<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F60: another name change for Ferrari</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-232362</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-232362</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a good shape but the history associated with it is grim. I like the 156 &#039;Sharknose&#039; and the sleek 640 with black front and rear wings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good shape but the history associated with it is grim. I like the 156 &#8216;Sharknose&#8217; and the sleek 640 with black front and rear wings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-232360</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-232360</guid>
		<description>Good ides Dasman - the difficulty though is getting pictures of the cars that are (a) in colour and (b) legal to use.

This year&#039;s Ferrari is a slightly different shade to last years, but still more of a proper red than those earlier 2000s ones you mention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ides Dasman &#8211; the difficulty though is getting pictures of the cars that are (a) in colour and (b) legal to use.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s Ferrari is a slightly different shade to last years, but still more of a proper red than those earlier 2000s ones you mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DASMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-232321</link>
		<dc:creator>DASMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-232321</guid>
		<description>Keith, Good article - ever done an article on the different colours that ferrari have used over the years on their cars?

I notice that they seem to have returned to the more scarlet colours of the early 90&#039;s which I prefer to the oranges of 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, Good article &#8211; ever done an article on the different colours that ferrari have used over the years on their cars?</p>
<p>I notice that they seem to have returned to the more scarlet colours of the early 90&#8242;s which I prefer to the oranges of 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231988</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231988</guid>
		<description>The numbering may perhaps be some kind of code for an Italian enigma machine... kinda like the team really lol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbering may perhaps be some kind of code for an Italian enigma machine&#8230; kinda like the team really lol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231903</guid>
		<description>The F60 doesn&#039;t look as bad as I expected to be. I was going by what the Hondas and BMWs looked like, and those are bad. The Ferrari on the other hand, seems to be a little more easy on the eye, don&#039;t know why, maybe because its a Ferrari.

What are you&#039;re favourite Ferrari&#039;s of all time? Mine goes to Gilles Villenueve&#039;s No.27 of 1982, class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The F60 doesn&#8217;t look as bad as I expected to be. I was going by what the Hondas and BMWs looked like, and those are bad. The Ferrari on the other hand, seems to be a little more easy on the eye, don&#8217;t know why, maybe because its a Ferrari.</p>
<p>What are you&#8217;re favourite Ferrari&#8217;s of all time? Mine goes to Gilles Villenueve&#8217;s No.27 of 1982, class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231897</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231897</guid>
		<description>This car is named for Ferrari&#039;s 60 years in GP racing and they are planning to release the new F60 production car this year as well.I read a small bit about it at fantasycars.net.....0 -60 in 3 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This car is named for Ferrari&#8217;s 60 years in GP racing and they are planning to release the new F60 production car this year as well.I read a small bit about it at fantasycars.net&#8230;..0 -60 in 3 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231891</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231891</guid>
		<description>The days of car numbers based on the different engine configurations don&#039;t work so well when everyone&#039;s fixed on a 2.4-litre V8...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The days of car numbers based on the different engine configurations don&#8217;t work so well when everyone&#8217;s fixed on a 2.4-litre V8&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231889</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231889</guid>
		<description>Keith - &lt;blockquote&gt;That was last year though.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Is this another Millenium-type issue?

NML - &lt;blockquote&gt;I think it’s a one off just for the 60th Anniversary of Ferrari.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think it&#039;s actually a tip-of-the-hat to Ferrari&#039;s 60th season in F1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>That was last year though.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is this another Millenium-type issue?</p>
<p>NML &#8211;<br />
<blockquote>I think it’s a one off just for the 60th Anniversary of Ferrari.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it&#8217;s actually a tip-of-the-hat to Ferrari&#8217;s 60th season in F1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chaostheory</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231879</link>
		<dc:creator>chaostheory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231879</guid>
		<description>I thing if the F60 will be succesfull they can stick with that naming scheme for next years. Besides it sounds more Ferrari-like than F2009, F2010 and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thing if the F60 will be succesfull they can stick with that naming scheme for next years. Besides it sounds more Ferrari-like than F2009, F2010 and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Fallon</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/01/13/f60-another-name-change-for-ferrari/comment-page-1/#comment-231875</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Fallon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=15817#comment-231875</guid>
		<description>Sorry if this is a bit off topic keith, but i thought you might want to have a look at this? :)

http://formula-1.updatesport.com/news/article/1231844302/formula_one/F1headlines/Fry-and-Brawn-in-buy-out/view.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if this is a bit off topic keith, but i thought you might want to have a look at this? <img src='http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://formula-1.updatesport.com/news/article/1231844302/formula_one/F1headlines/Fry-and-Brawn-in-buy-out/view.html" rel="nofollow">http://formula-1.updatesport.com/news/article/1231844302/formula_one/F1headlines/Fry-and-Brawn-in-buy-out/view.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 14/28 queries in 0.076 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 480/492 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 10:26:12 -->
