, all his records, and Raikonnen is just mentioned in a few lines in “The championships”. Is not him the champion? I want not to mention the room given to certain another world champion.

    I would add another records never seen before, in the Hamilton entry.

  10. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 16th November 2007, 17:16

    I’ve already written a post on Raikkonen’s title win, which is linked to above, and on Ferrari’s 200th race win, which is also linked to above.

  11. My question is now not where you get all this information, but how on earth do you find the time to do all this?! I’d have a hard time just writing one article a day, nevermind a job etc! Kudos, Keith.

  12. does anyone no what mclarens construtors points would of been at th end of the season if they didn’t get them taken away?

  13. Number 38 said on 16th November 2007, 21:48

    Nice work Keith, the icing on the cake, the reason you really are better than Suzy Kobel !!!!!!

  14. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 18th November 2007, 10:56

    Graphs ahoy!

    Also Mike you’ll find the answer to your question in that link.

  15. ahhh, now that is a fine set of graphs you have there :)

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.