Heikki Kovalainen: the driver debates
30th August 2008, 7:00 by Keith Collantine 38 Comments »

Heikki Kovalainen became an F1 winner in this year's Hungarian Grand Prix
Heikki Kovalainen has had an odd introduction to Formula 1. After bagging a seat with reigning champions Renault in 2007, he made his debut as the team hit a slump in performance.
He made a poor start to the year but quickly rallied, and beat his vastly more experienced team mate Giancarlo Fisichella on points over the course of the year.
Renault dropped him anyway – and though he found a new berth at an even more competitive team, he has faced the unenviable task of partnering Lewis Hamilton. How well is he doing?
Kovalainen impressed in GP2 in 2005. Despite not winning the championship (he was runner-up to Nico Rosberg) he showed consistency and speed… and some poor luck. Much the same can be said of his 2008 campaign so far.
Last year he made his F1 debut in an evil-handling Renault R27, and his maiden race was punctuated with several spins, leading Flavio Briatore to make his infamous remark that surely Kovalainen’s brother had been driving the car instead.
After a few races in the doldrums Kovalainen got a handle on the R27 and rebounded. At Montreal – the same race where current team mate Lewis Hamilton scored his first win – Kovalainen raced from 22nd to fourth.
From that point on the balance of power at Renault had shifted. Now Kovalainen was usually the team’s best hope for points, and at Fuji he put in a virtuouso drive in shocking weather to beat Kimi Raikkonen to second.
After such a successful turn-around it was, on the face of it, a surprise to see Renault let Kovalainen go. But in the real world, Renault had the chance to get Alonso back and they knew they were more likely to do that if they brought someone more financially beneficial to them – and less threatening to Alonso – so Nelson Piquet Jnr got the gig.
(I think Renault may come to regret that. Piquet’s form this season has been mixed at best, and Alonso is considering a move to Ferrari, or Honda, or both.)
Kovalainen landed on his feet however, stepping into Alonso’s vacant slot at McLaren. Rumours suggested the team wanted Nico Rosberg, but he wasn’t available, and considered Mark Webber, but cast him aside when he made one blunt remark too many.
Early in the season Kovalainen often looked capable of matching Hamilton for pace, but suffered some vile luck. The safety car ruined his race at Melbourne, he lost five places on the grid in Sepang, had a huge crash after a component failure in Barcelona and picked up a puncture on the first lap in Istanbul.
However in recent races Hamilton has had the edge. Kovalainen was left floundering in his team mate’s wake at Silverstone, and lagged behind at the Hockenheimring and Valencia.
He wasn’t quite on the pace at the Hungaroring either – but he was quicker than Raikkonen and the BMWs, and when events turned in his favour he was perfectly placed to collect his maiden win. It may have been fortunate, but given his luck early in the season only the hardest of hearts would have begrudged him it.
It came a few days after McLaren confirmed a one-year extension to Kovalainen’s contract. That is an endorsement of the form he has shown this year, but it carries hints that McLaren still have an eye on someone else for 2010, or are at least keeping their options open.
Martin Whitmarsh explained some of the ways he thinks Kovalainen has improved during the year:
Heikki’s much more adept at switching effortlessly between engine-saving, brake-saving and tyre-saving modes, and he knows exactly when to push, so the situation he encountered at the start of the year when he was dealing with slightly more tyre degradation is no longer a concern.
The reality is that Heikki’s particularly strong when he’s got the car in front in his sights. When he homes in on another competitor then his natural competitive instincts really come alive.
Now 27 points behind his team mate in the title race, Kovalainen will surely be relegated to playing the number two role soon. Although no driver wants to be subjugated to supporting his team mate’s title bid, Kovalainen is probably wise enough to see it as an opportunity to cement his evident popularity within the team.
Next year his luck may change, but if it does, will he have the raw pace to take on Hamilton in the same team? The jury’s still out on that. Give your verdict on Heikki Kovalainen below.
Read more about Heikki Kovalainen: Heikki Kovalainen biography





cyanide said on 30th August 2008, 7:52
I was really excited when Kovalainen made it into F1, after having heard of him so many times when he was still in junior formulas. And coming from Finland, I expected him to be as good as his compatriot Raikkonen, or even Hakkinen. But from what I’ve seen of him, there isn’t much that suggests he’s got a world championship winning season in him. I’m just an uneducated spectator on the sidelines and would love to be proven wrong though
Sush said on 30th August 2008, 9:10
I was somewhat disheartened with Heikki’s first win, I was willing him to blitz the opposition.
if you look at his career, its been somewhat like his current tour of F1, skipping from one team to the next every year, only when he’s settled into a team for a year that he’s gone and beaten everyone else and bagged himself a championship.
you could call him a social butterfly, little jovial fellow he is.
Cyanide, the kids got the talent, he won the race of champions, by beating not only shoe maker, but rally drivers in equal machinery.
Stealthman said on 30th August 2008, 9:44
Kovy’s actually done better this year than I thought he would. He’s a good driver, and he has the skills and speed to guarantee im another win this year or next year. On a different note, I had no idea that McLaren considered Mark Webber as a driver!
Roslan said on 30th August 2008, 10:25
He is really good driver but I don’t think he made of champions .
Derek said on 30th August 2008, 11:24
Kovy’s a nice young man, just like Coulthard was in the early years with McLaren, they seem to lack that killer instinct and aggression required to bag a world title. Whereas Hamilton is full of it! More so than any other contemporary driver including Raikkonen and Massa. Hamiliton has the same arrogance and self belief as Schumacher and Senna, only time will tell if he becomes as successful. By the way didn’t Schumacher stall that car on the start line in the final of the race of champions when Kovy went on to win.
sap said on 30th August 2008, 11:52
Since it’s clear that mclaren will have Lewis as their main driver for a while, it makes sense to have someone he gets on with, who’s competitive, can bring home constructors points and the odd win, but doesn’t threaten Lewis… (You think alonso is a bad loser? We know Lewis is worse)
I think kovy is the perfect driver to fill this role. I see it as mika/david type combination (except with nationalities switched!). I’m sure he has contributed to the harmony at mcl this year and he also seems like a really nice guy. As a long term mclaren fan, there’s no-one I’d rather have in that seat next year.
amy said on 30th August 2008, 12:16
I thought Kovy lasy year at Renault was absolutely fantastic! He drove really well and got results that his more experienced team mate could not. However, this year I do not think he has done such a good job as in races he just seems to drift off.
Sumedh said on 30th August 2008, 12:17
He is a Rubens Barichello or david coultahrd at best,
And when compared to Lewis, he seems even worse.
Ron said on 30th August 2008, 12:38
I agree, Heikki is a top-act, but not the ultimate winner. Much like Berger or DC in their spells at McLaren. I think he will do very well as number 2 to Hamilton. And yes, he’s defintely more mature tham Nelson -call me Junior when I’m in a good mood- Piquet. After all he should be happy that’s he’s the unofficial second driver at McLaren (picking up a win and some podiums) rather than Renault (getting a point or 3… out of 4 races).
bert said on 30th August 2008, 15:42
@ Stealthman do you have doubts about webber ???
he is one of f1 most talentet drivers i think.
Kovalainen is second driver , end of story.
Paige said on 30th August 2008, 19:05
I’m sorry guys, but I just can’t say that someone who beat Michael Schumacher in a straight fight in an equal car at the Race of Champions isn’t capable of winning a world championship.
Kovalainen is a tremendously talented and quick driver who has displayed terrific car control in his time in F1. He’s had a ridiculous amount of bad luck this year. If you take away the safety car at Albert Park and the tire failures at Catalunya and Istanbul (all races where he likely would have scored at least top-4 finishes, and probably a podium in Australia), then he’s probably 3rd in points right now just nine points behind Hamilton. That’s not too bad in his first year with the team.
Is he as good as Hamilton? No, but that doesn’t mean that he can’t beat him and win world championships, as Alain Prost has shown. (And Massa may show this year.)
Also, Kevin, there’s one driver you forgot who was rumored to be on McLaren’s list for this year, and who could be that driver who “McLaren is thinking about for 2010.” That man’s name is Sebastian Vettel.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sebastian_Vettel#Formula_One
Nick said on 30th August 2008, 19:49
Hamilton usually gets the better strategy so can’t really compare. I’d say Kov is on par with Hamilton as in he can only win when things go his way and having the best car, kind of like Fisichella.
Paige said on 30th August 2008, 21:44
Nick,
That’s ridiculous to say that Hamilton (and Kovalainen) can only win when things go his way and he has the best car.
Firstly, it’s damn near impossible to win in F1 when you DON’T have the best car and/or when things don’t go your way. So it’s somehow bogus to imply that the likes of Raikkonen, Kubica (who got his first win precisely because Hamilton and Raikkonen retired due to the pit lane accident), Alonso, or Massa (who is the champion of winning while having a ridiculously awesome car and good luck) are somehow Supermen who don’t need the best car and/or good luck to win. Every driver in F1 does.
Secondly, have you happened to watch five of the last six races he’s won? At Hungary last year, he beat Raikkonen even though the Ferrari was definitely faster. He just flat out creamed everyone else in the extreme rain at Fuji and Silverstone, displaying by far the best car control on the circuit. At Monaco, Ferrari had the best car (as they had throughout the early part of the year in the slow corners), yet Hamilton was able to outduel them in the rain and the dry/wet conditions and to pull away from them in the final stint under the safety car. And at Hockenheim this year, he was severely disadvantaged by a pit strategy blunder by McLaren, and yet was able to storm to the win.
ukk said on 30th August 2008, 21:50
Martin Whitmarsh’s judgement is VERY true: Heikki seems to be lacking the killer instinct of the true winner. He’s much better in playing the underdog, as btw many of the current drivers (i.e. Webber, Fisi, Trulli, Button, DC, Heidfeld, etc) and win only when the luck strikes unavoidably. A good support driver.
Paige said on 30th August 2008, 22:12
Here’s what Peter Windsor had to say about Heikki in 2004 after he beat both the best racing driver in the world at that point (Schumacher) and the best rally driver in the world (Loeb) to win the Race of Champions:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJyVe72cK5A
Some may not like Peter all that much, but I trust his opinion much more than the vast majority of people in F1. He knows this stuff.