Comments on: Lewis Hamilton excluded from Australian Grand Prix, Trulli third

By: DryYoshi

DryYoshi — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:08:48 +0000

:lll

By: Rehti

Rehti — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:13:42 +0000

“Lie hard” Hamilton.

By: CD

CD — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 04:19:15 +0000

Why do people think that Mclaren will learn from this mistake? In fact they will not learn from it and will do it again and again and again. trust me, why? because they didn’t learn from the spygate scandal at all.

By: axt

axt — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:47:49 +0000

yeah the F1 drivers n the teams hate him but the reason is not bcoz he lied (coz they lie everytime… only thing is that FIA close their eyes when it comes to certian teams n drivers) it’s just that lewis’s is damn good …….

By: Pink Peril

Pink Peril — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:08:58 +0000

Please show me the “rule” where speaking to the stewards after the race alters the race result if you have been found to be economical with your version of events?

And I ask you again, was Hamilton under oath?

Racing starts and ends on track as far as I’m concerned.

By: Pink Peril

Pink Peril — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:42:28 +0000

Touche.

Seems this subject has attracted a lot of folks whose hatred for Lewis blinds them to reality.

You just have to ask yourself why, don’t you? Not even MS at his worst attracted this sort of vilification.

On another note, I see the FIA has gone very silent on their Race Against Racism campaign…..

By: Pink Peril

Pink Peril — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:37:42 +0000

Scott Joslin – I assume you are British?

Then you’d do well to remember that famous “British Justice” you are so proud of, as enshrined in the Magna Carta.

There just so happens to be a little fundamental inclusion in the British Justice System that you are innocent until proven guilty. So where is the proof?
And remember, some bland press release from the FIA is not proof. Please provide your evidence that Lewis is ‘guilty’. I’m sure I’m not the only person who would like to see it. And was this a tribunal where Lewis was under oath? Did he swear to tell the truth? And why are the FIA suddenly such moral watchdogs, given S&Max is their president? Hardly a ringing endorsement.

I’d also like to remind you that court transcripts are generally available to the public in the real world. So why is the FIA not releasing the transcripts of the meeting?

By: Blender

Blender — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 20:14:07 +0000

Why Brits always causing problems ?

By: ChiefDee

ChiefDee — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:48:58 +0000

I think we are all missing the point. How many times was Lewis punished unfairly last season. F1 are saying to MacLaren ‘we don’t want Lewis to race, find somebody else’ MacLaren is being punished for it… it is a sport and like all sport… there is a boss and if the boss doesn’t like you …tough…. It is going to be another ****** tough year for Lewieeeeeeee lol

By: kate

kate — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:23:28 +0000

Throughly agree with your comment, Senor Paz. Reading through all these comments, one thought struck me, what if Hamilton did end up at Ferrari as one of their drivers. What would all of the FIA is anti-Hamilton but pro-Ferrari conspirators have to say. I mean the FIA would be so torn between its two supposed objectives. The FIA make a decision that in no way assists Ferrari as both their cars failed in the race and yet people are still saying the decision was made to assist Ferrari. The only thing I will criticise is the time in which the decision was made. If you look at other sports like horse racing which involve stewards, the decision occurs within a short time after the race. In F1, there seems to be too much of a rush to get to the podium and the spraying of the champagne. I guess it is due to the ratings for the podium and the post race interviews. Good ratings but bad press later for not delaying result. I think Trulli was honest throughout and I can’t believe that McLaren didn’t just admit to be confused and just accept the lost of 1 point in 4th position!