Diffuser row set to drag on

Posted on Author Keith Collantine

Brawn GP, Williams and Toyota’s diffusers have been given the all-clear by the stewards in Melbourne.

But Ferrari, BMW, Renault and Red Bull are intending to protest the decision. This means a Court of Appeal hearing into the legality of the parts will have to be held, most likely in the week after the Malaysian Grand Prix next weekend.

This would mean that three teams are participating in the next two races not knowing if their cars are legal or not. If their diffusers are subsequently declared illegal drivers could be stripped of wins and points. Hopefully it won’t come to this.

The diffuser dispute first came to light in January, and it’s lamentable the FIA wasn’t able to get its act together and sort out the new rules so the season could begin without yet more needless controversy. Perhaps they could have gotten their act together if they had spent less time bickering with the F1 teams over a points system no-one wants.

41 comments on “Diffuser row set to drag on”

  1. Bigbadderboom
    26th March 2009, 15:24

    It’s taking the shine off this weekend a bit for me. It is frustrating but I think they will get cleared as legal in the end, and althoiugh the races may appear to be running under appeal, I am going to make the presumption that the oprder they cross the line will be the reality!! Adrian Newey has been quoted as saying the diffuser are “clever” and not illegal, and thats good enough for me!!!

  2. Love the pun Keith….

    1. Sush Meerkat
      26th March 2009, 15:55

      SECOND THAT!
      superb.

    2. Oh, I only just got it then :(

    3. hopefully they will ‘clear the air’ fairly soon….

      i’ll get my coat..

  3. It doesn’t really bother me, we see these sorts of issues every few years, some teams read the rules to the letter, others read between the lines.

    I think Red Bull’s problem with the diffusers is that their car isn’t designed to take advantage of this ‘loophole’ if it’s deemed legal.

  4. So F1 Tech said legal, Stewards say legal, Now a Court of Appeals. So if they say legal what happens then. Is there another process or is that it?

    1. Jess
      If the oourt of appeal (The FIA) decides for Williams. Toyota and Brawn that is the final answer. As all three teams are essentially using the crash structure of the car to increase the dimensions of the rear diffuser, it won’t be long before the all the remaining teams start exploting these loopholes to create huge difussers and gain back all of the dowsnforce lost in the new regs. OWG made these new dimensions and because the OWG is essentially a group of competitors inventing rules (to make the racing more excitting) we are in new territory. The FIA is so misguided anything could happen. Formula 1 has a history of designers exploiting loopholes (fan cars, ground effect, wings, turbos, etc) only for eventually these loopholes are closed and the racing goes on.

  5. Jess, the other seven teams then copy it

    1. I figured that if it is deemed legal the other will go after it. I bet most of the teams have already built or building it right now just incase it gets a green light. F1 has more drama off track than on. I am still looking forward to the racing this weekend.

  6. So they’ve been deemed legal twice now, yet still they’re planning to appeal. They should be told that they can’t appeal, on grounds of being petty. They could just keep going on and on all season. Stupid.

    1. They should be told that they can’t appeal, on grounds of being petty.

      If I was in charge they would!

    2. Run for FIA prez, I’d vote for you! So long as I get a cushy deputy job, k?

  7. I’m a lawyer by trade (well, nearly – just finished my 5 years today) and it’s a fairly fundamental thing that things can’t be deemed illegal retrospectively – surely it should be the same in F1, so any points should stand even if the part is later banned.

    1. Congratulations Rod!

    2. Mouse_Nightshirt
      26th March 2009, 20:07

      That’s true in criminal and civil law, but this is sporting regulation.

      In any case, gratz mate! Go work for the FIA please and sort them out!

  8. Rod, the rule of law means nothing in the F! world. Legalities shift like the sand on a beach.

    1. I’m well aware of that! I only started to watch F1 regularly again in 2007 after a 9 year gap, it’s just a shame that the regulatory bodies haven’t improved at all in that time.

  9. What do the other teams have to do now to make their own? Seeing as the elevated rear crash structure setup allowed for them to exploit this loophole, will the other teams need to modify any major part of the car, or can a new diffuser design simply be ‘bolted’ on?

    1. Not quite as simple as that, Jason. Mario Theissen has already said that the design of the BMW’s gearbox casing means that it cannot be adjusted to fit a diffuser similar to the contested ones. So it would involve designing a new gearbox casing…

    2. Toby Bushby
      27th March 2009, 0:32

      Not to mention that the rest of the underside of the cars, from nose to tail, has been designed to send air in the right way to these “diffusers”. I’m sure versions can be made for some teams, but fundamental changes would need to be made to the other cars to get the full benefit.

  10. There is one more step after the Court of Appeal (FIA), that is the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). And they can take six months.

  11. If they were illegal, they would have been told by now.
    Expect them to quietly vanish between this race and the next, however ?

  12. A third of the field will be running in cars this weekend that have used an innovative approach to the diffuser element. All three teams have had their cars scrutineered and passed as being within the tech regs as laided down by the FIA and agreed by all the teams.

    Sounds like an awful lot of sour grapes from the 6 teams whose designers failed to find a better solution than they will be fielding this weekend. Get your scribes back on the job boys and live with it until you can fix it. The time for political posteuring is past.

    Bring on the chariots and let the games begin.

    Salty.

    ps.6 teams might want to review their designers bonus schemes for 2009… ;)

  13. Clive, while I agree that it is a setback for BMW, I would say that it is their fault for not seeing the possibilities sooner. If you recall the early days of testing, team Willy was wondering aloud how many teams would copy them. The smart ones will, the ones that can’t will have to figure out a plan C. You can have the most expensive wind-tunnel in F1 and the most powerful computer in Europe to crunch the data that comes out of it, but at the end of the day, human ingenuity trumps all that.

    1. And I would agree with you, Arnet. As a BMW supporter, I wish that they had seen and exploited the loophole first; but they didn’t and now the casing makes it very difficult to join the rush to have a fancy diffuser. My hope is that the Beemer is good enough in other areas to make up for anything it loses in the diffuser department.

  14. Apparantly Williams diffuser was cleared by the FIA over a year ago, according to Formula1.com

    So I think they are confident going to the Court of Appeal.

    1. When the Williams FW31 was launched in January, Williams technical director Sam Michael said: “To be honest we were surprised that it even turned into an issue because for us it was very clearly inside the regulations.

      It was something that in various forms teams have been doing for two years, so it wasn’t really a big issue for us or the FIA. So it was something that we clarified with the FIA well over a year ago.

      “There wasn’t really any confusion from our side, although there appeared to be some confusion from the other teams, but I don’t know on what basis that was.

      “During the development, to be quite honest, we thought everyone would do it. It wasn’t something that we really thought was trick. It was a previous interpretation of the new regulations.”

  15. The teams got the complaints in and left the door open for an appeal in case the “dodgy diffusor lot” are too successful or even win. If the big guys wouldn’t have done that, it would be a lot more difficult for them to have the results revised. Now if the “dodgy diffusor lot” are too strong, the “righteous ones” can say “we told you so, look! Our cars had no chance to overtake as the air was dirty behind them, they could overtake us easily, blablabla”. Politics…

    1. Toby Bushby
      27th March 2009, 0:37

      Politics is right. The FIA has (deliberately, in my opinion) left the door open to ban these elements if Brawn, Williams or Toyota dominate the early races. I believe it’s called standardization.

  16. Wow. New regulations; same Ferrari. Whenever they’re getting beaten on the track, they launch some technical protest and whine about their competition’s “unfair” advantage.

    Get over it, you whiny ******! Brawn found a loophole in the regulations, and they exploited it. You could have found the same loophole. Or wait, maybe you couldn’t have, because your former technical ace-in-the-hole is now the one exploiting loopholes and whooping your **** on the track with his own team after saving it from ruin.

    Oh, and Ross Brawn is God.

  17. Toby Bushby
    27th March 2009, 0:38

    Easy, Paige. The first race hasn’t even started yet, lol!

  18. Yeah the appeal will get thrown out and it’ll be racing as usual.

    with williams, toyota and brawn in front the other boys will update their cars to suit as soon as they can no doubt.

  19. This is excellent, I love all the fighting and quarrelling. What would be the fun of F1 if there were not any controversies. This is what F1 is all about; this is why we are so fascinated by this mad sport. If Renault and the others had interpreted the rules like brainy Brawn et al there would be no fuss. They are furiously jealous, as they do not have the shiny toy. Its great…..long may the chaos continue.

  20. did we see the former honda team moaning about the other teams when there car was a bag of c**p?
    Seems Ferrari & a few others hate being back markers.
    If Brawn gp are as quock as we think then the other teams will soon be playing catch up with similar diffusers etc.
    Just remember Brawn maybe ahead already & like any other team will develope further during the seson sure is going to be a good 1.

  21. I think bottom line will show decisions being made with an additional level of technical limitations, some wise vision that – yes – rules just nearly never encompass all elements the inventive mind of man could come up with, and a considerable amount of political composition. All in all, this is invention, regulation and politics setting off boundaries of man existence, as allways. Hope the other teams can level off with Brawn after all that and make competition turn out to be what really catches fans attention. If not, would we all be the audience of a change of forces in F1?

  22. I think we can be pretty sure that if the best brain in F1, Ross Braun, thinks his car is legal, then it is. He had 15 months to check it against the regs, and he sure don’t make too many mistakes.
    Where that leaves us is: how determined will the FIA be to cook the books in order to engineer the outcome of the season? The omens aren’t too good here, as we saw when Hammy came in and was given all kinds of preferential treatment in his first season. Remember the JCB incident, or Hungary, for example?
    Massa absolutely hit the nail on the head with his comment that Brawn could win the title by halfway through the season. Boy did he touch a tender place. If there is anything more sacred to F1 than the championship being decided on the very last race, I don’t know what. So you can bet that the establishment is going to move heaven and earth to cut Brawn down to size before they do the unthinkable and depart from the long established script.
    As the Brawn diffuser will certainly be legal (as I believe), the teams who didn’t bother to read the rules will have to take an entirely different tack. It would appear that that will have to be that, although Brawn read the rules, he didn’t read the minds of the regulators to divine what they would have liked to put in but were too lazy or incompetent to specify.
    If that approach wins the rule book won’t be worth a brass farthing ever again.
    I am not too hopeful that sanity will prevail. Just think how many tens of millions Mercedes alone have already thrown at the ludicrous KERS nonsense. In grand prix, big money talks.

  23. The new cars are just plain ugly on top and bottom…lol. And the dust covers look atrocious.The new cars look about as sexy as a Trabant…

  24. Funtastic!!!!

  25. I love placing sports bets online. Unfortunately for me, I’m down since I started my soccer betting journey but I’ve been on the upswing. Here is one thing I have learnt in my online sports betting experiences. Do your research! Find out whos injured, not 100% healthy, home team, away team, etc. Once you have the facts place a bet!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.