Comments on: Hamilton and Raikkonen’s Fuji clash – the penalty they got wrong (Video)

By: Teva

Teva — Sun, 24 May 2009 06:07:59 +0000

Hello everyone. Very nice site. I must say that I am impressed. Keep up the good work. Help me! I can not find sites on the: Turbo Tax. I found only this – turbo tax. Do synthroid help you lose weight while maintaining and treating hypothyroidism? Entry filed under – synthroid and calcium. Thank you very much . Teva from Bosnia.

By: motion

motion — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:02:09 +0000

Dcal, no a slightly disappointed RBR/Webber fan (not bold or good enough recently – I hate watching 1 stoppers who can’t race from P6 down).

Otherwise it is pure business in my views of Ferrari/McLaren/Alonso. Hamilton is fast but ratty and his being a choker is on record and he should only be given 1 more year. Dennis lost the plot last year as a team manager and will never recover.

Alonso and Kubica are the two top performing drivers this year by far and I think McLaren should give de la Rosa a steep pay rise for holding the development side up after Alonso’s departure.

By: amer

amer — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:52:34 +0000

raikkonen got a drive through penalty in melbourne for forcing schumacher go off track on turn 1 once

By: Keith Collantine

Keith Collantine — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:11:29 +0000

New video evidence here: F1.com reacts to criticism of Fuji penalties by releasing new videos

By: Dcal

Dcal — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:38:34 +0000

Motion….let me guess, Ferrari fan?

By: motion

motion — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:30:40 +0000

Without Hamilton, and with Alonso, McLaren and Mercedes would have had consecutive world championships last year and this. Mercedes’ board should be pushing for them to dump Dennis this year and Hamilton the next if he keeps his record of screwing up when the chips are down. That would mean luring Alonso back for 2010.

By: CD

CD — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:44:14 +0000

@Jolene
…and for those who do not like FIA/Stewards decisions, stop watching F1.

By: Gusto

Gusto — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:53:49 +0000

Oh, I nearly forgot, You know, Massa `leaving the track and gaining an advantage`, Webber shuts the inside door as to make Massa take the outside line and all that slow in fast out *********, No I`ll drive straight through the Pit Hatchings and frighten the life out of Him`… quality….. but as Martin implied “That could of ended with a very big accident”……..but if there`s a gap, I`am your chap…. thats what the new punters want, thats what the new punters will get.

By: Gusto

Gusto — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:48:54 +0000

(Steam coming out of ears down to a trickle) Are there m/any examples of a driver being penalized for losing it under braking into the first corner of a race?. and considering it was Kova that done the dirty deed, makes it all the more bizarre (well not to me!). I think Massa was just praying that the move would stick, he had more to lose ie suspension failure, lost nose cone, puncture etc.. than Lewis ,the fact that Lewis spun and he`s own car was ok is a bonus, then a racers natural arrogance will kick in and say “nothing wrong with that”. The day you stop going for the gap, is the day you stop being a racing driver and become a `also ran`. But as they were gonna nail Lewis they had to nail Massa as well or they would`ve `let the cat out of the bag`. And then they do the Boudais decision.???????..You couldn`t make this stuff up!

By: Oliver

Oliver — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:17:29 +0000

@Number 38
I have seen replays of the incident between Massa and Hamilton, even without the benefit of those replays, I am certain Massa was in the wrong.

He had run very wide, so wide that he was, perpendicular to the next corner he was going to negotiate. Also, he had lost momentum and was already fully behind the Mclaren. Hamilton took the proper line through the corner, yes he still gave Massa almost a cars width at the following corner.

If you claim you watched the replay, you hould have seen that he did not make any attempt to climb the kerb. The car following behind them, Kimi’s, took the corner the same way Hamilton did, so how did you arrive at your conclusion?