It’s that time of year when we look ahead to the final round try to figure out who needs to finish where to win which championship.
Long-time readers of this site know I don’t think very much of points systems and think they should be scrapped.
Bernie Ecclestone thinks so too, and when you look at how close this year’s championship would be if we did I think it’s hard not to agree.
Here’s the championship situation as it currently stands:
Lewis Hamilton 94
Felipe Massa 87
Explaining all the permutations by which the drivers’ title might be resolved next week is rather complicated. And if you want a real headache, try doing the same for the constructors’ championship. And when there’s more than two drivers or teams involved it gets quite painful.
Bernie Ecclestone recently repeated as suggestion of his (which he first brought up years ago) that the F1 championships should do away with points and mimic the Olympics’ medals leaderboard instead. So the drivers’ championship would instead look like this:
Now that would make things a lot more straightforward: whichever driver wins the final race wins the title. Were Massa to finish third with Hamilton outside the top three, then fourth places could be used to determine the champion, then fifths and so on.
This isn’t as radical a proposal as you might think. In fact this exact system would be used to determine the champion were the two to end the year tied on points. So why not just dump points to begin with and make the whole thing easier?
One of the usual responses to this suggestion is that prioritising wins in this way would do too little to reward consistency.
But do we really want to reward consistency as much as we do now? I found watching Lewis Hamilton site behind David Coulthard for lap after lap at Singapore because he didn’t want to risk a safe six points rather tedious. In my scenario he’d have been 4-5 down to Massa on wins and I bet he’d have been pushing rather harder to pass Coulthard.
We need to give drivers the maximum incentive to push for wins. Simply boosting the winners’ points haul to 12 or more isn’t enough. Racing to win is the essence of F1 and the championship structure should reflected that.
That’s my opinion anyway, and I’ll continue to hold it until someone convinces me otherwise. Over to you…
Here are some earlier articles where I’ve made the same argument, with examples from past F1 seasons and other championships:
- A new answer to the points argument
- Prizes for places, not points
- Places not points revisited
- The argument against championship points
- Hamilton leads title race – with no wins!
- The leaders are losers
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others