<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 Racing vs Motorsport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:25:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Speekingleesh</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-154532</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Speekingleesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-154532</guid>
		<description>I gave up buying F1 Racing just before the start of last season. For a while I&#039;d been finding the articles less and less interesting, and I was really only buying out of habit. (And EJ&#039;s sucking up to Mosley to get the 12th grid place was a shameful waste of space.)
My brother started buying since I stopped, and I&#039;ve looked at the occasional issue - don&#039;t miss it at all. Superficial news analaysis, Windsor being a Hamilton fanboy instead of Schumacher one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave up buying F1 Racing just before the start of last season. For a while I&#8217;d been finding the articles less and less interesting, and I was really only buying out of habit. (And EJ&#8217;s sucking up to Mosley to get the 12th grid place was a shameful waste of space.)<br />
My brother started buying since I stopped, and I&#8217;ve looked at the occasional issue &#8211; don&#8217;t miss it at all. Superficial news analaysis, Windsor being a Hamilton fanboy instead of Schumacher one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sigmund</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-154285</link>
		<dc:creator>sigmund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-154285</guid>
		<description>I subscribe to F1-racing, but as an alonso fan I&#039;m tired of Windsor always saying he is a second rate driver, who should look at Lewis and Kimi for how to drive a car. Come on!

He wasn&#039;t at his best last year, but he is a hell of a driver. Alan Henry even suggested that he will never win a race again. It might be true, but I seriously doubt it. Also as a non-british reader, I&#039;m fed up of Lewis on the cover. I still enjoy the magazine, but I might start reading Motorsport instead.

I have only ever read one issue, but I liked a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I subscribe to F1-racing, but as an alonso fan I&#8217;m tired of Windsor always saying he is a second rate driver, who should look at Lewis and Kimi for how to drive a car. Come on!</p>
<p>He wasn&#8217;t at his best last year, but he is a hell of a driver. Alan Henry even suggested that he will never win a race again. It might be true, but I seriously doubt it. Also as a non-british reader, I&#8217;m fed up of Lewis on the cover. I still enjoy the magazine, but I might start reading Motorsport instead.</p>
<p>I have only ever read one issue, but I liked a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-154175</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-154175</guid>
		<description>I think Roebuck has worked wonders with Motor Sport.  It is a magazine I have gone through phases with over the years.  Sometimes I love it other times I don&#039;t.  It seems to be on a permanent see saw between modern and historical.  The current writing team are as good a team as I have seen put together anywhere and Roebuck is the best I have ever read.

I used to buy every issue of F1 racing but I am now at the stage where I don&#039;t think I would miss it.  My interest is not entirely focussed on F1 so a magazine that only does F1 is not especially appealing.  Autosport is still a must even though Roebuck is no longer there.  Mark Hughes is now the first page I turn to on a Thursday.  I kind of get the impression that Haymarket knew a year in advance that Roebuck was leaving and Mark Hughes was being groomed for that prime position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Roebuck has worked wonders with Motor Sport.  It is a magazine I have gone through phases with over the years.  Sometimes I love it other times I don&#8217;t.  It seems to be on a permanent see saw between modern and historical.  The current writing team are as good a team as I have seen put together anywhere and Roebuck is the best I have ever read.</p>
<p>I used to buy every issue of F1 racing but I am now at the stage where I don&#8217;t think I would miss it.  My interest is not entirely focussed on F1 so a magazine that only does F1 is not especially appealing.  Autosport is still a must even though Roebuck is no longer there.  Mark Hughes is now the first page I turn to on a Thursday.  I kind of get the impression that Haymarket knew a year in advance that Roebuck was leaving and Mark Hughes was being groomed for that prime position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob ijbema</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153987</link>
		<dc:creator>rob ijbema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153987</guid>
		<description>haven&#039;t read F1 mag for years,who needs a double page spread of a groved tyre,or a blue glove?
I buy Motorsport  for the historic matter and they should leave modern F1 to Autosport and the net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haven&#8217;t read F1 mag for years,who needs a double page spread of a groved tyre,or a blue glove?<br />
I buy Motorsport  for the historic matter and they should leave modern F1 to Autosport and the net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obster</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153960</link>
		<dc:creator>Obster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153960</guid>
		<description>Hate to see the increased coverage of modern F1 in Motor Sport magazine-I just read an article about what&#039;s-his-name who runs the BMW team that said virtually NOTHING.
Leave the &quot;soap-opera&quot; aspects of modern F1 to other mags and the internet, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to see the increased coverage of modern F1 in Motor Sport magazine-I just read an article about what&#8217;s-his-name who runs the BMW team that said virtually NOTHING.<br />
Leave the &quot;soap-opera&quot; aspects of modern F1 to other mags and the internet, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertigo</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153956</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153956</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got a lot of hate for Windsor in F1 Racing too, and it can be a bit soft, but it&#039;s still worth buying for the Long Interviews and the fact that you get at least one good feature a month - the article featured this month about the guys hoping to get into F1 in 2009 was a good read. 
I quite like Autosport, but I don&#039;t buy it every week - £3 is a bit much when it doesn&#039;t really hold my interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got a lot of hate for Windsor in F1 Racing too, and it can be a bit soft, but it&#8217;s still worth buying for the Long Interviews and the fact that you get at least one good feature a month &#8211; the article featured this month about the guys hoping to get into F1 in 2009 was a good read.<br />
I quite like Autosport, but I don&#8217;t buy it every week &#8211; £3 is a bit much when it doesn&#8217;t really hold my interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153864</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153864</guid>
		<description>Well, I enjoy Autosport and Motorsport and find their coverage of other formulas enjoyable - there is more to racing that JUST F1 (though not too much!).  I&#039;ve always enjoyed F1 Racing and shamefacedly confess to enjoying Peter Windsor&#039;s writing - I find his insight&#039;s into the various drivers techniques and psychology to be utterly fascinating.  Mark Hughes makes Autosport worth buying for his contributions alone, in my humble opinion and I must admit that I had allowed Motorsport to drop completely off my radar for many a year (I don&#039;t think I&#039;d bought it regularly since the early 90s), until they signed-up the great Roebuck, who is genuinely one of the very greatest F1 writers there is.  So, I&#039;m now in a tricky situation - I like bits of all of them, and my magazine bill is going to go through the roof!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I enjoy Autosport and Motorsport and find their coverage of other formulas enjoyable &#8211; there is more to racing that JUST F1 (though not too much!).  I&#8217;ve always enjoyed F1 Racing and shamefacedly confess to enjoying Peter Windsor&#8217;s writing &#8211; I find his insight&#8217;s into the various drivers techniques and psychology to be utterly fascinating.  Mark Hughes makes Autosport worth buying for his contributions alone, in my humble opinion and I must admit that I had allowed Motorsport to drop completely off my radar for many a year (I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d bought it regularly since the early 90s), until they signed-up the great Roebuck, who is genuinely one of the very greatest F1 writers there is.  So, I&#8217;m now in a tricky situation &#8211; I like bits of all of them, and my magazine bill is going to go through the roof!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153803</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153803</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read Motorsport Magazine often, and you are right Keith their bias isn&#039;t really F1 but they do give their F1 articles a kind of life u do not find in many magazines they are more for the nostalgic feel, however, even a race held just yesterday is made to feel like one held perhaps a few decades earlier, more especially with the way they present their pictures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read Motorsport Magazine often, and you are right Keith their bias isn&#8217;t really F1 but they do give their F1 articles a kind of life u do not find in many magazines they are more for the nostalgic feel, however, even a race held just yesterday is made to feel like one held perhaps a few decades earlier, more especially with the way they present their pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartyP</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153767</link>
		<dc:creator>MartyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153767</guid>
		<description>I’ve been having this very argument internally for the past few months so it’s interesting to read the comments here.

I’ve had a subscription to F1 racing since ’97, not long after it began. More recently I’ve picked up a subscription to Motorsport Magazine and am starting to wonder if that will be the only one I hang onto.

F1 racing is still a decent mag, but I think the articles in Motorsport have more depth and variety. I also like the fact that I can open Motorsport and learn something about sportscar racing in the 70’s, or some semi-obscure F1 driver. When I open F1 Racing, there is little to learn other than the topic of their ‘Wheel to Wheel’ quiz.

I’m a Grand Prix history buff so my opinion will be pretty biased, but I will likely keep my F1 Racing subscription simply because I’m afraid of what I might miss, and not because I think it is better value than Motorsport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been having this very argument internally for the past few months so it’s interesting to read the comments here.</p>
<p>I’ve had a subscription to F1 racing since ’97, not long after it began. More recently I’ve picked up a subscription to Motorsport Magazine and am starting to wonder if that will be the only one I hang onto.</p>
<p>F1 racing is still a decent mag, but I think the articles in Motorsport have more depth and variety. I also like the fact that I can open Motorsport and learn something about sportscar racing in the 70’s, or some semi-obscure F1 driver. When I open F1 Racing, there is little to learn other than the topic of their ‘Wheel to Wheel’ quiz.</p>
<p>I’m a Grand Prix history buff so my opinion will be pretty biased, but I will likely keep my F1 Racing subscription simply because I’m afraid of what I might miss, and not because I think it is better value than Motorsport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/comment-page-2/#comment-153735</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 07:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/03/26/f1-racing-vs-motorsport/#comment-153735</guid>
		<description>I mentioned last year that Windsor has been the biggest flag waver for modern GP where races are won and lost by following another driver, waiting for them to pit, driving a fast lap and exiting your stop in front. (exactly what Kimi did on Sunday and has done on numerous ocassions. We seem to go nuts about what a ballsy and pure race driver he is yet no-one has brought up how boring and un-F1 that tactic that is!)

If he and the magazine were real advocates of the Sport they would be 
1. Baying for Max&#039;s blood
2. Pointing out what a shifty bugger Bernie is
and
3. Pointing out what complete rubbish a lot of F1 races are, instead of fawning over them.

A final straw, they have Eddie Jordan as a contributer. A man whose credibility was savaged by the UK courts. Lets get someone honest to contribute eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned last year that Windsor has been the biggest flag waver for modern GP where races are won and lost by following another driver, waiting for them to pit, driving a fast lap and exiting your stop in front. (exactly what Kimi did on Sunday and has done on numerous ocassions. We seem to go nuts about what a ballsy and pure race driver he is yet no-one has brought up how boring and un-F1 that tactic that is!)</p>
<p>If he and the magazine were real advocates of the Sport they would be<br />
1. Baying for Max&#8217;s blood<br />
2. Pointing out what a shifty bugger Bernie is<br />
and<br />
3. Pointing out what complete rubbish a lot of F1 races are, instead of fawning over them.</p>
<p>A final straw, they have Eddie Jordan as a contributer. A man whose credibility was savaged by the UK courts. Lets get someone honest to contribute eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 10/24 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 476/480 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 08:31:58 -->
