Bad safety car rules catch out Heidfeld

Nick Heidfeld, Fernando Alonso, Barcelona, 2008, 470150

Formula 1’s ill thought-out safety car rules ruined Nick Heidfeld’s race today. The BMW driver was leading when the safety car came out following Heikki Kovalainen’s crash, and even though he had two laps of fuel to spare he was forced to pit while the pit lane was closed, meaning he incurred an unavoidable penalty.

How long is it going to take them to fix these rules? We’ve known since last year they weren’t working properly. I even pointed it out in the 2007 season preview.

Everyone remembers the row that broke out at McLaren over their management of the safety car rules at Monaco. And at Canada Fernando Alonso and Nico Rosberg’s races were spoiled by the appearance of the safety car.

Complaining about the rules after today’s race BMW’s Mario Theissen acknowledged the teams are trying to get the rules changed before those two races, which often see several safety car appearances:

We tried to call Nick in but it was maybe two seconds too late – he had just passed the pitlane entry so there was no choice.

We could do another two laps and then we had to call him in. We knew it would be a 10-second penalty but there was nothing we could do about it. I know the team managers and the FIA are discussing this rule already and I hope they will come up with a solution soon.

It would be good if we get something before these races.

They clearly need to put in a short-term fix, such as only having the pits closed for a maximum of one lap, so that team know to always leave one lap’s worth of fuel in their cars.

In the long-term, I think they should just ban refuelling (which they couldn’t do tomorrow because the teams would need time to build larger fuel tanks). Allow the cars to make tyres stops if they want, but ban refuelling during the races.

It doesn’t make the races exciting anyway – I can’t remember a single race where I thought “wow, what an exciting strategic contest” but I can think of dozens that left me buzzing because of a scintillating pass or battle for position.

Advert | Go Ad-free

38 comments on Bad safety car rules catch out Heidfeld

1 2 3
  1. Rohan said on 27th April 2008, 19:10

    Maybe it could be changed so that the pits open as soon as all cars have caught up to the safety car. No idea whether or not that would work or not, though.

  2. Assuming it’s early enough in the race, I agree with Rohan – as soon as the last car passes the pit entrance then the pitlane should open.  That would mean they could start pitting next time round and as the safety car would be in the way then they couldn’t rush round just to pit.

  3. Pedro Andrade said on 27th April 2008, 19:29

    Rohan: I believe that’s exactly what happens now.

  4. Journeyer said on 27th April 2008, 19:51

    I just have a question about these safety car rules.  The way I see it, F1’s SC rules are practically identical to the caution rules Indycar and NASCAR have.  Why do their teams seem perfectly alright with it while the F1 teams keep on having problems with it?  I’ve always thought of it as: if the NASCAR and Indycar teams can live with it, surely the F1 teams can live with it too?

  5. Robert McKay said on 27th April 2008, 20:19

    Indycar has a related but separate system, at least on ovals (not sure if it’s the same on street courses): if this is nonsense correct me, I might have misunderstood it. If the SC comes out, the pitlane closes. If you absolutely need to stop, you are allowed to come in, but literally ONLY for a "splash and dash" – enough fuel to keep you going until the pitlane opens proper, and then you can make your pitstop proper.

    That’s better, but not perfect – it’ll still ruin your track position.

    But I think the American oval mentality tend to chalk up this misfortune a bit differently to the European road race mentality – they have so many "full course cautions" (SC’s) that people’s races are routinely ruined by this sort of thing and so noone really bothers about it. Couple that with the fuel-saving ethos of the oval races and you see that this sort of thing tennds to just be accepted as "one of those things". In F1 SC’s are fairly uncommon (Canada apart) and people getting screwed happens a lot less (though still too much and too drastically for my liking).

  6. Gabriel said on 27th April 2008, 21:44

    I just think we forgot to mention in all this how well Heidfeld was doing – he still had 2 laps of fuel in the car. Could have given Hamilton a run for his money today (the Ferrari’s definitely toned down their engines – they were quicker than it seemed today)

  7. Scott Joslin said on 27th April 2008, 22:18

    This rule has to change! Imagine the final race of the season, two guys head to head for the title and one of them is bitten by this stupid safety car rule giving the other guy the title – how hollow would that be! I agree in the long run we should ban refueling, it is expensive and dangerous.

    Why not give retrospective bans for drivers that go through the 3 yellow flag posts before the accident area too fast. Make these big and punishing penalties to scare drivers off from driving fast while there are yellow flags and a safety car. If they have the power to remove them from the result of that race or the next one, I am sure drivers would respect that.

  8. Michael Counsell said on 27th April 2008, 23:23

    I think they just need to be cleverer about picking up the leader, getting everyone queued up and opening the pitlane.  Heidfeld had to have some kind of penalty otherwise he would have gained a massive advantage over everyone who could have pitted legally and emerged behind Heidfeld.  All they had to do was shuffle him to the back of the queue the stop go penalty is excessive.

    Safety cars are random events that can happen and is one of the reasons for wanting to top earlier than your rivals, its just a strategical aspect that evens itself out in the end.  On the other hand stopping early can put you behind slower cars who haven’t stopped yet or there might be a gap.  Its just as uncontrollable as a safety car coming out but more common and less damaging.

  9. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 27th April 2008, 23:30

    I don’t agree on several points, Michael:

    How would Heidfeld have gained a massive advantage? He was in front of a queue of cars, all of which had about 20 laps more fuel than him?

    And it doesn’t "even itself out in the end" – last year Alonso and Rosberg got screwed at Montreal and that it was – it never happened to anyone else (as far as I can remember anyway). The points Alonso might have scored that day would have been quite handy come Interlagos…

  10. theRoswellite said on 27th April 2008, 23:31

    Agree with Scott Joslin, the key question from Keith was, "How long is it going to take them to fix these rules?"  The answer may be right after a championship is ruined.  Hopefully not. 

    You’ll have to forgive the FIA, they’re a bit preoccupied at the moment.

  11. Journeyer said on 28th April 2008, 1:52

    Don’t worry, Roswellite.  At the rate this championship is going, I don’t think we need to worry about it getting ruined this year.

  12. In these days of telemetries and computers smart enough to know all manner of things, why don’t the FIA only punish someone for pitting under SC when they didn’t really need to? After all, surely it would be a small matter to find out who was doing their last last on vapours of fuel and therefore had no choice but to pit, and those who were just taking advantage of the situation.

  13. Can’t they just impose a maximum speed limit round the track, so that not only people needing to pit would do so safely and without gaining excess advantage over others, but also reducing the possibility of drivers spinning while trying to catch the Safety Car queue again? Oh sorry, that was prevented when Bernie took out the fibreoptic loop at the end of 2002 because he couldn’t get the team bosses to pay £40m to subsidise his strategically and tactically flawed foray into digital pay-per-view television…

  14. Frequent safety car ‘interventions’ normally will lead to (the strategic race) loosing its steam… The racing momentum being disturbed.

    How about going for the extreme? …No safety car, just yellow flagging! Sounds crazzzzzy, but will be exiting racing.

  15. Oliver said on 28th April 2008, 4:39

    It will be unfair to change the rules now, because it has already affected some drivers already, even if these same drivers get penalized in future again, it will be consistent with the current rules. While the rule hopes to solve one problem, it creates a problem of its own and does nothing to reward the hard work of drivers and teams, rather it only serves to punish. F1 is not musical chairs.

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.