Coulthard hits back at Kravitz

First Luca di Montezemolo vs Bernie Ecclestone, now it?s Ted Kravitz (ITV?s pit lane reporter) vs David Coulthard.

Kravitz had a few sharp words to say about Coulthard?s performance in the Singapore Grand Prix:

It seems pointless to criticise a man who?s only got three more races to go in his F1 career, but since he may well be dishing plenty of criticism out to others next year, I?ll start now: he was mediocre in Singapore.

David was handed a gilt-edged opportunity by his team, who made the right call when Piquet crashed. [??] When the safety car came in, he was looking good – running right behind Alonso and Webber, yet he finished the race behind Rosberg (with a 10 second stop & go), Hamilton, Glock, Vettel and Heidfeld.

David will argue that he lost time on his in-lap due to Alonso coming out of the pits and blocking him on lap 42. But he lost four seconds. A good in-lap was 1m50s, a decent one 1m52s, David?s was 1m56s. Could he not have overtaken the Renault?

And he?ll point to the three or four seconds lost in the pit stop (through no fault of his own), but David finished 16 seconds behind and could only manage the 13th quickest lap.

I don?t mean to sound picky, but it just seems that David is a shadow of the driver he was this time last year.

Coulthard?s response came a few days later and, to be fair, it was not entirely surprising given Kravitz?s column ended ??Luckily, [Coulthard]?s a fellow columnist on this website, so check back in a few days and you might find out!??

But the length of Coulthard?s response ?ǣ over 1,100 words! – and the cutting nature of some of his remarks suggest Kravitz may have touched a nerve. Here?s a snippet of Coulthard?s indignant reaction:

However my fellow columnist Ted Kravitz ?ǣ who I think I may have met in the Formula 1 paddock at some point, although I?d have to check ?ǣ has thrown down the gauntlet by suggesting that my performance was ??mediocre?? and that I?m now in retirement mode.

Having now had the opportunity to read Ted?s column, I?m afraid there are several inaccuracies that I need to correct to give a true picture of how my race unfolded.

First off, he criticises my slow in-lap before my second pit stop and asks why I was unable to overtake Fernando Alonso, who had just emerged from the pits.

Well, Lewis Hamilton ?ǣ in one of the fastest cars out there ?ǣ couldn?t pass me for more than 20 laps, so why would I be able to pass Alonso, who went on to win the grand prix?

If Lewis is as good as we all think he is, why did he spend more than 20 laps behind me?

Could he not have overtaken a driver in the twilight of his career if it was as easy as Ted imagines? How many people have you, Ted Kravitz, overtaken?


I?m entirely comfortable being in the category of has-been because the other options are to be a wannabe or a never-has-been.

Read Coulthard?s full reaction here, and share your thoughts below on whether this is a proper row or just ITV trying to whip up some interest in their columns.

Coulthard, of course, is tipped to be part of BBC’s F1 coverage in 2009, but Kravitz is not…

Advert | Go Ad-free


27 comments on Coulthard hits back at Kravitz

  1. i think it may well be just ITV trying to stir up some publicity

    btw Keith are you planning on doing anything on ITVs 10 year coverage or wateva it is, seeing as they only have 3 raes left to cover!

  2. Scott Joslin said on 7th October 2008, 19:13

    Fair play to David for sticking up for himself – even if it does get a bit bitchy at times!

  3. Robert McKay said on 7th October 2008, 19:18

    Whatever the reasons, though, DC – you got a huge break with the safety car and failed to turn it into the potential big result it was. I think Kravitz has a point that it’s just as well DC’s driving career is winding down. Not necessarily through lack of trying, but he’s been woeful this year.

  4. Down girls, handbags at dawn.

  5. Keith,

    Off topic, but what do you understood about this:

    It was further unanimously agreed to allow Formula One teams to equalise engine performance across the field for 2009, pending the introduction of cost-saving measures from 2010…

    “Equalise engine performance” means that the teams will be free to develop their engine power through the year or that they will equalize all teams engine power (something impossible, I guess)?

    This statement is very dubious…

  6. Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th October 2008, 20:15

    Becken – I’m thinking through that at the moment actually, working on a piece on it for tomorrow…

  7. Keith,

    Ok! My guess is that this FIA´s decision has a huge impact on Alonso´s choices. He was just waiting this meeting to announce that he will stay at Renault. I think he will announce that son, maybe in Fuji!

  8. bernification said on 7th October 2008, 21:43

    I’m a bit confused about the closing statement attributed to David there- Has-been is better than wannabe or never-has-been.

    Now, at the risk of getting a similar verbal assault from DC fans as he gave to TK, you never really set the world on fire there did you David?
    At one point DC looked like he might have a championship in him, but it just kind of evaporated. I know people will try to say he was racing against RD’s favourite at the time (of his best opportunity), but he just isn’t a has-been champion. And his performances have definately tailed off, which given his car wrestling performances of the last few seasons, is quite a feat.

    I think Lewis probably didn’t want to commit to a move as David doesn’t seem to see anything until it’s too late!

    Hope he’s a good commentator nevertheless.

  9. John H said on 7th October 2008, 22:30

    I have to say I dislike DC when he does this. A small put down (Bernie Clown-Style) would have sufficed, not this bitter rant. Kravitz’s comments deserved a come-back fo sure, but it should be done on the track in his remaining races.

  10. pSynrg said on 7th October 2008, 23:41

    Come on, that’s just classic Coulthard. Many of us will miss him when he’s gone :)
    I agree he’s had a “mildly successful career”.
    Opportunities more lost than won? I remember seeing him in FF1600 & F3 back in the day and he was awesome.Which never seemed to translate cleanly into F1.

    Although Coulthard appears forever stifled by formality he nonetheless remains as one of F1’s more colourful characters.
    I sincerely hope he has a go at commentating!

  11. michael counsell said on 8th October 2008, 0:16

    Coulthard actually did well be this years standards by not crashing into Hamilton. Massa, Button, Glock, Vettel, Nakajima (maybe more) weren’t so lucky…

    Does he hold the record for most collisions with another car in Formula One history?

  12. Loki said on 8th October 2008, 0:59

    If Lewis is as good as we all think he is

    Inadvertent jib at Lewis?

    in my opinion mildly successful career

    Scottish sarcasm :D

    Many people don’t like this side of Coulthard, but I think it’s about the only redeeming thing about him – he speaks his mind. I never did like him much as a driver, always thought there would be someone much hungrier begging for the spot he’s in. But he’s certainly a good laugh – and it doesn’t even matter if I agree with him or not.

    He does have a good point though, it’s very easy for someone to say something, or for all of us to argue about something when we’ve not come close to what the driver experiences and goes through in that situation.

    Look at the number of times we’ve all been up in arms – Lewis Hamilton at Spa for instance – easy to say what he did was right/wrong or say he’s immature and could’ve waited another corner (yes, I said this as well)….but none of us are really qualified in our arguments given if we were in that car we’d probably end up as cabbages.

  13. Journeyer said on 8th October 2008, 1:42

    Many people don’t like this side of Coulthard, but I think it’s about the only redeeming thing about him – he speaks his mind.

    Actually, all this ‘speaking his mind’ business only happened after he left McLaren, which was in the later part of his career. Before then, we usually criticized him for doing PR talk. Sure, he had his moments like France 2000, but otherwise, this vocal version of DC came very late in his career.

  14. From the other point of view, just what is Ted’s background? Has he ever been in a racing car? He knows lots of facts and figures, but comes across as a real nerd on race days. As opposed to Keith who is always balanced and user-friendly!
    ITV have Ted fronting the BTCC show as well, and he looks so uncomfortable talking to the drivers!

  15. schumi the greatest said on 8th October 2008, 8:42

    I kno its everyone’s entitled to their opinions but it was abit of a stinging attack on dc.

    I agree with a few other people in this thread, it did look like he could challenge for a championship, but dc missed a couple of vital things that seperate championship winners and multiple winners. he never had alot of pace in qualifying, the ability to, pull out a really quick time when his car wasnt up to it and he just wasnt aggressive enough bar the odd exception (france 2000)

    still though a good career

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.