<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons for F1 in NASCAR&#8217;s horror crash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: USF1fan</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-4/#comment-257230</link>
		<dc:creator>USF1fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 06:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-257230</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why the cars were going that fast when it was known that the safety car was coming out.  The other thing to watch is the guy at the end of the pit lane.  You can see him wave the safety car out right as the race leaders are coming up on pit exit.  I would say that even though there were lots of things done wrong, most of the blame should be on the guy that gave the safety car the go ahead at an unsafe time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why the cars were going that fast when it was known that the safety car was coming out.  The other thing to watch is the guy at the end of the pit lane.  You can see him wave the safety car out right as the race leaders are coming up on pit exit.  I would say that even though there were lots of things done wrong, most of the blame should be on the guy that gave the safety car the go ahead at an unsafe time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scunnyman</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-257173</link>
		<dc:creator>scunnyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-257173</guid>
		<description>I reckon it was definitely the safety car drivers fault, but at the same time the drivers would have known it was coming out and where so should have slowed down more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon it was definitely the safety car drivers fault, but at the same time the drivers would have known it was coming out and where so should have slowed down more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-257163</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-257163</guid>
		<description>Keith.  Not sure where to post this but I was wondering if you saw todays serious safety car crash at the 2nd WTCC race in Pau France.  It was quite dramatic!  I&#039;ve not been able to find video of it just yet but tought you might want to post an entry of this under safety car lessons to be learnt...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith.  Not sure where to post this but I was wondering if you saw todays serious safety car crash at the 2nd WTCC race in Pau France.  It was quite dramatic!  I&#8217;ve not been able to find video of it just yet but tought you might want to post an entry of this under safety car lessons to be learnt&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254692</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254692</guid>
		<description>heres the  link 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5QT2V-OCXs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heres the  link<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5QT2V-OCXs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5QT2V-OCXs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trey</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254691</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 23:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254691</guid>
		<description>speaking of the adjustable rear wings. If that rear wing breaks and the driver tries to turn his car even slightly all hell breaks loose. Does anyone remember Catherine Leguie&#039;s crash at road America in 2006. At &quot;The Kink&quot; going 170 mph. 

here is the video (she wasn&#039;t hurt but the crash looked bad) ...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5QT2V-OCXs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of the adjustable rear wings. If that rear wing breaks and the driver tries to turn his car even slightly all hell breaks loose. Does anyone remember Catherine Leguie&#8217;s crash at road America in 2006. At &#8220;The Kink&#8221; going 170 mph. </p>
<p>here is the video (she wasn&#8217;t hurt but the crash looked bad) &#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5QT2V-OCXs" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254623</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254623</guid>
		<description>I hope Nascar don&#039;t have a knee jerk reaction to this and instead spend their time and money and energy in reinforcing the barriers, period...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope Nascar don&#8217;t have a knee jerk reaction to this and instead spend their time and money and energy in reinforcing the barriers, period&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Z</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254478</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t call the plates mere window dressing--the cars would surely be hitting 240 mph in the draft without them, and since kinetic energy increases proportionally to the square of velocity, 195 mph represents over a one-third decrease in the energies of the cars.

Also, I&#039;m no aerodynamicist, but I wonder if the 200 mph mark or thereabouts represents the beginning of a regime where the characteristics of the airflow change and become more unstable or something to that effect, so that the risk of getting airborne begins to increase exponentially.  I&#039;m really just kind of waving my hands here, and I&#039;m sure someone could put me right, but I do recall Darrell Waltrip saying something to that effect on the broadcast last week--I think he called 200 mph and above &quot;no man&#039;s land&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t call the plates mere window dressing&#8211;the cars would surely be hitting 240 mph in the draft without them, and since kinetic energy increases proportionally to the square of velocity, 195 mph represents over a one-third decrease in the energies of the cars.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m no aerodynamicist, but I wonder if the 200 mph mark or thereabouts represents the beginning of a regime where the characteristics of the airflow change and become more unstable or something to that effect, so that the risk of getting airborne begins to increase exponentially.  I&#8217;m really just kind of waving my hands here, and I&#8217;m sure someone could put me right, but I do recall Darrell Waltrip saying something to that effect on the broadcast last week&#8211;I think he called 200 mph and above &#8220;no man&#8217;s land&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theRoswellite</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254470</link>
		<dc:creator>theRoswellite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254470</guid>
		<description>This near catastrophe is not about:  

...which driver was at fault
...how the cars are configured
...fate, luck, or inevitability

It is simply about track layout, car speed, and the configuration of safety barriers separating spectators from objects entering their area at speed.

Nascar and Indycar tracks are based on layouts in which spectators surround the track...EVEN IN CORNERS. They can&#039;t change these tracks without there being a real alteration in the nature of their sport.  

A car, at speed, entering a spectator area could be the event which will bring about such a change.

Anyone designing these tracks today would put the spectators to the inside of the ovals and have the cars, pits and all related support staff outside the track....doesn&#039;t work very well for viewing does it! 

How does F1 stand? 

Next time you watch a race, mentally project a car&#039;s path at an unaltered speed in...any direction...that it is capable of moving.  If the results might be a spectator related catastrophe, then this is a real possibility. One which should not be ignored.

2009 almost entered racing history the way 1955 did, and believe me, NASCAR is very aware of their &quot;near miss&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This near catastrophe is not about:  </p>
<p>&#8230;which driver was at fault<br />
&#8230;how the cars are configured<br />
&#8230;fate, luck, or inevitability</p>
<p>It is simply about track layout, car speed, and the configuration of safety barriers separating spectators from objects entering their area at speed.</p>
<p>Nascar and Indycar tracks are based on layouts in which spectators surround the track&#8230;EVEN IN CORNERS. They can&#8217;t change these tracks without there being a real alteration in the nature of their sport.  </p>
<p>A car, at speed, entering a spectator area could be the event which will bring about such a change.</p>
<p>Anyone designing these tracks today would put the spectators to the inside of the ovals and have the cars, pits and all related support staff outside the track&#8230;.doesn&#8217;t work very well for viewing does it! </p>
<p>How does F1 stand? </p>
<p>Next time you watch a race, mentally project a car&#8217;s path at an unaltered speed in&#8230;any direction&#8230;that it is capable of moving.  If the results might be a spectator related catastrophe, then this is a real possibility. One which should not be ignored.</p>
<p>2009 almost entered racing history the way 1955 did, and believe me, NASCAR is very aware of their &#8220;near miss&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shellback</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-1/#comment-254342</link>
		<dc:creator>shellback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 06:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254342</guid>
		<description>The stands for Daytona will then be in Kansas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stands for Daytona will then be in Kansas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeK</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/05/01/lessons-for-f1-in-nascars-horror-crash/comment-page-3/#comment-254339</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 04:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=20540#comment-254339</guid>
		<description>Gman, the real solution would be to eliminate Talladega and Daytona from NASCAR racing. We also know that won&#039;t happen as those two tracks are owned by the France family that also happens to own and run the series.

You can&#039;t eliminate restrictor plates as the speeds would then rise to 220 mph+.

The only other alternative is to further strengthen the catch fences. Even then debris will still scatter through the fence openings like shrapnel, which is the cause of the recent injuries. But better shrapnel then the entire car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gman, the real solution would be to eliminate Talladega and Daytona from NASCAR racing. We also know that won&#8217;t happen as those two tracks are owned by the France family that also happens to own and run the series.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t eliminate restrictor plates as the speeds would then rise to 220 mph+.</p>
<p>The only other alternative is to further strengthen the catch fences. Even then debris will still scatter through the fence openings like shrapnel, which is the cause of the recent injuries. But better shrapnel then the entire car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 13/28 queries in 0.049 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 476/488 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 11:34:15 -->
