How do you stop teams from using wind tunnels?

Toyota F1 wind tunnel, 2006The latest Max Mosley master plan to cut costs in F1 involved banning teams from using their wind tunnels.

On January 11th proposals will be put to the team principals requiring that they reduce their wind tunnel use as follows: Each team may have only one wind tunnel operating five days per week, eight hours per day, with a maximum of eight ‘runs’ with one car at a time each day.

Wind speed will be restricted and only 60% scale models can be used. Many teams already use full size models and some already have more than one wind tunnel. Modelling the tests on computers using Computational Fluid Dynamics will also be restricted.

But exactly how can the FIA do this? I don’t see how they can enforce it short of putting an ‘FIA spy’ in every team. And will teams with ‘B-teams’, like Honda/Super Aguri be allowed two tunnels?

This seems to have a couple of worrying flaws that makes me wonder whether this is a serious proposal. Is it another use of the classic Max Mosley tactic of demanding an utterly unreasonable innovation in order to get the teams to agree to something less severe?

More on the FIA

Advert | Go Ad-free

27 comments on How do you stop teams from using wind tunnels?

  1. A wind tunnel is an expensive operation to run – those teams with them would be reluctant to stop using them as we al know 6/10ths of a sec can be expensive and give that team the edge – Yes I think Max is at it again and after last year – he may get away with it as they have seen what he did to macca – but the possible biggest user may be ferrari – we know they are designing cars for other formula’s which have similar constraints that the knew F1 cars will have soon – nothing to stop them using info for one type on another – seeing it would be their intellectual info

  2. Eric M. said on 18th December 2007, 7:38

    This one has me puzzled as well. I’m sure this will involve putting some sort of electronic monitoring on the wind tunnels and CFD computers, even though it would be child’s play for the tech’s at these teams to get around it. I thought I read somewhere that it actually might not be enforced at all, and it might be a sort of “good faith” agreement, sort of like the testing mileage limit.

  3. As long as the wind tunnel monitors wear little blue hats. That’d make it all ok.

    While Max is at it, here are a few things he should outlaw along with wind tunnel time (that companies have already paid for).

    simulator time (because no F1 team can break down and buy and Xbox)

    Unicorns, they have no place in F1

    Drivers with oversized heads who are Scottish,, (I like him,, I’m just saying,, it can’t be aerodynamic and it’s got to be giving Red Bull fits!)

    Tire Warmers,, oh wait they did that,, so now tires aren’t safe,, thanks Max.

    Kicks to the nuts,, except those already reserved for Max.

    If they outlaw CFD time they might as well! They can just put together some ad hoc networks and have kids at home with their screensavers running cfd for them as part of their “free team screensaver kit”. limiting wind tunnel use is riduculous and doesn’t serve much of a purpose, all the teams know it’s the only place to innovate. If they want to limit aero,, then make a mandatory body kit and make them use it (now where’d my homologated engine electrics box go,,, oh there it is!)

    Note to self,, kick Max in the nuts for putting the amazing F1 engineers out of work (that’s what he’s doing right?)

  4. Fred Schechter

    Quote: “Note to self,, kick Max in the nuts for putting the amazing F1 engineers out of work (that’s what he’s doing right?)”

    Man, you are echoing my sentiments. First, the engine specific rule changes, then the FREEZE. Nevermind Max, you think you still have cars and the viewers. Even hardcore addicts would switch of the telly. Why? It is Formula 1 we are vying to watch, not “Formula Dumb!”

    You have to be politically correct, we see no reason. F1 gained popularity, as it was, somewhat is (inspite of all FIA’s & Max’s meddling). It definitely would not remain so, in the near future. That, would be the demise of F1. An industry, a sport, an engineers playground, all this would just vanish into thin air, with viewership plummeting owing to these ridiculous bouts of fits(?).

    I’ve applauded Max’s common sense over all these years of rule changes. Now, am to be given a reason, to believe that F1 will remain the same. A technical summit. Difficult to climb and even harder to reach the top. What then otherwise be the difference between any other formula and F1?

    A worried F1 fan!

  5. unless Max Mosley has James Bond on his payroll he has no way to police the use of wind tunnels and computer simulations etc etc …

    He hasn’t learnt or he does not want to learn – There is no way he can make the teams to stop spending money … They will spend the money no matter what as long as they are in F1. When they feel like no more spending, they leave (like Ford) and let an eccentric billionaires to come in their place (Mateschitz, Mallya… ). The spending will go on and so will the flow of stupid Max ideas …

  6. oliver said on 18th December 2007, 11:56

    Universal F1 paint scheme is soon on its way.

    To think, ForceIndia is just trying to get its wind tunnel working in full. Let teams spend the money as they like, if they go bust, a new team replaces them. Apart from the wasteful engine development and endless tyre testing, what else is left for teams to seek performance, lets not forget major electronics have also been banned.

    There is no such thing as perfection, the right amount of team personnel, the right amount of working hours, the right number of wind tunnel usage, teams are seeking to improve and earn more money. IF you want development to stop, then do not have winner takes all approach to F1, share the prize money equally and watch innovation die, costs will come down drastically, there wont even be any need for speed, teams will not build new cars, they wont need much personnel, just the one or two to strap the drivers into the car. Perhaps the driver may do it himself, he will have plenty of time.

  7. i think max really is mad! this is a stupid idea!

  8. Quote:” Note to self,, kick Max in the nuts for putting the amazing F1 engineers out of work (that’s what he’s doing right?)”

    such a good point!

  9. uniformity – conformity – the whole ethos of the fia’s outlook on motor racing development for the forseeable future – we are living through one of F1′s most rigid and depressing era’s – if man does not invent things his civilisation dies as well – the trouble is that F1 is in the hands of two elderly/senile gentlemen – both well past their sell by dates.
    You wont be able to get rid of them they will die at their posts(sooner rather than later hopefully?) – they might need to put stakes through their hearts to make sure they dont come back though???

  10. Number 38 said on 18th December 2007, 13:31

    For 2009 MadMax has new “cost effective” formulas for PAINT, he will introduce “standardized” lubricants and
    healthier menus for company cafeterias! When’s it gonna end?

  11. Why do we allow computers to do the work anyway? We don’t want them IN the car so why have them to DESIGN the car?

    I must say, although I don’t see how he would enforce it, I like the idea of limiting the size of the models and computer power they are allowed to use. This should give areo more of that ‘black magic’ feel. It would allow one team to be aggressive with what they try and possibly benefit but take the chance of failing badly.

    It should also keep the areo copying to a minimum. Not everyone would want to run wheel hubs because they may have to waste precious time in the tunnel to develop them (just an example).

    Like has been stated, any team could use a mass network of volunteer computers to crunch numbers, they wouldn’t own the computers and the FiA would have no way of monitoring or stopping the average fan from contributing his computer.

    They already do this with the PS3 a very powerful game system. Scientist ask people to run a program while they are not using their PS3. They then send simple problems to each PS3, when you consider that hundreds of thousands could be doing this BMW’s super computer doesn’t look like that much of an advantage.

  12. The SETI project did the same with spare PC computational power. That would be a really great way of expanding CFD capability – though it would be prone to “espionage” as different teams attempt to intercept and interpret each other’s behind-the-screensaver software.

  13. Steven Roy said on 18th December 2007, 16:25

    As soon as I read the proposals my first thought was that it cannot be policed. How is anyone going to know what size model someone puts in a wind tunnel? Given that Stewart used to use a tunnel in California what is to stop a team setting up a wind tunel anywhere in the world? CFD is even harder to police. A wind tunnel is a large object and difficult to hide. But an office with a couple of dozen people sitting in front of computers. It is insane.

    Apart from anything else before CFD arrived on the seen car companies were looking at using water tunnels instead of wind tunnels. Water is 15 or 16 times as viscous as air so you get more accurate results. There is nothing in these rules to stop a team building a 500% water tunnel. Or any other fluid.

    Either Max is getting dumber or this is another one of those things he introduces to be negotiated away to get what he really wants.

  14. MacademiaNut said on 18th December 2007, 17:19

    Why doesn’t Max simply give 22 cars and get 22 people to race it. No teams.. just test the drivers.

    Stupid.

  15. verasaki said on 18th December 2007, 18:52

    Is it my imagination or are these proposals moving further away from the tech specs they can actually impose on the developement of a car to reduce cost,speed, whatever the catch phrase of the day is and heading into fascist territory? I don’t use the term lightly, either.

    If the use of these tunnels is restricted to the hours Herr Mosely likes best, if I were one of teams who footed the multimillion dollar price tag to build one I’d be one angry sporting member. The FIA needs to impose limits on themselves.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.