Comments on: Mosley hit by further sex allegations

By: vedorosso

vedorosso — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:42:24 +0000

Though… Max could always explains, that on the video, he was spanking the Nazis.
He could almost look as the nice guy in the story.

Metaphorically spanking, but literally banging.
We should cut the guy some slacks…. that was an amazing performance for an almost 70 years old guy.

By: Samambaia de Plastico

Samambaia de Plastico — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:45:05 +0000

I am scared with the last developments of this case.I can understand that some don´t like Mosley and take advantage of it, but people such as Niki Lauda, Jackie Stewart or any other driver have no moral to criticize Max, in their heyday they did a lot more than him, the difference is nobody caught them on video…What is this suddenly wave of morality sweeping the globe?This "Big Brother" intruding on people lives between four walls?Beware, you can be next!

By: Steven Roy

Steven Roy — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 10:10:03 +0000

I guess Clive got it right in his blog entry A Song for Max http://madtv.me.uk/f1insight/default.aspx?blogid=258 when he suggested printed the lyrics to a Madness song which included the following lines How can you show your face, When you're a disgrace to the human race?

By: Keith Collantine

Keith Collantine — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:36:58 +0000

From today's report in the Telegraph:

According to one source, Mosley's deepening madness led to a barrage of insults against the people of Bahrain delivered in a telephone exchange with Ecclestone after receiving the letter inviting him not to darken the paddock door in Sakhir. Ecclestone was in the presence of the crown prince at the time, who it is believed heard every word. Mosley later called back to apologise to his majesty in person. What a mess.

By: Steven Roy

Steven Roy — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:43:33 +0000

I should have said the quote is from
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns20223.html

By: Steven Roy

Steven Roy — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:42:33 +0000

"The World Council’s only concern is whether that list is accurate and truthful," he said. "We are not concerned with whether there are issues over how that is obtained. Unless there is evidence that it is forged or inaccurate, we will take it on its face value."

The quote is Max’s comment on the McLaren texts so if that is his honest opinion he should not care whether his activities came to light after an invasion of privacy. Of course there is one rule for Mosley/Ecclestone/Ferrari and another for eveyone else. Seems odd that someone who doesn’t care how information is obtained has called an EGA to discuss an invasion of his privacy.

By: Michael Counsell

Michael Counsell — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:09:28 +0000

But it could be perceived that way and perceptions are what matters… Or maybe I’ve picked up too much from F1 websites over the years.

By: Keith Collantine

Keith Collantine — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:58:30 +0000

I thought it made sense. I didn’t agree with it though.

By: Michael Counsell

Michael Counsell — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:53:32 +0000

Post 28 doesn’t make sense can it be deleted?

By: Michael Counsell

Michael Counsell — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:52:44 +0000

Re-reporting it only creates the perpetuates scandal which is supposed to be a bad thing.