Comments on: Max Mosley wins News of the World case

By: DG

DG — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:31:06 +0000

Further to my last comments I see that Max has in fact been meeting with Bernie, CVC and the Teams to sort out the future of F1, so I am put in my place!
I just hope its not leading the sport into more trouble!

By: DG

DG — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:54:05 +0000

Alianora – its basically the same whether its the current Archbishop or his predecessor. Lord Carey has realised as we have that its a rich man’s get out clause. This will allow anyone within the media spotlight to deny doing anything illegal or immoral – and think of the number of footballers, actors and MPs that will help!
As I said before, the fact that Mad Max used his ‘privacy’ to sway a public vote is wrong, and now the fact that he is suing the paper for ‘Defamation of Character’ when in the ‘privacy’ case he never denied what he was seen to do on the video is just bizarre…
Shouldn’t he be getting behind his desk in Paris and sorting out the problems in the motorsport world? Bernie and the CVC seem a step nearer to running F1 and where is the FIA fightback – especially since he was voted in as the only man to save the FIA?
Its all a load of rubbish! By 2010 Max will ‘retire’ and be running the newly powerful FOM with Bernie!

By: Alianora La Canta

Alianora La Canta — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:37:58 +0000

And that will teach me to read news stories a bit more carefully. It was the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey, who decided to wade into the debate, complaining about free speech and public morality being damaged by the Max Mosley ruling.

By: Alianora La Canta

Alianora La Canta — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 21:29:37 +0000

The Archbishop of Canterbury has waded into the debate. Would you believe that the deputy head of the Anglican church (below the Queen) is siding with the News of the World?

I understand the theological reasoning behind it, but still, it remains surreal.

By: Alianora La Canta

Alianora La Canta — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:49:02 +0000

There’s something else I’ve just thought about. If Mr Mosley prizes his privacy so highly, why is he exposing his private life for a pair of libel charges? Exposing it for a privacy charge is one thing, but exposing it again afterwards?!?

By: scheherazade al tellawy

scheherazade al tellawy — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:45:27 +0000

I BELIVE MAX IN HIS PAST LIFE WAS ABUSED AND IN HIS DARK

CELL TAKEN AND WIPPED AND WIPPED UNTILL THE END , AND

THAT IS WHY HE LIKES THAT IT BRING OUT HIS REINCARNATED

MEMORRY ,PEOPLE DO FREAKY SICK ACT CAUSE OF THEIR PAST

LIFE AS IT LEAVES WEAKNESS IN THEIR PRESENT LIFE, HE

SHOULD WASH HIS KARME BY GIVING CHARITY THE MONEY

AWARDED TO HIM , HE DESERVE NON OF THAT , SUCH TWISTED

JUDGEMENT , BUT NOTW SHALL BE BLESSED FOR EXPOSING THE

THESE TYPE OF PEOPLE INTO PUPLIC JUDGEMENT AND THAT IS

WHAT DOSE COUNT JUSTICE DOSN,T EXIST BUT EMPTY USLESS

WORD .MAX WILL PAY MORE PRICE AS HIS LIFE TURNING UP

SIDE DOWN . IS IT WORTH IT MAX!!!

By: scheherazade al tellawy

scheherazade al tellawy — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:53:47 +0000

news of the world need an award for exposing so many dirty men with high profile and polished image out side but in fact they are a punch of sleazy freaks and very low
evil dark side in the core of their souls iam psychic and i know notw sensed his action and possibility unvield his primitive mentality . good work notw wish you more freedom.

By: v8

v8 — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:32:33 +0000

max mosley should be ashamed of his actions(pervasive) despite his legal triumph as he is on a pedestal and everyone is looking up to him. whether his acts were in a nazi theme or not is irrelevant.

By: Arnet

Arnet — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:26:05 +0000

Beyond the legal and reporting splitting of hairs, the plain fact is that it was a Nazi themed orgy, it just didn’t have any Swastikas in place. Anything German involving guards and prisoners having their heads examined for lice, I mean come on, is he fantasizing about being thrown into a present day prison for being caught speeding?

Mosley is more like his Father than he would ever admit to, despite his protestations to the contrary. He’s clever enough to know that he can live out his fantasy in his head without going all SS decor. That is why the judge ruled against the paper, because the party was ust vague enough to get away with.

By: Alianora La Canta

Alianora La Canta — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:58:43 +0000

Polak, the case Max won yesterday was about privacy. The accurate reporting case was opened today, presumably using yesterday’s victory as part of the evidence.