<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jimmie Johnson is NASCAR&#8217;s #1 again &#8211; but how would he fare in Formula 1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ufc fighting</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-2/#comment-374938</link>
		<dc:creator>ufc fighting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 19:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-374938</guid>
		<description>UFC 114 will have a whole lot of matches, but none at the magnitude of the bout between Quinton Jackson and Rashad Evans. This is 1 of the most anticipated match-ups, which will finally acquire location this month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UFC 114 will have a whole lot of matches, but none at the magnitude of the bout between Quinton Jackson and Rashad Evans. This is 1 of the most anticipated match-ups, which will finally acquire location this month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pitt layne</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-2/#comment-299007</link>
		<dc:creator>pitt layne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-299007</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know why we haven&#039;t had another Mario Andretti. He won in F1, IndyCar, and NASCAR. What&#039;s the big deal? Driving is driving. You have gas, brake, and steering. We do it all the time. We turn left and right in the city streets. Road racing. On the highways we change lanes. Ovals. Why can&#039;t a racing athlete do the same and win in both disciplines? Mansell was the only one to do a F1 championship and IndyCar championship simultaneously. He did win a few oval races along the way. Incidentally, Michael Andretti went to F1 that same year and didn&#039;t do squat. He did get a third place at a track that used to be an oval. Monza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why we haven&#8217;t had another Mario Andretti. He won in F1, IndyCar, and NASCAR. What&#8217;s the big deal? Driving is driving. You have gas, brake, and steering. We do it all the time. We turn left and right in the city streets. Road racing. On the highways we change lanes. Ovals. Why can&#8217;t a racing athlete do the same and win in both disciplines? Mansell was the only one to do a F1 championship and IndyCar championship simultaneously. He did win a few oval races along the way. Incidentally, Michael Andretti went to F1 that same year and didn&#8217;t do squat. He did get a third place at a track that used to be an oval. Monza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PipSTA</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-2/#comment-230262</link>
		<dc:creator>PipSTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-230262</guid>
		<description>For the whole, race them against one another, I had an idea about this wayyyyyy before I saw this, honest.

The idea would be to take 14 drivers, from the following: Formula 1 World Champion, Monaco Grand Prix Winner, IndyCar series Champion, Indy 500 Champion, NASCAR Sprint Cup Champion, Daytona 500 Champion, World Touring Car Champion, Bathurst 1000 Winner, FIA GT GT1 Champion, LeMans Overall Winner, World Rally Champion, Monte Carlo Rally Winner, Moto GP Champion, Isle of Man Senior TT Winner.

In places where these would be the same person, then go to second in the championship or whatever. And have one representative from the endurance winners. And also take along their teammates.

Then race tham over a few races, with a varity of machines like each of those, and see who comes out on top. Would be a lot of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the whole, race them against one another, I had an idea about this wayyyyyy before I saw this, honest.</p>
<p>The idea would be to take 14 drivers, from the following: Formula 1 World Champion, Monaco Grand Prix Winner, IndyCar series Champion, Indy 500 Champion, NASCAR Sprint Cup Champion, Daytona 500 Champion, World Touring Car Champion, Bathurst 1000 Winner, FIA GT GT1 Champion, LeMans Overall Winner, World Rally Champion, Monte Carlo Rally Winner, Moto GP Champion, Isle of Man Senior TT Winner.</p>
<p>In places where these would be the same person, then go to second in the championship or whatever. And have one representative from the endurance winners. And also take along their teammates.</p>
<p>Then race tham over a few races, with a varity of machines like each of those, and see who comes out on top. Would be a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paige</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226521</link>
		<dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226521</guid>
		<description>Johnson would hack up Formula One. He is a very good oval racer, but his team- and in particular, his brilliant crew chief, Chad Knaus- account for a large portion of his success. Johnson&#039;s record on road courses leaves a lot to be desired, and he&#039;s never won a road course race. 

The only NASCAR driver (excluding Montoya) who would be a top Formula One driver is Jeff Gordon. He&#039;s one of the most naturally gifted drivers who has ever raced. He holds the NASCAR record for wins on road courses (9), and his technique on them is superb. The only bad race he has ever had on a road course is this past year at Watkins Glen, but his car in that race was inexplicably horrible. He&#039;s defeated Sebastien Bourdais and Nelson Piquet, Jr. in straight up matches at the Race of Champions. It&#039;s a shame he never took the opportunity to jump to Formula One, as he was offered a shot by BAR back in the late-90s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnson would hack up Formula One. He is a very good oval racer, but his team- and in particular, his brilliant crew chief, Chad Knaus- account for a large portion of his success. Johnson&#8217;s record on road courses leaves a lot to be desired, and he&#8217;s never won a road course race. </p>
<p>The only NASCAR driver (excluding Montoya) who would be a top Formula One driver is Jeff Gordon. He&#8217;s one of the most naturally gifted drivers who has ever raced. He holds the NASCAR record for wins on road courses (9), and his technique on them is superb. The only bad race he has ever had on a road course is this past year at Watkins Glen, but his car in that race was inexplicably horrible. He&#8217;s defeated Sebastien Bourdais and Nelson Piquet, Jr. in straight up matches at the Race of Champions. It&#8217;s a shame he never took the opportunity to jump to Formula One, as he was offered a shot by BAR back in the late-90s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chalky</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226427</link>
		<dc:creator>Chalky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226427</guid>
		<description>You can get a good driver at both, but to excel and be the champion takes that little bit extra.

Having not watched a NASCAR race on TV for donkeys years, I was wondering what sort of braking force the drivers go through. Mainly oval racing tends to a sort of endurance aspect or racing. However F1 is very much G force orientated, especially in the braking areas.

I would think that this would be the hardest thing for a NASCAR driver to adapt to.
F1 to NASCAR would be the reliance on mechanical grip over aero. Having a good feel for the car would be an advantage, but good team work \ setup knowledge seems to be a big plus in NASCAR.

Rather than NASCAR, maybe we should be wondering how would some of our current F1 drivers fare at the Indy 500, if they were still allowed to compete in it?
Maybe bring it back as a round of the F1 championship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get a good driver at both, but to excel and be the champion takes that little bit extra.</p>
<p>Having not watched a NASCAR race on TV for donkeys years, I was wondering what sort of braking force the drivers go through. Mainly oval racing tends to a sort of endurance aspect or racing. However F1 is very much G force orientated, especially in the braking areas.</p>
<p>I would think that this would be the hardest thing for a NASCAR driver to adapt to.<br />
F1 to NASCAR would be the reliance on mechanical grip over aero. Having a good feel for the car would be an advantage, but good team work \ setup knowledge seems to be a big plus in NASCAR.</p>
<p>Rather than NASCAR, maybe we should be wondering how would some of our current F1 drivers fare at the Indy 500, if they were still allowed to compete in it?<br />
Maybe bring it back as a round of the F1 championship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeK</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226316</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226316</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t American racers gravitate to F1? Besides the required indenturement to European feeder series? In the last three years JJ has won the championships, his race winnings are in excess of 38 million bucks. That&#039;s not including salary and marketing income.

Sure Kimi might make 33 mil a season, but there are only a handful of drivers in that salary range, whereas in NASCAR million dollar paydays are more common. Or at least they were before the depression hit.

Which is why Jeff Gordon could not have cut the cord and raced in F1, he wouldn&#039;t tolerate the pay cut.

As far as skills go, I think it would take at least two full seasons of racing and testing to see if JJ or JG could race in F1. My guess would be no, the cars are so different, and the pressure so much more intense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t American racers gravitate to F1? Besides the required indenturement to European feeder series? In the last three years JJ has won the championships, his race winnings are in excess of 38 million bucks. That&#8217;s not including salary and marketing income.</p>
<p>Sure Kimi might make 33 mil a season, but there are only a handful of drivers in that salary range, whereas in NASCAR million dollar paydays are more common. Or at least they were before the depression hit.</p>
<p>Which is why Jeff Gordon could not have cut the cord and raced in F1, he wouldn&#8217;t tolerate the pay cut.</p>
<p>As far as skills go, I think it would take at least two full seasons of racing and testing to see if JJ or JG could race in F1. My guess would be no, the cars are so different, and the pressure so much more intense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226306</guid>
		<description>Being that I started watching NASCAR first, I tend to favor it well over F1. To the comment of fake racing, I could get in to this one about what makes NASCAR good but what is the point. I know what I like and will not waste time trying to convince others. NASCAR and F1 are the two bigest in motosports and in there own right have the best drivers for the disipline. Johnson is in a great driver in a great car and a great crew. Yes the new chase system has played in to his favor, but this championship was not won by a landslide and would have been a lot closer had luck not went there way and bad luck for other drivers. But that is part of racing. I think Johnson would fare in F1 about as well as if you put Hamilton straght in to a Cup car with just a few races in the lower brackes as Johnson would if he did a race or two in GP2 and then went to F1. They would suck. You just cant go from one disipline to another. Most open wheel drivers have a hard time in Cup cars caues they are jumping straght in them and that is one hell of a learning curve. Plus truth betold the O/W in Cup are driving for Mid to Backmarkers. Even  if you put Johnson a top team he is not conditioned for it. Just like Hamilton is not conditioned for NASCAR. Johnson would fare well in Melborne due to the close quarters and the fact that any hit at all and it is over. Also he is used to have 4 hours and a dozen pit stops to fix his car and has a great realtionship with his crew cheif. Hamilton put in to a Hendrick car would be ok, top team and no experince. No technology to tell him what is wrong with the car, for that matter there is no speedomitor, So he would have to learn to feel the car more. Get in good with the crew and learn how to drive closed cockpit and for 4hours in many differnt types of tracks from .5 yo 2.5 miles. He would also have to learn to deal with getting hit. Also from what I have seen they would have to deal with the big culture shock of the new racing world they are entering. So how would he far. In truth the only way to know is he would have to go through the lower ranks to get to F1 and then we would see the true answer. But that is not going to happen, The same for if Hamilton came to NASCAR, again not going to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being that I started watching NASCAR first, I tend to favor it well over F1. To the comment of fake racing, I could get in to this one about what makes NASCAR good but what is the point. I know what I like and will not waste time trying to convince others. NASCAR and F1 are the two bigest in motosports and in there own right have the best drivers for the disipline. Johnson is in a great driver in a great car and a great crew. Yes the new chase system has played in to his favor, but this championship was not won by a landslide and would have been a lot closer had luck not went there way and bad luck for other drivers. But that is part of racing. I think Johnson would fare in F1 about as well as if you put Hamilton straght in to a Cup car with just a few races in the lower brackes as Johnson would if he did a race or two in GP2 and then went to F1. They would suck. You just cant go from one disipline to another. Most open wheel drivers have a hard time in Cup cars caues they are jumping straght in them and that is one hell of a learning curve. Plus truth betold the O/W in Cup are driving for Mid to Backmarkers. Even  if you put Johnson a top team he is not conditioned for it. Just like Hamilton is not conditioned for NASCAR. Johnson would fare well in Melborne due to the close quarters and the fact that any hit at all and it is over. Also he is used to have 4 hours and a dozen pit stops to fix his car and has a great realtionship with his crew cheif. Hamilton put in to a Hendrick car would be ok, top team and no experince. No technology to tell him what is wrong with the car, for that matter there is no speedomitor, So he would have to learn to feel the car more. Get in good with the crew and learn how to drive closed cockpit and for 4hours in many differnt types of tracks from .5 yo 2.5 miles. He would also have to learn to deal with getting hit. Also from what I have seen they would have to deal with the big culture shock of the new racing world they are entering. So how would he far. In truth the only way to know is he would have to go through the lower ranks to get to F1 and then we would see the true answer. But that is not going to happen, The same for if Hamilton came to NASCAR, again not going to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226283</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226283</guid>
		<description>Being a F1 fan in a small town in the US, I feel like I am alone on an island.  Never had much use or interest in NASCAR but to think Johnson could come over and compete in F1 would be next to impossible.  Comparing NASCAR to F1 is like comparing professional &quot;wrestling&quot; to UFC.  Totally different discipline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a F1 fan in a small town in the US, I feel like I am alone on an island.  Never had much use or interest in NASCAR but to think Johnson could come over and compete in F1 would be next to impossible.  Comparing NASCAR to F1 is like comparing professional &#8220;wrestling&#8221; to UFC.  Totally different discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226254</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226254</guid>
		<description>As for Jimmie Johnson doing well in F1, I think that it would take a long time for him to adapt enough to be any good. Look at how other Americans have done - Scott Speed and Sebastien Bourdais most recently. Montoya didn&#039;t get on that well, and even Villeneuve had problems. I know they hadn&#039;t come from NASCAR, but IRL seems to run on similar tracks, and the drivers need a different mind-set to the F1 guys.
Maybe if F1 does ever get back into North America, it could look at running an oval race, to really challenge the drivers and the engineers to get the right set up, and maybe get more American interest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Jimmie Johnson doing well in F1, I think that it would take a long time for him to adapt enough to be any good. Look at how other Americans have done &#8211; Scott Speed and Sebastien Bourdais most recently. Montoya didn&#8217;t get on that well, and even Villeneuve had problems. I know they hadn&#8217;t come from NASCAR, but IRL seems to run on similar tracks, and the drivers need a different mind-set to the F1 guys.<br />
Maybe if F1 does ever get back into North America, it could look at running an oval race, to really challenge the drivers and the engineers to get the right set up, and maybe get more American interest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/11/23/jimmie-johnson-is-nascars-1-again-but-how-would-he-fare-in-formula-1/comment-page-1/#comment-226253</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=12883#comment-226253</guid>
		<description>Hounslow, great idea, but to be fair I think you would also have to include DTM and WTCC drivers too, and what about the Japanese Touring Cars and Austrailian V8s come to that?
I know that the Race of Champions tries to include everybody, but it is really only half the picture. It would be cool to see maybe a short sprint GP2 race with all sorts of &#039;guest&#039; drivers competing on equal terms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hounslow, great idea, but to be fair I think you would also have to include DTM and WTCC drivers too, and what about the Japanese Touring Cars and Austrailian V8s come to that?<br />
I know that the Race of Champions tries to include everybody, but it is really only half the picture. It would be cool to see maybe a short sprint GP2 race with all sorts of &#8216;guest&#8217; drivers competing on equal terms</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/24 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 476/480 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 14:16:05 -->
