Circuit to be partly resurfaced but will it be enough to save the Grand Prix?

Timo Glock, Circuit Gilles Villeneuve, Toyota, 470150

The Canadian Grand Prix organisers are hurriedly re-surfacing part of the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve following the break-up that occured during today’s qualifying session.

But is this just a case of too little too late? And does the sensitive political climate in F1 increase the chance that the race might be cancelled?

The executive vice president of the Canadian Grand Prix, Francois Dumontier, has explained reasons why he thinks the break-up of the circuit’s surface has occured:

Aggressive adhesion of grooved tyres, removal of traction control systems and the actual physical configuration of the hairpin corner itself could all be probable causes for this situation.

Perhaps ‘failure to learn from past lessons’ should be on this list as well, because these problems have affected the last two Canadian Grands Prix. However the situation looks much worse this year, with the track coming apart early on in the weekend rather than during the F1 race itself.

F1 is sharing the Circuit Gilles Villeneuve with IMSA GT3 Cup racers this weekend which will also be giving the track’s surface a pounding.

Many of the drivers have been vocal about the problems. Mark Webber has led the complaints saying:

I think we’ll need to use motocross bikes, as it’s not realistic in a Formula One car, you’ll need to drive on the grass or on the inside of the hairpin.

Kimi Raikkonen added:

The car has been good all weekend but this morning was even very good and going into qualifying is quite a joke with the circuit. The circuit breaks down and it is like you missed the corner because there is so much sand.

I lost so much time in Turn 10 I couldn’t turn around and went straight on. We will see how it is in the race but it will be a nightmare. We have a lot of laps and it broke up after two laps so it will be interesting.

Lewis Hamilton, however, seems nonplussed:

I am not fussed. It is not going to cause me any problems as I know how to drive around it now. For sure it is better if there isn’t a problem and if they can fix it, then great.

That’s got ‘setting yourself up for a fall’ written all over it…

But it’s easy to be critical of the circuit’s problems from a distance. But I imagine maintaining a Formula 1-standard racing circuit in that part of the world would brings with it greater problems than we have in Europe. The bitterly cold Montreal winters must wreak havoc with the tarmac.

However this presents F1 with the kind of problem it has not seen for several years (see the earlier post ‘When tracks go crask’ for more). Yes, in 2005 most of the cars were unable to race at Indianapolis, but that was principally a problem with their Michelin tyres and not the circuit itself.

And given the turbulent political climate at the moment the timing could not be more sensitive. Bernie Ecclestone has said he wants to take control of F1 away from Max Mosley and the FIA.

So what happens now if Mosley announces they have to cancel the race because the track isn’t safe enough? It’s not inconceivable: although FIA race director Charlie Whiting has given his blessing to the resurfacing, it’s only taing place at the Casino hairpin, and not further up the track where Mark Webber had his crash, for example.

If Ecclestone let the race go ahead and it degenerated into a wreck-strewn farce it would be a gigantic political coup for Mosley. But cancelling the race would be extremely expensive and frustrate the teams who support him. So what should he do?

Advert | Go Ad-free

30 comments on Circuit to be partly resurfaced but will it be enough to save the Grand Prix?

  1. theRoswellite said on 8th June 2008, 1:09

    This track is very dangerous under “normal” conditions. Any decisions should be based on questions of safety.

    If the race is held for “commercial” reasons, and an accident occurs, the repercussions could reach beyond Ecclestone and the FIA, especially if non-combatants are involved.

    Question? If the main problem is only one corner, can they run the entire race with that area under a yellow flag?

  2. Scott Joslin said on 8th June 2008, 1:34

    you don’t get this at silverstone or Magny Course! yet still Montreal is allowed to get away with substandard basics!

  3. Eric M. said on 8th June 2008, 1:43

    I think the we should really hope for a wet race. If the surface is wet, the tires won’t have the grip they need to actually peel up bits of asphalt.

  4. It would be great to see some pictures of the broken tarmac. This has been an ongoing issue there and really can’t be allowed to continue, but in tomorrows race it will really test the skill of all drivers. That may have been a boast on Hamilton’s part, but then again, he may be right: he may be the best at adapting to a changing situation.

  5. Journeyer said on 8th June 2008, 2:14

    “So what happens now if Mosley announces they have to cancel the race because the track isn’t safe enough?”

    Will this even happen? If Canada supported Mosley in Paris, Mosley will support them today.

  6. Architrion said on 8th June 2008, 2:19

    This Lewis is awesome… seems he is the only man in the world who knows how to pass the hairpin, even gaining time…

    all the other ¿drivers? seems like a bunch of donkeys… Nice to have him to give us a lesson. If Senna could raise his head he could take good notes about it too..

  7. The Canadian Automobile Association was a signatory to the letter from the 24 groups calling Mosley to step down. But the CAA doesn’t have anything to do with the race.

  8. Why is it always North American tracks that need renovation?

  9. As Keith pointed out, the problem at Indianapolis was a tire issue, but Max refused the compromise. I would guess that Montreal’s problem is climatic. A few years ago the track was being examined closely on a Friday because it had rained on a hot day and Charlie Whiting had ordered a resurface with quick-drying cement. That part of Canada gets very hot and humid in the summer months and a maybe 4 months where it is frozen. Also, it isn’t really used the rest of the year, and all of a sudden there’s is the GP and support races pounding away at an unstable surface. My guess is the only way to fix it is a complete resurfacing.

  10. Toby said on 8th June 2008, 3:43

    Spot on Scott! Every year we hear about the imminent demise of the British and French GP’s – with especially Silverstone copping a whack from Bernie for having “sub-standard” facilities. But here we are again at the crumbling Montreal circuit, and not a word from Mr E. Tut, tut….

    Keith, I think the area where Webber and Trulli spun is also crumbling. Turns 6 and 7, I think. Add the marble problems and this race is going to be chaotic!

    I bet the other drivers are scratching their heads at Hamilton’s ability to deal with that hairpin. He was the only guy not over-revving, spinning wheels and getting out of shape on the exit. Raikkonen was even 2-tenths up after the second sector on his final run, then ended up over a second slower than Hamilton! Reminds me of MS’ final sectors at Hockenheim 2005(?) – Waaaay faster.

  11. Arun said on 8th June 2008, 3:51

    Only hope for me to see the cars were Canada, now I hope I can do it tomorrow since I’ve spent quite a bit of money now.

  12. Could someone explain to me: “Aggressive adhesion of grooved tyres… could all be probable causes for this situation”

    Wouldn’t the grooves make them less adhesive/less damaging? As opposed to slicks? I just don’t understand why the term “grooved” even needed to be brought in to the explanation.

  13. Ben Coburn said on 8th June 2008, 6:27

    I think the idea is that the grooved tires have been made more adhesive over their smaller area in an attempt to give similar total grip to the slicks. This damages the track more, because the surface cares about force/area, not total force.

  14. I believe that because of the reduction in grip due to the grooves the tire compounds have gotten softer to become grippier. So they provide a great deal of grip during their optimal window of performance, but degrade quicker. Tires with more grip will pull harder on the surface they are pushed into.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.