Two months ago Max Mosley rubbished FOTA?óÔéźÔäós suggestion that refuelling during F1 races could be banned.
Now a refuelling ban is on the cards for 2010. What has brought about the happy change of heart at the FIA?
As with tyre warmers I think banning refuelling will both improve the F1 spectacle and reduce costs.
Adds nothing to the spectacle
Since 1994 the FIA has clung to a notion that refuelling somehow adds to ‘the spectacle’ of F1. I don’t see how – in fact, I think it shows a complete failure to understand what is truly spectacular about motor racing. If you want to go to a race and see something stunning, watch the drivers brushing the barriers at Monaco, or twitching through Eau Rouge in the damp, or slipstreaming each other at 200mph. Watching a couple of guys pump petrol into a car isn’t spectacular. You don’t get crowds of people standing around filling stations.
I don’t want ‘interesting strategies’ I want pure, unadulterated, heart-pumping racing.
The FIA doesn’t seem to understand this. Back when it surveyed the fans on what they wanted from F1 in 2005 and 2006, it never even bothered to ask whether anyone liked refuelling. When FOTA first raised the possibility of banning refuelling Max Mosley said rather sniffily that he would not consider proposals that threatened to change ‘the show’.
Either he has been convinced that refuelling will not affect the show, or it will improve it, or FOTA have got the better of him politically.
A worthless cost
I expect the decision to drop refuelling isn’t about spectacle, it’s about cutting costs. At present each team has two refuelling rigs, meaning a total of at least twenty that have to be flown and driven around the world. They only make races interesting when they fail (and they do that too often – remember all the fires at Hungary this year?) so they are not worth having around.
More good news: at a stroke it would make qualifying better by removing the confusing, excitement-sapping ‘race fuel’ element. And it would largely solve the problem of drivers having to pit for fuel during pit lane closures and getting penalties.
The FIA has also said it will conduct research into whether F1 races should be shorter. There is no reason why Grands Prix would need to be shorter if refuelling were banned – race were not made longer when refuelling was introduced in 1994. The teams would simply have to use larger fuel tanks in 2010, and there’s plenty of time for them to factor that into their designs.
Getting rid of refuelling would be worth doing even if it cost money. As it is, this is a win-win scenario for F1, and I looked forward to refuelling-free racing in 2010.
- FOTA discusses F1 refuelling ban
- Bad safety car rules catch out Heidfeld
- Refuelling rig fires and failures hit race
- Two good reasons to ban refuelling
- A brief history of pit stops in F1 (video)
- The FIA Survey: How to fix Formula One
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others