<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 links: N Technology readies F1 squad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:27:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260818</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 11:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260818</guid>
		<description>If Kubica doesn&#039;t be careful he might get a reputation as being grumpy lol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Kubica doesn&#8217;t be careful he might get a reputation as being grumpy lol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrickl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260568</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrickl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260568</guid>
		<description>Well if there is a problem were most teams cannot race, you can indeed say &quot;it&#039;s your own fault too bad&quot; or &quot;ok lets work this out&quot;. Good for you that they indeed told the teams to take a hike. No more Yankee F1 now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if there is a problem were most teams cannot race, you can indeed say &#8220;it&#8217;s your own fault too bad&#8221; or &#8220;ok lets work this out&#8221;. Good for you that they indeed told the teams to take a hike. No more Yankee F1 now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F1Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260553</link>
		<dc:creator>F1Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260553</guid>
		<description>The worst case scenario

he had me going...right up to the point he blames mosley for michelin&#039;s defective tires. or is he blaming mosley for adhering to published rules? this is why i no longer read grandprix.com. all that&#039;s missing is some hamilton cheerleading, or is that out of style now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst case scenario</p>
<p>he had me going&#8230;right up to the point he blames mosley for michelin&#8217;s defective tires. or is he blaming mosley for adhering to published rules? this is why i no longer read grandprix.com. all that&#8217;s missing is some hamilton cheerleading, or is that out of style now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pSynrg</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260540</link>
		<dc:creator>pSynrg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260540</guid>
		<description>Oh, maybe not - bah! Never mind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, maybe not &#8211; bah! Never mind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pSynrg</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260537</link>
		<dc:creator>pSynrg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260537</guid>
		<description>Doh, wrong thread...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doh, wrong thread&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pSynrg</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260536</link>
		<dc:creator>pSynrg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260536</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s taken me a while to come to this conclusion because of what&#039;s at stake (the loss of F1 as we know it.)

But all the teams submitting conditional entries for 2010. Drop the conditions, adopt the proposed new rules and deal with it. Just like all F1 competitors always have. Those are the rules of the game...

Anything else is just &#039;spoiled brat&#039; mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s taken me a while to come to this conclusion because of what&#8217;s at stake (the loss of F1 as we know it.)</p>
<p>But all the teams submitting conditional entries for 2010. Drop the conditions, adopt the proposed new rules and deal with it. Just like all F1 competitors always have. Those are the rules of the game&#8230;</p>
<p>Anything else is just &#8216;spoiled brat&#8217; mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John H</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260531</link>
		<dc:creator>John H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260531</guid>
		<description>Mosley the crazed dictator ruins my lunch break once again  : (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mosley the crazed dictator ruins my lunch break once again  : (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260521</link>
		<dc:creator>okay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260521</guid>
		<description>start our own series. im pretty sure red bull would be in that other series too if they don&#039;t sort out their problems regarding their energy products having cocaine on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>start our own series. im pretty sure red bull would be in that other series too if they don&#8217;t sort out their problems regarding their energy products having cocaine on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HounslowBusGarage</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260499</link>
		<dc:creator>HounslowBusGarage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260499</guid>
		<description>Aaaargh! &#039;entries&#039;, not &#039;entires&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaaargh! &#8216;entries&#8217;, not &#8216;entires&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HounslowBusGarage</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/06/03/f1-links-n-technology-readies-f1-squad/comment-page-1/#comment-260498</link>
		<dc:creator>HounslowBusGarage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=21347#comment-260498</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;However, maybe this move could go in their favour. If they are told that they don’t have a valid entry for 2010 by the FIA, how can FOM then sue them for breach of contract?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Hadn&#039;t really thought of that. 
But surely if the Teams have made conditional entires based on the FIA agreeing to certain counter-proposals, they are seeking to vary their original contract with the FIA. Whatever contract(s) the Teams have with FOM, must contain a clause stating that it&#039;s a subsidiary contract and dependent on the FIA contract. 
Otherwise, the FIA could cease F1 completely and unitlaterally and Bernie would then be able to sue all the teams for not racing in the FIA series, even though the FIA had abandoned it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>However, maybe this move could go in their favour. If they are told that they don’t have a valid entry for 2010 by the FIA, how can FOM then sue them for breach of contract?</p></blockquote>
<p>Hadn&#8217;t really thought of that.<br />
But surely if the Teams have made conditional entires based on the FIA agreeing to certain counter-proposals, they are seeking to vary their original contract with the FIA. Whatever contract(s) the Teams have with FOM, must contain a clause stating that it&#8217;s a subsidiary contract and dependent on the FIA contract.<br />
Otherwise, the FIA could cease F1 completely and unitlaterally and Bernie would then be able to sue all the teams for not racing in the FIA series, even though the FIA had abandoned it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 14/28 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/489 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 11:40:20 -->
