Posted on | Author Keith Collantine

Fernando Alonso, Renault, Interlagos, 2005, 470150

Ron Dennis and Max Mosley have never been the best of friends. Mosley once said of Dennis:

Ron has no role in the FIA Formula 1 World Championship apart from that granted him, in common with other teams, by the Concorde Agreement. Unfortunately he find all this rather difficult to understand.

Several years later, and having only recently deflected suggestions he himself was about to resign, I suspect Dennis is quietly enjoying the significant but indirect role McLaren has played in bringing the Mosley presidency to the brink of its demise.

The first domino

In 2005 the CEO of Renault and Nissan, Carlos Ghosn, was taking his time over whether to commit his team to a long-term future in Formula 1.

This made his star driver Fernando Alonso uneasy. Even as he raced his R25 to victory in the championship he was privately becoming concerned that the team he had been with for four years wouldn’t be around very much longer.

And so when he finished third in the Brazilian Grand Prix behind the two McLarens, and by doing so claiming the drivers’ championship, he mentioned in passing to Dennis that he should like to drive for the team one day.

This suited Dennis perfectly. Late in 2005 he must have already been wondering about the long-term future of his new signing for the team, Juan Pablo Montoya, who had missed several races early in the year due to a non-racing injury.

And he must also have suspected that Ferrari were making overtures to his other driver Kimi Raikkonen, about joining their team. And now the new champion was offering to drive for him. He probably couldn’t have got his pen out quickly enough, and two months later the deal was announced.

The first domino had fallen in a chain of events leading to the crisis that now engulfs the president of the FIA.

It all goes wrong for McLaren

To Dennis, having Alonso join the team in 2007 was perfect. He could pair the multiple race-winning champion with the rookie Lewis Hamilton. Dennis’s protege had romped to the Formula Three Euroseries title in 2005 and claimed the GP2 championship the following year.

But as we all know, it didn’t quite work out that way. Not only did Hamilton and Alonso fall out in spectacular fashion, but McLaren found themselves facing an investigation into whether they had used information gleaned illegally for Ferrari.

Mosley pursued the case with his trademark vigour – but to some his effort to prosecute McLaren looked less like justice and more like the execution of a personal grudge.

Martin Brundle, a McLaren driver in 1994, described the investigation as a “witch hunt” in a column for the Sunday Times. A fuming Mosley asked the FIA to begin a legal action against the newspaper, which they agreed to in December last year.

The Mosley scandal

Last week, Mosley found himself explaining to a shocked world why the News of the World had published a story alleging that he had participated in a Nazi-themed bondage session with a number of prostitutes.

Many have drawn a connection between the FIA’s lawsuit agains the Sunday Times, and the News of the World expose, as both are owned by media mogul Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation.

The F1 world is now waiting to see if Mosley jumps from his position as president before he is (surely inevitably) pushed by the FIA Senate.

Meanwhile I suspect Dennis is not too distressed that one of the dominos that fell when his team were fined $100m by Mosley last year may now topple the president.

51 comments on “Dominoes”

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3
  1. If you try to argue for something by claiming those who don’t agree with you are unintelligent you automatically weaken your position.

    There are many reasons why people might have misgivings about what these developments have revealed about Mosley’s character.

    Even ignoring the Nazi stuff we still are left wondering whether some of the famously harsh verdicts Mosley has doled out as President of the FIA (McLaren’s fine, Toyota’s ban from rallying) were because he thought they were correct, or because he gets a thrill out of punishing people. Faith in his governance has been irrevocably damaged.

  2. Thanks, GeorgeK. 

    Green Flag. Think Rupert Murdoch, not Ron Dennis. Ron wouldn’t stoop to that level, but Murdoch owns the newspaper being sued by Max, as well as the NOTW. 

    You know what they say, don’t get into a wrestling match with a pig; you’ll just get muddy and the pig will enjoy it.

  3. Mosley deserves everything he gets. it happens to everyone everywhere and its a great way of bringing us back down to earth, all be it with a thud, when our heads get to big. it will hopefully teach him to be less arrogant idiots and hypocritical.

    "beware the ides of march"

  4. The guys from Grand prix came to arena finally. They have done the two important points in matter:  “1) The latest indication of the impact of Mosley’s adventures came yesterday with US comedian Jon Stewart mocking the FIA President on the hugely successful Daily Show.Jay Leno, another talk show host, described Mosley as "the head of Formula 1 racing" used the story to complain about the strength of the Euro against the dollar, saying that American politicians can only afford one hooker, while in Europe one can get five for the same price.Let us not forget that is the kind of market penetration that F1 would love to have in America.Sadly, the coverage was not positive.

    2) It is perhaps a tragedy in the true meaning of the word: a drama in which the main character is brought to ruin as a consequence of a tragic flaw or a moral weakness.These are sad and distressing times for the sport. They may also be sad and distressing for Mosley, but facing up to the realities is not something that should not be done at the expense of a sport in which are invested the aspirations and passions of millions across the world.By not resigning Mosley has left himself open to the charge that HE CARES NOTHING FOR THE SPORT.And that is yet another reason why he must resign.”
    (from grand prix)

  5. Someone elsewhere also pointed out Murdoch’s reason for sacking Max may have more to do with ITV losing the broadcast rights than Martin Brundle getting sued.

    In my heart of hearts I hope Murdoch did it for the sheer joy of watching Max suffer, but it’s usually about money or wounded ego.

  6. GeorgeK, I really agreed with you… This is what a have in common with Max, this kind of sadism feeling to see him gradually going in down…

  7. What about the poor hookers? Most people would spend 100 pounds per hour to avoid Mr Mosley. 

  8. Max upset Rupert Murdoch by threatening to sue one of his papers and Rupert like Max believes he is the centre of the universe and responds like a rabid dog to any attack.  Before Max could organise a law suit Murdoch has totally discredited him and made him a laughing stock.

    I keep reading that there is no Nazi element to the video.  We have seen 90 seconds of a five hour video so we have no idea what it shows.

  9. "In my heart of hearts I hope Murdoch did it for the sheer joy of watching Max suffer"

    Oh, I wouldn’t put it past Murdoch that this might be the only reason why he/they did it.

    "I fail to see how anyone with any semblance of intelligence can think that Max deserves to be sacked because of this."

    Rohan, where do you live? The planet of the superspankers where everyone marches around naked offering free sex to the tune of Wagner?

  10. A passing spankophile enjoying the show
    10th April 2008, 14:22

    The planet of the superspankers where everyone marches around naked offering free sex to the tune of Wagner?

    Oh dear.  Looks as if I’m under video surveillance too.

    (Sorry, I couldn’t resist.)

  11. Mohammed ben Sulayem, president of the Automobile and Touring Club of the United Arab Emirates, said he still totally supported Mosley.
    Abu Dhabi is one of the states of the United Arab Emirates.
    Abu Dhabi is due to hold its first F1 GP next year.
    The track in Abu Dhabi is accompanied by a Ferrari World amusement park.
    Abu Dhabi’s government-owned Mubadala Development Company holds a five per cent stake in Ferrari and also sponsors the Scuderia.
    Whilst rivals McLaren are 30 per cent owned by Bahrain’s Mumtalakat Holding Company.
    Am I just being cynical, or does there seem to be some back scratching going on here ?
    Undoubtedly there are going to be many ‘hidden agendas’ involved before the big one on the 3rd June.

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.