Hamilton is moral victor in Spa thriller

2008 Belgian Grand Prix review

Lewis Hamilton celebrates his Spa win before the stewards took it from him

Lewis Hamilton celebrates his Spa win before the stewards took it from him

Lewis Hamilton won a thrilling Belgian Grand Prix – but the stewards’ decision to strip him of his hard-earned victory soured what would otherwise have been remembered as a magnificent race.

Kimi Raikkonen was poised to score a fourth consecutive win at Spa but Hamilton capitalised on a late rain shower to attack the Ferrari driver.

After a thrilling wheel-to-wheel duel Hamilton took the win as Raikkonen crashed. But after the race the stewards relegated Hamilton to third and handed victory to Felipe Massa.

Kimi Raikkonen takes the lead

The Belgian Grand Prix began and ended on a wet track but it was dry for the most part in between.

Lewis Hamilton got a perfect start from his 11th career pole position and scorched away from the chasing Ferraris.

Kimi Raikkonen took up second place by slipstreaming past team mate Felipe Massa at Kemmel but further back chaos broke out.

Jarno Trulli had made a sublime start, diving past a string of cars. But Toro Rosso’s Sebastien Bourdais braked too late at the first corner and brunched his nose into the back of Trulli’s Toyota.

Also in trouble was Heikki Kovalainen who bogged down terribly when the lights changed and tumbled down the order from third to 13th.

It got worse for Hamilton at the start of the second lap when Hamilton had a half-spin at the La Source hairpin. If he hadn’t pulled out such a large lead on the first tour he’d have fallen a long way back, but as it was he was able to rejoin in second behind Raikkonen.

Massa was third ahead of Fernando Alonso, who passed Mark Webber at Kemmel on the first lap. Trulli ran sixth before spinning at the chicane. Nelson Piquet Jnr took his place but slipped down the order after briefly taking Trulli’s place.

Heikki Kovalainen’s race gets worse

Kovalainen began to climb back through the field, taking Timo Glock, Nick Heidfeld, and then Piquet. Kubica surrendered seventh on lap eight but on the following lap a mis-timed move on Webber at the chicane tipped the Red Bull driver into a spin. Within a few minutes the stewards announced Kovalainen would get a drive-through penalty for causing an avoidable accident.

At the front Hamilton kept within range of Raikkonen. The McLaren was much faster than the Ferrari in sectors one and three, but lost over half a second per lap in sector two. The gap stayed at around a second as Massa fell to 5.6s adrift by lap nine.

Hamilton was first to pit on lap 11 and it worked perfectly for Ferrari as he came out of the pits behind Kovalainen. For some reason McLaren were not of a mind to get Kovalainen out of the way by bringing him in for his penalty, or a pit stop.

Raikkonen pitted on the following lap and came out with Sebastien Bourdais, Kubica and Kovalainen between himself and Hamilton. Once they had pitted, Raikkonen’s lead had grown to 5.6s, and Massa had reduced Hamilton’s advantage to 4.4s.

Kovalainen’s pit stop and penalty left him 15th, and he spent six laps stuck behind David Coulthard. He eventually cleared the Red Bull and on lap 28 put a (clean) pass on Webber for ninth.

Lewis Hamilton catches Raikkonen

At the front the status quo seemed settled. Hamilton could only take a tenth out of Raikkonen’s lead occasionally. The the final set of pit stops changed the picture.

First, Hamilton had a shorter stop and gained two seconds on Raikkonen. Then, with both cars on the harder compound tyre, Hamilton reduced Raikkonen’s lead initially, the McLaren seeming to heat the tyres up more quickly. By lap 28 Raikkonen’s lead was down to 2.4s, but by then the Ferrari was up to speed and the gap stabilised once again.

Alonso had taken fourth ahead of the Toro Rosso duo. Heidfeld was seventh after a poor pit stop for team mate Kubica. But a final belt of rain was about to change everything.

As the rain began to fall lightly from lap 39 so Hamilton began to reduce Raikkonen’s lead further. By lap 40 it was under a second, but Hamilton had a brief moment of oversteer at the chicane and lost over a second.

Fight to the finish

As lap 42 began Hamilton cut 1.4s out of Raikkonen’s lead again and they charged into the chicane side-by-side, Hamilton on the outside. Raikkonen, with Hamilton fully alongside him, pushed the McLaren clean off the track, putting Hamilton in the lead. Hamilton dropped back and let Raikkonen re-pass him, as per the rules, but caught Raikkonen’s slipstream and passed him again at La Source.

It still wasn’t over. Halfway around lap 43 Hamilton had to dive off the track to avoid Nico Rosberg’s Williams, which was re-joining the circuit. Raikkonen charged between the pair of them and took the lead again – but only for a few metres, as he spun at the exit of Fagnes.

Raikkonen then lost it again at the exit of Blanchimont and swiped into the barriers. Race over, fourth consecutive win at Spa gone.

By now it was raining heavily but neither Hamilton nor Massa wanted to risk losing the lead by pitting for wet weather tyres. They crawled around the final tour, taking over two and a half minutes each.

Video of Hamilton and Raikkonen’s battle

Drama in the rain

Meanwhile seven drivers had switched to wet weather rubber. Nick Heidfeld, Timo Glock, Nico Rosberg, David Coulthard, Kazuki Nakajima and Jenson Button on lap 42, and Fernando Alonso on lap 43.

Heidfeld and Alonso cut through the dry-weather stragglers on the final lap to finish third and fourth, demoting Vettel (fifth), Kubica (sixth) and Bourdais (seventh). The latter had begun the final lap in third place. Alonso later said if he’d been switched to intermediate tyres one lap earlier he’d have won.

Glock took the final points-paying place but only until the stewards got their hands on him. He was relegated from eighth to ninth for having passed Webber under yellow flags. Appropriately, Webber was promoted to eighth in his place.

The other drama on the final lap was the sudden disappearance of Kovalainen, who came to a halt on the Kemmel straight having been seventh.

Video of the last laps at Spa

More about Timo Glock’s penalty

Controversy after the flag

Sadly the drama was not to end at the chequered flag. The stewards determined after the race that Hamilton had gained an advantage by cutting the chicane while racing Raikkonen, and added 25 seconds to his race time, leaving him third behind Massa and Heidfeld.

Glock received the same penalty for passing Webber under yellow flags and was dropped from eighth to ninth behind the Red Bull driver.

The stationary Kovalainen was classified tenth ahead of Coulthard, Rosberg and Adrian Sutil, who moved ahead of Nakajima and Button when the rain fell, Trulli was 16th ahead of compatriot Fisichella, and the crashed-but-classified Raikkonen.

The only non-finishers were Rubens Barrichello, who load sixth gear, and Nelson Piquet Jnr. Piquet repeated the mistake he made in practice of touching a wet kerb, and spun off.

More about Lewis Hamilton’s penalty

The comments below have been split across multiple pages. If you are having trouble viewing all the comments click here to see them all.

Advert | Go Ad-free

90 comments on Hamilton is moral victor in Spa thriller

  1. darcy said on 8th September 2008, 3:44

    I agree with Polak (about Kubica indeed)
    Just watch YouTube video over and over and you see…
    Lewis will be champion, sooner or later, but he deserved this penalty.

  2. They will argue the facts at the appeal, not dessert, one imagines. The entire argument that Hamilton gained an advantage rests on the idea that he would not have been on Raikonnens’ tail going into La Source but for cutting the chicane. Given that he was abreast of Raikkonen seconds before and was in fact ejected from the track by him, this defies all logic. Furthermore, but for being run off the road, he would not have cut the chicane in the first place. The outcome desired by the stewards is that a driver gets to keep his pursuer behind him for not one but , at least two corners by running him off the track at a chicane.

  3. Rob R. said on 8th September 2008, 4:45

    Daniel, how many drivers in the history of F1 have driven spectacularly? Many. Did they all win their respective races in which they drove spectacularly? NO.

    If you want a sport where the winner is judged on how “spectacular” they are, go watch figure skating.

  4. teamorders said on 8th September 2008, 4:52

    dmw, of course Lewis gained an advantage by cutting the chicane. The alternative would have been to back right off (& probably brake) mid corner and then have to turn hard right to get back onto the track once Kimi had gone by, and then to turn left out of the chicane and accelerate.

    There is no way he’d be on Kimis gearbox if he did this.

    Therefore he gained an advantage by cutting the chicane, and that advantage take place though the corner and all the way down to the apex of la Source.

    Given he overtook Kimi before the apex of la Source then he deserved the penalty.

  5. will they be able to appeal?? it wont be justice if they cannot appeal.

  6. sultryBOB said on 8th September 2008, 6:13

    Why was he penalized for passing kimi when kimi crashed the person that he got a so could advantage on is out of the race. and the way massa has been in the rain i dont think he could have got past him.

  7. The only way this penalty makes sense would be if Kimi came home second. Then MAYBE the FIA could justify demoting Lewis to second and awarding the win to Kimi. Seeing as how Kimi so ineptly broke his car, why penalize the winner only to gift the win to Massa???

    It would be appreciated if the word “moral” never be used in any context with the Mosley led FIA, as the word has no applicability whatsoever.

  8. i am done with F1 its all run by the corporation with most money its not about the skill of the driver the FIA is all over McLaren and it dont matter how good Alonso is because he dont have the car so if all gos to plan the FIA and Ferrari have nothing to fear

  9. Before I say anything, I just want to say I am a Williams fan of over 20 years, so I don’t really care about the whole McLaren victim thing (Williams have been on the end of it with Farrari once or twice in their history as well)…
    However there are two points I want to make.

    One that nobody has picked up on. When Kimi was driving down to the first corner, with Lewis about to make his move does anyone else think he was weaving like hell?? Given the official FIA rule about moving once to block a car behind, it seems to me that Kimi was madly weaving more then once to block Lewis. hmm surely a 10 place penalty at the next race…

    Two, how lame does the non-decision last race concerning Ferrari and their release of Massa from the pit now look??

    I don’t favor McLaren in this at all, but I am getting a bit sick of this post race steward pro-Ferrari standard that has been in operation for what seems since 1996.

    Perhaps Bernie needs to extend the telecast for a further hour for the second half of the race, a live feed into the race stewards room to see who really wins every second Sunday..

  10. Gprad said on 8th September 2008, 7:19

    Hey guys, like a lot of people here I too am a Lewis & Mclaren Fan.

    But I think it is unfair to question the intentions of the FIA stewards. The facts are there for all of us to see. The decisions are based on interpretations of the rules and will vary from person to person.

    Lewis is still the best driver around. This incident is not going to change that fact anyway. He is still 2 points ahead of Massa and 19 points ahead of RAI. There are 5 races to go. Lewis can still win the WDC this year if he scores more points than them.

    Then why all this fuss?

  11. the fuss is because there is no consistency in the way f1 handles certain people and certain teams. everyone should be treated fairly and stealing people’s wins is making a fool of all us who watched. WE ARE NOT SO STUPID U KNOW. we can see when someone has been cheated from a hard earned win.

  12. Typical UK biased reporting.
    It is not disputed that Hamilton is talented. However, he is not infallible, saintly nor standing on any high moral ground. He tried for an advantage and lost out.
    If any of you couch potatoes had played any kind of real sport, you would understand that the umpire has the final say, regardless of whether or not you might agree with it. In this case it is the stewards making the adjudication.
    Would any of you more blinkered ones have anything to say if there had been an issue not involving Hamilton?

  13. KBS just read your comment out loud and listen to yourself. referees often get beat up for unfair rulings. this is not about hamilton because hamilton did what he had to do, its about fia biased rullings. dont miss the point.

  14. All the teams should boycott the Italian GP (for starters) if Lewis is not reinstated the Spa win. Massa and Ferrari should step up for once and refuse the win, but unfortunately they do not have the principals or the guts and they won’t.

    This stewards decision has been a damaging and disgusting farce and fiasco and has made a mockery of F1. I guess the stewards feel the Mosley affair wasn’t enough to spice things up and have resorted to blatant open cheating.

    (P.S – thanks for the accurate reporting of the facts as we all saw it happen on the TV Keith)

  15. diseased rat said on 8th September 2008, 9:12

    Ron Dennis had Charlie Whiting confirm to the team that he had followed the rules. The telemetry shows that Hamilton was running 6km/h slow than Raikkonen as they passed the start finish straight. Raikkonen’s slash from side to side from directly in front of Hamilton confirmed that Hamilton was behind him.

    So, Hamilton quite clearly followed the letter of the law. He may well have pushed the law a bit, I conceed, the spirit of the law may have been bent a little bit, but we’ve seen that countless times from Prost, Senna and particularly Schumacher. Usually without penalty like this.

    It’s a very poor decision because they are now going to have to reword the law and make it clear that you have to give the place back for at least 1 or 2 corners.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.