Refuelling rig fires and failures hit race

Several drivers had their Hungarian Grand Prix spoiled by problems with the refuelling equipment – which worryingly caused a number of fires.

Sebastien Bourdais, Rubens Barrichello and Nico Rosberg were among the drivers affected. But what was the cause of the problems?

Sebastien Bourdais was the first to suffer a problem when he pitted on lap 31. Fuel leaked from the vale and caught fire, and the team doused the car with extinguisher foam before sending him back on track again. It happened again at his second stop as well, as he explained afterwards:

It all went to hell at the first pit stop, as the guys had to use the fire extinguisher and I got a lot of foam on my visor.

It happened again at the second stop and this time I had foam inside and outside my visor and couldn’t see a thing so had to make another stop to get it cleaned.

Rubens Barrichello also suffered a fire when he pitted and the team had to switch to the reserve fuel rig to get fuel into the car.

Team boss Nick Fry suggested the problem was caused by the heat at the Hungaroring causing leftover fuel in the system to expand, causing the valve to malfunction. But although the temperature was above 30C, it’s not unusual for F1 races to be held in hotter weather.

Honda had a problem with their fuel rig in the British Grand Prix as well, and afterwards Ross Brawn said Barrichello would have finished second that day (instead of third) without the delay.

Nico Rosberg was also delayed by a problem with his refuelling rig, although there was no fire.

I’ve never been a fan of refuelling – I think it brings nothing to F1 except for an added expense and safety hazard. To me this is just another good reason to get rid of it.

Advert | Go Ad-free

35 comments on Refuelling rig fires and failures hit race

1 2 3
  1. verasaki said on 3rd August 2008, 17:26

    if anyone at the fia was serious about cutting costs then re-fueling should have been the no brainer place to start. it’s the one thing that could be done without much effort on anyone’s part. how much does it costs to maintain and transport those rigs? or replace them? are they still using the original rigs or have they had to replace them over the years?

  2. M Smith said on 3rd August 2008, 18:09

    Exactly, verasaki. If the FIA is so set on cutting costs, banning refuelling is one easy step. I have no idea why they aren’t doing this for next years big rule changes. Refuelling doesn’t add much suspense to the races it just takes the racing away from the racetrack. Imagine all the times where drivers had to fight for position in the past, but with refuelling there’s no point because they can just wait for the strategy to do its job.

  3. cyanide said on 3rd August 2008, 18:10

    A couple of simple questions: How much fuel can these cars hold? Would the races have to be shortened if they were to ban refueling?

  4. Robert McKay said on 3rd August 2008, 18:48

    “A couple of simple questions: How much fuel can these cars hold? Would the races have to be shortened if they were to ban refueling?”

    Wrong way round. Because refuelling has been allowed, the teams have increasingly designed their cars to have ever smaller fuel tanks for various reasons. If refuelling was banned again they’d redesign them so that they were large enough for whatever race distance the FIA told them to.

    Refuelling should be banned. As Keith says it adds little, and the frustration a team/driver must feel when the fuel rigs go wrong out of their control must make them want to scream.

  5. Pingguest said on 3rd August 2008, 18:56

    I’m totally against refuelling, but because the current set of rules refuelling can’t be banned. The current engines use about 210 litres of fuel per race, while most teams have a fuel tank size of no more than 100-110 litres. A ban on refuelling would require more fuel efficient engines, but due to the ‘engine freeze’ these engine can’t be developed.

  6. Formula One could (should?) do away with refuelling. And, with Bridgestone being the sole tyre manufacturer, they should get rid of tyre changes, too. That way all the action should take place on the track, by the drivers, in stead of in the pit lane by, as it seams, an ever increasing number of mechanics per car.

    Adding to that, the FIA could limit the fuel tank size each season to enforce fuel efficient racing, which is good for the environment-friendly image of F1, plus it should save costs.

  7. Robert McKay said on 3rd August 2008, 19:29

    “Adding to that, the FIA could limit the fuel tank size each season to enforce fuel efficient racing, which is good for the environment-friendly image of F1, plus it should save costs.”

    I think Moto GP already does this, don’t they? Decrease the limit each season and making them more fuel efficient.

  8. Pedro Andrade said on 3rd August 2008, 19:41

    I think you missed Nakajima, who also had a small fire as he was leaving the pits.

  9. Number 38 said on 3rd August 2008, 21:55

    There’s NOTHING wrong with re-fueling……a 100 other motorsport series re-fuel. Who’s going to run LeMans on a single tank of fuel? or the Indy 500. Crackers I’ve run kart races and re-fueled (during the race). NASCAR has figured out how to do it……..what’s wrong with US ??? There are reasons for the spills and fires……find the problems and correct them.

  10. Cyanide, the races wouldn’t need to be shortened unless Max, in his environmental-image-centred planning, decides to make the fuel tank limit too small.

    This rig problem needs fixing, whether future seasons feature refuelling or not. There are seven more races to go this season and this problem could reoccur with severe consequences if it isn’t fixed. Flash fires are no fun.

  11. verasaki said on 3rd August 2008, 23:24

    number 38- are those other series using a rig that fuels at such a high output rate? the last i looked at nascar -and it’s been a while, admittedly, they were still using gravity feed. and even the old champ car series didn’t deliver fuel at the rate (i can’t recall what they used but i think it was a gravity based feed also)that f1 does and they had potential for some really serious damage since you couldn’t actually see the fuel burn.

    my point is that for f1 which doesn’t do a 500 miler, it’s always seemed rather like trying to jack up the drama than provide something necessary-and that in the case of f1 it’s an unnecessary expense.

  12. Unless F1 was to add enduro’s to the calendar (and I’d love to see that !) then I can’t see the point of refueling. I’m of the races-should-be-won-on-track school of thought.

  13. Wasn’t refuelling brought back into the sport in 1994 because drivers spent too much time trolling around trying to save fuel? Anyone who pushed for the full race distance would simply run out of juice. If refuelling was banned (again) I think it would reward efficiency over speed a little too much. I’d like to see the fastest driver win after pushing hard for 70 laps, rather than the most efficient driver win because he was able to best conserve his fuel. F1 should be about speed, not efficiency, and I thought that was part of the reason the FIA brought back refuelling eighteen years ago.

  14. Steve K said on 4th August 2008, 2:50

    Banning refueling just sounds silly in motorsports. Perhaps they can think of a more safer way to put fuel in the car. Speed TV says those things shoot 12 liters per second of fuel in the car. It needs to be the same for all, but does it need to be that fast? That might not be dangerous, but is it?

    Another question, IndyCars are fueled by ethonal, what does F1 use?

  15. Robert Mckay said on 4th August 2008, 8:31

    “There’s NOTHING wrong with re-fueling”

    But what’s right with it?

    Le Mans is an endurance race that lasts 24 hours, the comparison is pointless.

    There’s no refuelling in GP2. Does anyone care? No they don’t. Does anyone think the main thing that’s holding back GP2 is the lack of petrol-filling action? Surely not.

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.