Kimi Raikkonen: the driver debates
25th September 2008, 12:00 by Keith Collantine 53 Comments »

Are Kimi Raikkonen's 2008 title chances over? He doesn't think so.
Kimi Raikkonen, the reigning world champion, is the final F1 racer to come under the scrutiny of our driver debates series and.
With four races left to run Raikkonen is in serious danger of losing his title: he could even fall out of championship contention in Singapore this weekend. What’s gone wrong for Ferrari’s number one in 2008?
Another Hakkinen?
In many ways the two Ferrari drivers have confounded the expectations of them this year: but while Felipe Massa has often exceeded them, Kimi Raikkonen hasn’t always lived up to them.
When was the last time we saw a reigning champion remain with the same outfit and same team mate, yet struggle to beat his team mate as often as Raikkonen has often done this year?
The Belgian Grand Prix showed us Raikkonen at his best. The conditions on the opening laps were made for him: where the McLaren has been the best car on a heavily wet track this year, the Ferrari has excelled in drying conditions. Raikkonen found more grip than Massa did; and unlike Lewis Hamilton he didn’t overstep the mark. He brushed Massa aside on the first lap, motored past a stationary Lewis Hamilton on the second tour, and led most of the afternoon.
But glimpses of such form from Raikkonen have been rare in the second half of 2008, although he started the season with wins in Sepang and Catalunya. It seems the opposite of what happened last year, when he enjoyed a clear up-swing in performance in the middle of the season.
Part of that is down to reliability problems: the broken exhaust in France, the engine failure in Valencia. But those are not the only reasons why he’s scored only 22 points in the last nine rounds.
It is often said of Raikkonen that he lacks the application in matters such as testing and post-race debriefs that his predecessor, Michael Schumacher, was legendary for. Raikkonen’s steely, quiet persona in front of the media probably exaggerates an impression that he does his best work in the cockpit and leaves the technical stuff for others to worry about. But there’s no doubt that, at present, the F2008 is presenting the Ferrari drivers with technical and driving challenges that Massa is doing a superior job of responding to at the moment.
In some ways Raikkonen reminds me of Mika Hakkinen, who could dominate races in the manner of Schumacher, but had other days when he just didn’t figure.
Starting with Sauber
Like Massa, Raikkonen got his F1 debut courtesy of Peter Sauber’s team (one year before Massa, in 2001). It’s amusing to look back at Autosports from seven and a half years ago and read stories of Max Mosley huffing and puffing about how this youngster, with a mere 23 race starts to his name, was not ready to race in F1 yet, and should spend his first few races on probation before getting a full super licence.
Raikkonen’s immediate ease at the wheel of an F1 car quickly eclipsed the presumptions of Mosley and many others in the F1 paddock. The following season Raikkonen was in a McLaren, leaving behind a very put-out former team mate Nick Heidfeld (who had previously enjoyed McLaren’s backing).
He was twice championship runner-up with McLaren in 2003 and 2005 (when his manager believes he should have picked up his first two world titles) and he was due a title when he bagged one for Ferrari last year. But this championship success has not, as many expected, ushered in an era of Raikkonen dominance.
Despite not carrying his late-2007 form throughout 2008, and despite Raikkonen seeming to care just as little for the celebrity of being an F1 driver as he always has, he and Ferrari have re-committed to each other until the end of 2010. Whatever Raikkonen’s problem is this year, it clearly isn’t a great concern to Ferrari. They could easily have signed another world champion – Fernando Alonso – in Raikkonen’s place.
Fastest laps
Another curiosity about Raikkonen, and one that has been mentioned on this site several times, is his propensity for racking up fastest laps. He’s set 34 of them in 134 starts, more than any other driver, bar Prost (41 from 199) and Schumacher (76 from 248). This year alone he’s scored nine fastest laps in 14 starts, many of them races where he otherwise didn’t figure.
What does this tell us about Raikkonen? That he’s a quick driver who’s had unreliable cars? That’s he prioritises race setup over qualifying pace? Or, as he once suggested, that he occasionally gets bored during races and entertains himself by nailing the fastest lap?
As mentioned earlier this week there is now a debate in the Ferrari camp about whether all its efforts for the end of this year should go to Massa, who is 20 points ahead of Raikkonen. Stefano Domenicali said:
The fight for the two titles will be very close. Kimi and Felipe met president [Luca] di Montezemolo who made it very clear that, as usual, Ferrari’s simple target come the end of the season is to win both titles. Both drivers will be working towards this target over the remaining four races, knowing that, as always for the Scuderia, the good of the team comes first.
Is this Ferrari’s way of saying Massa’s their man now? Raikkonen said: “Only when I no longer have a mathematical chance will I be totally at the service of the team.”
It would surely be madness for them to rule Raikkonen out of the championship now hunt after he came from such a long way back to win last year’s title.
Share your thoughts on Raikkonen’s qualities of a driver – and chance of retaining his title – below.
Read more about Kimi Raikkonen: Kimi Raikkonen biography
This concludes the driver debates series on active F1 drivers. The series will return during the off-season to look at some great drivers of past Formula 1 championships.




mani said on 25th September 2008, 12:48
I’m a big fan of Raikkonen. I would say his 2008 title hopes are put for a test now due to his
- Uncommon mistakes
- conventional bad luck
- Ferrari’s struggle with the wet weather races
- Lack of balance between qualifying and race setup
- Poor qualifying strategy
But, I don’t think that it is all over yet!!! There are four more races, I guess he’ll give some good try there! Title chances, he don’t have to think about it right now… if it has to happen he should do the best for the next four races and luck should favor him a little more than his efforts! It can hardly happen, but I’ll like him for his politeness and driving style forever!!!
Madurai said on 25th September 2008, 13:00
KIMI as the fastest laps suggests is clearly the fastest driver in the grid.The problem with him is just the technical input he gives back.I am sure he is not too techie just as SCHUMI.I work for the company which provide software solution to FERRARI F1 team and in one of our CEO’s interviews he said “SCHUMI is only driver who knows how the car feels just by hearing the sound of its engine…..AWESOME”.KIMI just lacks that.
Just a TRIVIA…..
Also in one of the interviews NICO ROSEBERG was asked who he feels is the fastest driver on grid.He answered without even hesitating a moment “Of course it is KIMI .HE IS REALLY FAST OUT THERE”.
This question was asked during the time when a 7 times CHAMP and 2TIMES CHAMP were Still driving.
Given a fast car which is designed to KIMI’s style I am sure he would have won more than others and be a WORLD CHAMP now..
Dorian said on 25th September 2008, 13:06
I am also a huge fan of Raikkonen, and like Mani, believe that his chances of winning the championship are very slim (though still possible) for the same reasons that Mani provided.
I’m also of the firm belief that, ceteris paribus, Raikkonen is the fastest F1 driver around. Not as ‘complete’ as Alonso, not as good an overtaker as Hamilton, but certainly the quickest round the track!
I also love the fact that he doesn’t pander to the media. Much like Webber who is known for saying what he likes (which I admire), Raikkonen doesn’t talk if he doesn’t want to (which I equally admire).
Terry Fabulous said on 25th September 2008, 14:12
Most overrated driver on the grid.
Very good but certainly not the second coming of Villeneuve.
Terry Fabulous said on 25th September 2008, 14:16
I should really qualify that!
* He was slower then Heidfeld in his first year.
* He spent his McLaren years breaking his cars and beating DC (massive acheivement).
* As a Ferrari driver he shares honours with Massa.
* He scores far too many wins by tooling around for a stint and passing people in the pits.
He is a heck of a fast driver, but there is this odd cult among F1 fans that he is awesome. He’s not. Some people love his attitude to the media and no nonesense personality. Yeah, this is like the silly girls at High School that fawn over silent brooding boys before finding out that in reality they are dull and boring.
Jolene said on 25th September 2008, 14:44
Keith, it would be interesting to know exactly which part of the race he sets these fastest laps. Perhaps towards the end when most drivers go into preservation mode? Kimi is quick but overrated in my opinion. And he reminds me of Hakkinen too : you cant believe the hype!
Antifia said on 25th September 2008, 14:48
He started at Sauber and for once I agree with Max’s position on the matter – a driver so inexperienced as he was ought to have been scrutinized in his first few GPs. It turned out that he was alright but it could have been otherwise.
Despite the fact that he was ok for F1, I believe Kimi has been grossly overated throughout his career. In his first year he lost to Heidfeld and yet he got the gig at Mclaren that somewhat staled Heidfeld’s career (a bit of an injustice). At Mclaren he managed to beat his teamates but they were hardly first rate drivers anyway (Coultard, De La Rosa and a demotivated Montoya). This story that he should have won the 2003 and 2005 championships can only be described as a self serving delusion from his manager. If the FIA had not helped Der-Meister-Cheat by banning the Michelin tyres, Montoya would have won the 2003 title – not Kimi. In 2005 he had a run against Alonso and lost – fair and square. The fastest lap thing is a ludicrous ploy. Something to save face. You are the fastest man, you win the race. Most of the fastest laps are set in the end of the races, when fuel is low and tyres have become semi-slicks. While the race leader is saving his car, a lackluster Kimi goes and sets the fastest lap because there is nothing to be lost. In fact, he did it a couple of times in 2006, just to have an engine failure (and subsequent 10 position demotion in the grid) in the run up to the next grand prix. I bit dim witted, isn’t it?… Which brings me to his coolness..He does not speak much because he is not able to – not in English at least. He is not the first F1 Finn lost for words: Hakinen couldn’t (as in was-not-able-to) speak much either. And Kimi became champion on account of being incredibly lucky – he did not so much won the championship as Lewis found a way to lose it.
He is not a bad driver, but come on, he is not great. I root for Massa, but I am well aware of his (Massa’s) shortcomings. In the last two years kimi and Massa have been pretty much level at Ferrari – a trully great driver would have blown Massa out of the water.
(in time: Hamilton is not a great either, having a better car in terms of reliability, pace and wet whether grip, he is just 1 point ahead of Massa after 14 races. I am no fan of Schumacher, but he would probably have won the championship by now if he were in Felipe’s (or Kimi’s) place)
CD said on 25th September 2008, 14:49
Jolene:
He has the fastest lap in the whole race amongst the drivers. not only a part of it.
CD said on 25th September 2008, 14:56
I totally agree Antifia. Still schumi is the most complete driver. or should I say team?
Jolene said on 25th September 2008, 14:59
CD: I know what the fastest lap means. My question is at which point in the race it was set. The middle stint or last stint? Or am I now really a smurfette today?
Jolene said on 25th September 2008, 15:05
Antifia, I couldnt have said it better myself. And you answered my question about the fastest lap. Agree with you on each count except the part about Schumi.
DG said on 25th September 2008, 15:16
He must have been a good boy recently to get the contract to the end of 2010. So what was all the rubbish that he was saying earlier this year, hinting that he might be moving onto something new and more interesting? Has he been seeing other teams in secret, and been given the cold shoulder? Perhaps hes not determined enough to appeal to say DTM or NASCAR teams?
So, his reward for keeping quiet and letting Massa win the Championship this year is an extended contract…..
How will he be feeling this time next year?
Becken said on 25th September 2008, 15:34
Keith,
Congratulations, for this wonderful series. I must to say that the amount of material, fresh ideas and insights that came up from those debates were worth read and a great source of study. Some of my posts about drivers in my BLOG are very influenced by this great stuff provided by you and the commenters. Thank you, Keith, thank you, guys
Keith Collantine said on 25th September 2008, 15:34
DG – Raikkonen says he never said anything like that:
DG said on 25th September 2008, 15:38
Thanks keith – any chance of looking back and seeing what he actually said?
If it was badly reported then fair’s fair, but if he was deliberately misleading (as I can recall), then its either a strange PR coup or a garbled Finn…