<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Would you get rid of Singapore&#8217;s bumps?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/</link> <description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: kyle</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-267188</link> <dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:34:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-267188</guid> <description>Singapore would be better as a day race because you would see the beauty of singapore.The whole track really needs to be changed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Singapore would be better as a day race because you would see the beauty of singapore.</p><p>The whole track really needs to be changed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: john brownlie</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-234735</link> <dc:creator>john brownlie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:12:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-234735</guid> <description>the only things they should change are pit entry and exit - leave the rest alone for another year!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only things they should change are pit entry and exit &#8211; leave the rest alone for another year!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kyle</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-234098</link> <dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-234098</guid> <description>Instead of going around the cricket field they should use the road that cuts between the current circuit. There would be no stupid chicane to worry about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of going around the cricket field they should use the road that cuts between the current circuit. There would be no stupid chicane to worry about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonathan</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231559</link> <dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:30:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231559</guid> <description>after watching the onboard footage numerous times ive come to the following conclusion.1. Move the Turn 1,2,3 grandstand a bit further and combine T1,2,3 into a Hairpain followed by a chicane.2. Keep the bumps. i like to see some sparks coming out of the back of the cars.3. Keep T10 the way it is. but removing those HUGEEE concrete blocks.4. Combine T22 and 23 into a slow 90 degrees left hander. (but im not sure this would work because there wouldnt be much run off areas left)ive put together a REALLY simple drawing of my modification (im not good with photoshop etc). Black lines represent the modification and the purple line represents the pit lane entry.Drawing:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://i41.tinypic.com/2zjjq14.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://i41.tinypic.com/2zjjq14.jpg&lt;/a&gt;There really isnt much you can do about the track because of the layout of the streets. With my modification T1 would be the only overtaking point of the track.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after watching the onboard footage numerous times ive come to the following conclusion.</p><p>1. Move the Turn 1,2,3 grandstand a bit further and combine T1,2,3 into a Hairpain followed by a chicane.</p><p>2. Keep the bumps. i like to see some sparks coming out of the back of the cars.</p><p>3. Keep T10 the way it is. but removing those HUGEEE concrete blocks.</p><p>4. Combine T22 and 23 into a slow 90 degrees left hander. (but im not sure this would work because there wouldnt be much run off areas left)</p><p>ive put together a REALLY simple drawing of my modification (im not good with photoshop etc). Black lines represent the modification and the purple line represents the pit lane entry.</p><p>Drawing:<br
/> <a
href="http://i41.tinypic.com/2zjjq14.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i41.tinypic.com/2zjjq14.jpg</a></p><p>There really isnt much you can do about the track because of the layout of the streets. With my modification T1 would be the only overtaking point of the track.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: beneboy</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231514</link> <dc:creator>beneboy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231514</guid> <description>I&#039;d leave the bumps, makes it harder for the drivers so they should stay.The only changes I&#039;d make to the track would be to the pits, the exit &amp; entry are dangerous so should be changed, other than that they should leave it as it is.We&#039;ve had lots of changes to the cars this season so should keep the tracks as unchanged as possible to give us an honest comparison.I&#039;m getting sick of them changing the tracks too, it all starts off with good intentions but you end up with a corner like the new Bus Stop at Spa.
Unless it&#039;s to prevent serious accidents they should leave them alone.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d leave the bumps, makes it harder for the drivers so they should stay.</p><p>The only changes I&#8217;d make to the track would be to the pits, the exit &amp; entry are dangerous so should be changed, other than that they should leave it as it is.</p><p>We&#8217;ve had lots of changes to the cars this season so should keep the tracks as unchanged as possible to give us an honest comparison.</p><p>I&#8217;m getting sick of them changing the tracks too, it all starts off with good intentions but you end up with a corner like the new Bus Stop at Spa.<br
/> Unless it&#8217;s to prevent serious accidents they should leave them alone.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pete Walker</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231465</link> <dc:creator>Pete Walker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:30:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231465</guid> <description>Just echoing the sentiments of everybody else really, keep the bumps as they are. It saddens me to see the drivers act like such a bunch of prima donnas and whinge about bumps on a street circuit. Go back 25 years and I&#039;m sure you could find bumpy sections on just about every circuit on the calendar and everybody managed just fine.I like the turn 10 chicane too. A little idiosyncracy that, if left unchanged, will become an iconic corner of the Marina Bay circuit.So leave the damn bumps alone. And for that matter, give Monaco&#039;s Sainte Devote its barriers back!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just echoing the sentiments of everybody else really, keep the bumps as they are. It saddens me to see the drivers act like such a bunch of prima donnas and whinge about bumps on a street circuit. Go back 25 years and I&#8217;m sure you could find bumpy sections on just about every circuit on the calendar and everybody managed just fine.</p><p>I like the turn 10 chicane too. A little idiosyncracy that, if left unchanged, will become an iconic corner of the Marina Bay circuit.</p><p>So leave the damn bumps alone. And for that matter, give Monaco&#8217;s Sainte Devote its barriers back!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PJA</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231457</link> <dc:creator>PJA</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:51:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231457</guid> <description>I think the F1 calendar should have all types of circuit on it so keep the bumps. Apart from that I don&#039;t want to see it made easy, but there is definatly scope for some changes such as the pit entrance.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the F1 calendar should have all types of circuit on it so keep the bumps. Apart from that I don&#8217;t want to see it made easy, but there is definatly scope for some changes such as the pit entrance.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sumedh</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231438</link> <dc:creator>sumedh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231438</guid> <description>No one touch any bumps. If at all; I would suggest adding bumps to other tracks. The drivers need to EARN their millions..Turn 10 tortoises can be removed. But I would like if they raised the curbs like Magny Cours. We would have shots of cars first on their right wheels; then left; then right again ! ! !Pit-lane entrance could be changed; but how? I have no clue</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one touch any bumps. If at all; I would suggest adding bumps to other tracks. The drivers need to EARN their millions..</p><p>Turn 10 tortoises can be removed. But I would like if they raised the curbs like Magny Cours. We would have shots of cars first on their right wheels; then left; then right again ! ! !</p><p>Pit-lane entrance could be changed; but how? I have no clue</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pink Peril</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231384</link> <dc:creator>Pink Peril</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:13:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231384</guid> <description>I liked the chicane at turn 10. While I am not generally in favour of chicanes, that one did produce a few fireworks &amp; as someone above said coined the &quot;Wall of Champions Singapore-style&quot;, so I think keep it as is.
I also liked the bumps (although the drivers may disagree with me) - the shower of sparks was something to behold in the night sky.I also like the Bay grandstand - it was me that was sitting there Keith - where the cars go between your legs as it were. Truly unique and amazing to watch. Plus if you ever want to go deaf, go stand in the tunnel there when 3 or 4 cars are coming through - should do the job nicely.Definitely the pit entrance should be changed though. Dangerous and unsightly.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked the chicane at turn 10. While I am not generally in favour of chicanes, that one did produce a few fireworks &amp; as someone above said coined the &#8220;Wall of Champions Singapore-style&#8221;, so I think keep it as is.<br
/> I also liked the bumps (although the drivers may disagree with me) &#8211; the shower of sparks was something to behold in the night sky.</p><p>I also like the Bay grandstand &#8211; it was me that was sitting there Keith &#8211; where the cars go between your legs as it were. Truly unique and amazing to watch. Plus if you ever want to go deaf, go stand in the tunnel there when 3 or 4 cars are coming through &#8211; should do the job nicely.</p><p>Definitely the pit entrance should be changed though. Dangerous and unsightly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jonesracing82</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231377</link> <dc:creator>Jonesracing82</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:29:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231377</guid> <description>i wouldnt change anything, except for sily artificial turn for example after the turn 10/a/b/c chicane, there&#039;s another artificial chicane which does nothing to enhance overtaking, in fact hindering it if some makes an error at 10 they cant get by as the 11 chicane is too close and only a 1 car turn! in stead, make a quick blast right/left as they speed is low cos of the t10 chicane b4 it, the danger wont b there!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldnt change anything, except for sily artificial turn for example after the turn 10/a/b/c chicane, there&#8217;s another artificial chicane which does nothing to enhance overtaking, in fact hindering it if some makes an error at 10 they cant get by as the 11 chicane is too close and only a 1 car turn! in stead, make a quick blast right/left as they speed is low cos of the t10 chicane b4 it, the danger wont b there!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231369</link> <dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231369</guid> <description>I think tn 10 is great so i hope they leave it be. Pit lane should be tweeked a little.
As for the bumps, the only area i would change would be that left hander (i think is 6 or 7) where the only genuine corner to overtake is. I remember an interview with Nico Rosberg after he took Jarno were he said it was a seriously scary moment for him. Maybe if that was smoother we may see a bit more overtaking there. Rather than someone losing it under braking as that wall looks pretty unforgiving lolBut i wouldnt mind in the slightest if they didnt change it at all as i thought i was just fantastic!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think tn 10 is great so i hope they leave it be. Pit lane should be tweeked a little.<br
/> As for the bumps, the only area i would change would be that left hander (i think is 6 or 7) where the only genuine corner to overtake is. I remember an interview with Nico Rosberg after he took Jarno were he said it was a seriously scary moment for him. Maybe if that was smoother we may see a bit more overtaking there. Rather than someone losing it under braking as that wall looks pretty unforgiving lol</p><p>But i wouldnt mind in the slightest if they didnt change it at all as i thought i was just fantastic!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steven Roy</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231365</link> <dc:creator>Steven Roy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:12:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231365</guid> <description>I don&#039;t understand how the track ever got a safety certificate.  Reversing the direction of the track made the pit entry ridiculously dangerous.  Remember the Trulli incident.  The pit exit fed into a chicane which is stupid to a ridiculous level.I don&#039;t like that all tracks are billiard table smooth but so long as wings are allowed teams will choose to make drivers suffer rather than compromise performance by raising the ride height and softening the suspension.  Drivers will always choose a competitive car ove a car with better ride.The biggest problem for me is the marshalls. They were utterly incompetent and any remotely serious accident could easily have resulted in a death.  It is unacceptable that they were allowed to be so bad once but if it were to happen again and a serious injury or worse resulted the FIA should end up in court and those reponsible should be locked up and have the key thrown away.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand how the track ever got a safety certificate.  Reversing the direction of the track made the pit entry ridiculously dangerous.  Remember the Trulli incident.  The pit exit fed into a chicane which is stupid to a ridiculous level.</p><p>I don&#8217;t like that all tracks are billiard table smooth but so long as wings are allowed teams will choose to make drivers suffer rather than compromise performance by raising the ride height and softening the suspension.  Drivers will always choose a competitive car ove a car with better ride.</p><p>The biggest problem for me is the marshalls. They were utterly incompetent and any remotely serious accident could easily have resulted in a death.  It is unacceptable that they were allowed to be so bad once but if it were to happen again and a serious injury or worse resulted the FIA should end up in court and those reponsible should be locked up and have the key thrown away.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: zplol</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231335</link> <dc:creator>zplol</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:43:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231335</guid> <description>I would keep the turn 10 bumps but change them from the small half-circle shape to a more standard double plan shape while keeping its height. I&#039;m sure it would still cause drivers to take off but maybe in a more predictable way. It would probably wouldn&#039;t be as bad if the cars hits them aswell.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would keep the turn 10 bumps but change them from the small half-circle shape to a more standard double plan shape while keeping its height. I&#8217;m sure it would still cause drivers to take off but maybe in a more predictable way. It would probably wouldn&#8217;t be as bad if the cars hits them aswell.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chalky</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231329</link> <dc:creator>Chalky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:43:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231329</guid> <description>Turn 10 is a classic corner. It&#039;s rather unique.
It provides a challenge.
I think they should see how the new cars handle on it for 1 more year before changing anything.Pitlane - Maybe they could start the pitlane from T20 and run it round the back of the Singapore Flyer and then round to the pits. It would make one very long entry to the pitlane, but it would be a safer option.and keep the bumps. :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turn 10 is a classic corner. It&#8217;s rather unique.<br
/> It provides a challenge.<br
/> I think they should see how the new cars handle on it for 1 more year before changing anything.</p><p>Pitlane &#8211; Maybe they could start the pitlane from T20 and run it round the back of the Singapore Flyer and then round to the pits. It would make one very long entry to the pitlane, but it would be a safer option.</p><p>and keep the bumps. <img
src='http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231316</link> <dc:creator>David</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:11:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231316</guid> <description>Not a good pit exit even for clockwise track...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a good pit exit even for clockwise track&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Spencer</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231315</link> <dc:creator>John Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:10:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231315</guid> <description>I don&#039;t know about the bumps - didn&#039;t Mark Webber say he had to be careful not to put his tongue between his teeth &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/09/27/singapore-gp-the-toughest-race-in-f1/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;in case he bit it off&lt;/a&gt;?The guy&#039;s had enough problems with his leg, I wouldn&#039;t want him suffering a speech-threatening tongue injury as well.But then again, why would you put your tongue between your teeth anyway?  And wouldn&#039;t a more Stig-like mute Webber be more enigmatic?  On second thoughts, keep the bumps.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about the bumps &#8211; didn&#8217;t Mark Webber say he had to be careful not to put his tongue between his teeth <a
href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2008/09/27/singapore-gp-the-toughest-race-in-f1/" rel="nofollow">in case he bit it off</a>?</p><p>The guy&#8217;s had enough problems with his leg, I wouldn&#8217;t want him suffering a speech-threatening tongue injury as well.</p><p>But then again, why would you put your tongue between your teeth anyway?  And wouldn&#8217;t a more Stig-like mute Webber be more enigmatic?  On second thoughts, keep the bumps.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Journeyer</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231314</link> <dc:creator>Journeyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:25:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231314</guid> <description>The reason the pit straight is a mess is because it was designed with a CLOCKWISE direction in mind.  After the revisions meant it became COUNTER-CLOCKWISE, the pit straight design was never changed.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason the pit straight is a mess is because it was designed with a CLOCKWISE direction in mind.  After the revisions meant it became COUNTER-CLOCKWISE, the pit straight design was never changed.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alianora La Canta</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231310</link> <dc:creator>Alianora La Canta</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:02:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231310</guid> <description>They can&#039;t shorten the race at Singapore unless the organisers are granted an exemption by the FIA (like Monaco). Total race distance is governed by the number of complete laps it takes to cover 305km, though due to the aforementioned exemption, Monaco is only 269km. Personally, I don&#039;t think it needs shortening. Circuits like the Valencia city race need shortening, but the best solution for that is to make the city segment 0km and transfer the whole thing to the permanent circuit 12km away.There was only one modification that I felt was needed to Turn 10 and it was made before qualifying last year. Given how effective the first line of &quot;tortoises&quot; was at deterring chicane-cutters, the second line of them simply made it harder for drivers to do anything about mistakes. While a left-hander could work there, it wouldn&#039;t be as interesting for drivers or spectators. At least Singapore is a track with more than one interesting corner...The bumps, while large, were fine, and worked especially well in the night because of the sparks generated. It&#039;s not a comfortable circuit, but then a calender with 18 comfy circuits would be rather dull.Whether re-profiling the original complex is worthwhile depends on what they do with it. Those three turns are not doing what they were supposed to do but I&#039;m not sure a better solution could be completed without running into planning permission issues.The pit straight is a mess and really, really needs sorting out. I can hope that the 1/2/3 reconfiguration encompasses a better pit exit, but someone needs to tell the organisers that the pit entry needs sorting out as well because it is currently an unnecessary hazard.As for the marshalls, their performance was sub-standard. Hopefully a year of doing F1, plus whatever other races they marshall at, will improve performance. One does wonder how the theoretical speed they must presumably have showed at some point (to be permitted to marshal, you have to do efficient work at some race...) was lost when F1 came to town.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can&#8217;t shorten the race at Singapore unless the organisers are granted an exemption by the FIA (like Monaco). Total race distance is governed by the number of complete laps it takes to cover 305km, though due to the aforementioned exemption, Monaco is only 269km. Personally, I don&#8217;t think it needs shortening. Circuits like the Valencia city race need shortening, but the best solution for that is to make the city segment 0km and transfer the whole thing to the permanent circuit 12km away.</p><p>There was only one modification that I felt was needed to Turn 10 and it was made before qualifying last year. Given how effective the first line of &#8220;tortoises&#8221; was at deterring chicane-cutters, the second line of them simply made it harder for drivers to do anything about mistakes. While a left-hander could work there, it wouldn&#8217;t be as interesting for drivers or spectators. At least Singapore is a track with more than one interesting corner&#8230;</p><p>The bumps, while large, were fine, and worked especially well in the night because of the sparks generated. It&#8217;s not a comfortable circuit, but then a calender with 18 comfy circuits would be rather dull.</p><p>Whether re-profiling the original complex is worthwhile depends on what they do with it. Those three turns are not doing what they were supposed to do but I&#8217;m not sure a better solution could be completed without running into planning permission issues.</p><p>The pit straight is a mess and really, really needs sorting out. I can hope that the 1/2/3 reconfiguration encompasses a better pit exit, but someone needs to tell the organisers that the pit entry needs sorting out as well because it is currently an unnecessary hazard.</p><p>As for the marshalls, their performance was sub-standard. Hopefully a year of doing F1, plus whatever other races they marshall at, will improve performance. One does wonder how the theoretical speed they must presumably have showed at some point (to be permitted to marshal, you have to do efficient work at some race&#8230;) was lost when F1 came to town.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: iceshiel</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231306</link> <dc:creator>iceshiel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:43:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231306</guid> <description>I know it sounds silly but i think it might be interesting to extend the length of the starting straight.Let the track run all the way to Republic Avenue. After that it&#039;s one left turn into Republic Boulevard, which will be long and straight like Raffles Boulevard. By doing that turn 5 will be an overtaking spot just like turn 7.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it sounds silly but i think it might be interesting to extend the length of the starting straight.</p><p>Let the track run all the way to Republic Avenue. After that it&#8217;s one left turn into Republic Boulevard, which will be long and straight like Raffles Boulevard. By doing that turn 5 will be an overtaking spot just like turn 7.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: El Gordo</title><link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/08/would-you-get-rid-of-singapores-bumps/comment-page-1/#comment-231305</link> <dc:creator>El Gordo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:34:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15158#comment-231305</guid> <description>The only bit I&#039;d go about changing of Singapore is the Pit Entry and Corners 1-3.  There could be a bit more excitement about that first section, to encourage some more over taking, and the pit entry is just dangerous.Other than that, keep the chicane and keep the bumps.  It made it a challenge for drivers to stay on the track, and isn&#039;t that the what F1 is all about?  Obviously, I want it to be safe, but it is supposed to be the &lt;em&gt;ultimate&lt;/em&gt; motoring challenge - not something that could be said about Malaysia or Bahrain (unless the challenge is meant to be fighting off boredom).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only bit I&#8217;d go about changing of Singapore is the Pit Entry and Corners 1-3.  There could be a bit more excitement about that first section, to encourage some more over taking, and the pit entry is just dangerous.</p><p>Other than that, keep the chicane and keep the bumps.  It made it a challenge for drivers to stay on the track, and isn&#8217;t that the what F1 is all about?  Obviously, I want it to be safe, but it is supposed to be the <em>ultimate</em> motoring challenge &#8211; not something that could be said about Malaysia or Bahrain (unless the challenge is meant to be fighting off boredom).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/28 queries in 0.033 seconds using apc

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2010-03-21 02:27:05 -->