Renault’s ??2.3bn loss adds to financial gloom

Posted on | Author Keith Collantine

Following BMW’s abrupt decision to quit F1 speculation over which manufacturer might be next if rife. Suspicion tends to fall at the feet of Toyota and Renault.

There are many reasons to suspect the latter. Title sponsor ING is leaving the team at the end of the year, talisman driver Fernando Alonso is expected to switch to Ferrari, Nelson Piquet Jnr is clearly on his way out the door and Flavio Briatore is being touted as the next Bernie Ecclestone.

The FIA’s decision to bar the team from the next race can hardly help matters. And today, the parent company issued the latest round of gloomy financial results. To top it off, the company has already quit F1 twice before – in 1985 and 1997 – and a 2009 exit would establish a pattern.

Although the company’s press release has some encouraging things to say about its performance, it’s the headline loss of ??2.7bn (??2.3bn / $3.79bn) that makes you wonder if they can really afford to remain in F1.

Renault announces first-half year results

?? Net loss of ??2,712 million
?? Positive free cash flow of ??848 million
?? Group global market share stable at 3.7%

??We anticipated the crisis from July 2008 and made the first decisions necessary to weather it. Today, Renault is showing resilience, as illustrated by our significantly positive free cash flow. We are already preparing Renault for the post-crisis period with the mass marketing of zero-emission vehicles from 2011, the expansion of the entry-level range, consolidation of our presence in emerging markets and a drive to accelerate and expand synergies with Nissan,?? said Carlos Ghosn, Chairman and CEO of Renault.

Results affected by falling markets

With markets worldwide in free fall, including in emerging countries, Group revenues stood at ??15,991 million in first-half 2009, down 23.7% (21.5% excluding currency effects) on the same period in 2008.

Automobile?s revenue contribution was ??15,101 million on a consistent basis, down 24.2% on the first half of 2008. This figure masks a significant shift between the first and second quarters (-30.8% and -16.9% respectively). The general decline was caused by a sharp slowdown on virtually all Group markets, which resulted in a negative volume effect across all Regions.

?? Europe contributed to half of the revenue decline (-11.6 points), despite scrappage schemes in a number of countries. The product mix has been pulled downwards despite the good start made by the New M??gane and New Scenic. Several currencies, including sterling and the Polish zloty, also adversely affected revenues for Europe.
?? International operations were responsible for 6.8 points of the decline in revenue. Unfavourable currency effects, particularly on the Korean won, the Brazilian real, the Russian rouble and the Romanian lei, exacerbated the negative volume effect.
?? Sales of sub-systems and complete vehicles to partners made a negative contribution of 5.8 points. Sub-system sales were affected by the industry-wide reduction in inventories. Sales of light commercial vehicles were hit by the downturn in the European LCV market.

The revenue contribution from Sales Financing (RCI Banque) fell by 14.7% on the first half of 2008 to ??890 million.
The Group?s operating margin was a negative ??620 million in the first half of 2009, or -3.98% of revenues, compared with a positive ??865 million, or 4.1% of revenues, in the first half of 2008.

Automobile?s operating margin fell to a negative ??869 million, or -5.8% of revenue in first-half 2009, down by ??1,467 million on first-half 2008. This fall can be attributed to a negative exchange rate effect of ??155 million, a ??978 million fall in volumes that was directly linked to the slowdown on automotive markets, a negative mix/price and incentives impact of ??385 million and a ??176 million increase in the cost of raw materials. However, the company-wide cost-cutting policy began to take effect: purchasing costs fell ??90 million excluding raw materials, and G&A declined by ??106 million. At the same time, warranty-related costs continued to fall, dropping by ??110 million over the first half, reflecting continuous progress in product and service quality. Like revenue, operating margin showed a significant improvement between the first and second quarters.

RCI Banque demonstrated its resilience with an operating margin of ??249 million, equal to 28% of revenues. This performance can be attributed to good risk management and to real commercial momentum despite a 13% contraction in average performing loans outstanding.

The Group posted an operating loss of ??946 million in the first half of 2009, compared with income of ??845 million in the first half of 2008. Other operating income and expenses showed a net charge of ??326 million, made up primarily of a ??297 million impairment charge linked to the fact that expected volumes in the range have been revised downwards.

The net financial result showed a net charge of ??181 million, compared with net income of ??315 million in the first half of 2008, including a positive impact of ??343 million arising on the revaluation of redeemable shares. Excluding this item, the deterioration in the net financial result is the direct consequence of the increase in Group debt and the rise in interest expense.

The Group?s share in associated companies generated a loss of ??1,584 million, of which ??1,217 million for Nissan, ??196 million for AB Volvo and ??182 million for AvtoVAZ. The negative contribution of Nissan fell considerably in the second quarter to ??60 million, compared with ??1,151 million in the first quarter.

The Group recorded a net loss of ??2,712 million for the first half of 2009, compared with net income of ??1,581 million in the first half of 2008.

Group shareholders? equity stood at ??16,548 million at June 30, 2009.

Action plan on track with positive free cash flow and a reduction in net financial debt

The action plan put in place by Renault in July 2008 to weather the crisis is bringing results. The improvement in free cash flow gathered pace in the second quarter.

Automobile generated positive free cash flow of ??848 million in the first half of 2009, in advance on the action plan. This performance is attributable to cost-cutting, lower investment and a lower working capital requirement ?ǣ particularly in terms of inventory. R&D spend fell by 25% on first-half 2007, well ahead of the 15% reduction target initially set for the period 2007-2009. In light of this performance, the objective has been revised to a 20% reduction. Net tangible investments were down 10% on the first half of 2007. Vehicle inventory was cut by ??891 million compared with end-2008. The Group will also benefit from the successful launches of the M??gane family.

Automobile net financial debt declined by ??708 million to ??7,236 million at June 30, 2009, i.e. 43.7% of shareholders? equity (compared with 40.9% of shareholders? equity at December 31, 2008).

As at June 30, 2009, Automobile had improved its cash position relative to December 31, 2008 and had ??3.4 billion in cash and cash equivalents and ??4.2 billion in undrawn confirmed credit lines.

RCI Banque had available gross liquidity of ??5.4 billion, covering more than twice all outstanding commercial paper and certificates of deposit (??2.2 billion).

2009: Market

The implementation of tax incentives already had favourable effects on automotive markets and the Group in first-half 2009. The Group has revised its 2009 world market forecasts upward to more than 57 million units, or a decrease of 12% on 2008 compared with the initial forecast of 15% decrease. After a 13.7% decline in the first half, the European market is expected to improve in the second half-year to finish at -8% for the full year.

The Group will fully benefit in second-half 2009 from the launches in the first half of the year, notably the New M??gane, the two versions of New Scenic and Clio III phase 2. The product offensive will continue with the renewal of the SM3 and SM5 in South Korea.

2009: Outlook

In this context, the Group is confirming the 2009 objectives announced at the start of the year, namely a positive free cash flow and an increase in market share.
These objectives will be achieved by pursuing the action plans on further inventory reduction, managing receivables, limiting investments, reducing costs and by improving operational performance, compared with the first half-year.

More on Renault

13 comments on “Renault’s ??2.3bn loss adds to financial gloom”

  1. Terry Fabulous
    30th July 2009, 23:53

    It is hard to imagine that Renault will be on the grid in Melbourne. That is a staggering loss for a company which has always kept the purse strings fairly tight.

  2. Sush Meerkat
    31st July 2009, 1:56

    worse thing is is that Mosley will now say “see I told you so” and ramble on about budget cuts. But these guys would pull out regardless of budget cuts.

    1. Which is also what Max said, the belief that F1 would not survive without the manufacturers is a myth, the income may be less,and the developement slower, but as long as there is an internal combustion engine there will be motor racing….

      1. Only if there are sponsors or people with deep pockets prepared to shed money for their passion. If the image of F1 goes the way of Champcar/IRL/Indycars then they’re in big trouble. Without the continuation of the oft repeated refrained “the pinacle of motor sport” F1 could become a very pale image of itself. Many may harp back to the days of privateer Cosworth+Hewland runners but if you don’t like Champcar/IRL/Indycars why would you want that for F1?

  3. Yeah..looks like Renault will go.

    Thats a good thing though, because Fernando can go to Ferrari with no complications.

    I guess now that BMW is going, with Toyota and Renault eventually announcing..3 new spots for new teams. It would be really nice to see Audi in F1…but Quattros wont be allowed though.

    1. Considering how much Audi cut back back their LeMans operation, meaning their new car could not be tested as much as normal and as a result lost this year, I can’t imagine they’d join F1. Also, they seem to favour diesal racing too much for it.

    2. Well they have just signed the concorde agreement, so there is hope…..

  4. Andrew White
    31st July 2009, 13:27

    If they do go, will we see Briatore GP? Or will the FIA give Prodrive or Lola the place?

  5. Bigbadderboom
    31st July 2009, 13:42

    These figures may post a bleak landscape for Renault, but having read the whole article they seem fairly upbeat about the future. Renault really exploit their F1 participation in terms of marketing, and it may be felt that a withdrawel from competing will be a sign of weakness. I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion, sponsorship will not be too hard to find, and although BMW have called it a day, it would be horrible if Renault sold out to Flavio and then Flavio GP started scoring podiums in 2010, how much is Brawns success credited to Honda outside of F1 Fansites? Personally I think Renault will try to weather the storm.

    If rumours are correct, the new concorde will be signed later this week, so if it’s going to happen it will need to be soon.

  6. Bartholomew
    31st July 2009, 16:41

    Best wishes for the Renault F1 team in Enstone ! they have a lot of talent.
    Renault and the Terminator beat everyone twice to the DWC, including Ferrari and McLaren.

  7. HounslowBusGarage
    31st July 2009, 22:10

    If I was an institutional investor (such as a pension fund), I’d be looking for every opportunity for Renault to reverse its losses and return to profit. I would not care if, in the longer run (5 years +), things might rebound on me, I would be looking at the immediate future. And I would look to save the £200 million or so that the F1 programme cost last year.
    Being brutal, let’s pretend that on average, each vehicle sold returned 5,000 Euros to La Regie. That would mean that cutting out the F1 team at 200m Euros means means 40,000 less vehicles to sell.
    QED, and probably the same for Toyota as well.

  8. Let’s look at the positives here. When Honda walked away from F1 at the end of 2008 many predicted that we would lose more teams, that the sport would die even.
    Honda had been one of the biggest spenders in F1, spending anywhere between $250 million and $300 million each year. By leaving, they left behind a vast amount of highly trained technicians and facilities, which Ross Brawn promptly snapped up a bargain basement prices.
    The rest, as they say, is history. In a few short months Brawn Gp had achieved more than Honda F1 or BAR had achieved in their histories.
    As Frank Williams once stated about his team, ‘we exist to race’, can quite literally be applied to Brawn Gp. The do not exist to sell cars, or to market a brand like Red Bull, they are purely there to compete and win grands prix.
    The loss of BMW Sauber is a big blow, but alot depends on the next five months or so. BMW, like their Japanese rivals Honda, invested heavily in Formula One. Facilities that are out of this world, wind tunnels, and a whole army of technicians. The framework is there, and as with Honda F1, surely there must be interest from outside elements.
    Brawn GP in 2009 took on the biggest names in the car industry and promptly kicked their backsides in the first half of the season. On a budget the fraction of the size of teams like BMW Sauber and Renault, or Toyota for that sake.
    Deep pockets, as important as they are, do not bring a team success automatically. Personally, I think a team performs better when they know the money is not there to bail them out. A team that, as Toyota did, invested $3 billion between 2002 and 2008 runs the risk of falling into a comfort zone.
    They became so complacent, so used to the cash streaming in from Tokyo that they thought the green torent would never run dry. In many ways, they remind me of the banking industry, downright greedy!
    So, as for Renault I believe they will see how everything unfolds. Martin Brundle was quite right, the Valencia ban on the team does ‘stink’. It sends out the totally wrong message to a team tinkering with the idea to quit. In many ways, it offers the perfect excuse.
    Would Flavio Briatore take over the team if Renault did leave? It would not surprise me. He has been with the team since the Benetton days, and certainly has the cash to make a go at it. Flavio F1 alongside Team Thiessen at the 2010 Melbourne Gp. As far fetched as it sounds, after Brawn Gp’s amazing birth, anything is possible.

  9. BMW dropping out and Renault & Toyota expected to follow suit makes me re-evaluate FOTA’s threat to form a rival series. Would BMW have stayed given the original FIA budget cap of 50 Million? What would have become of an 8 team grid turned 5 team grid of a FOTA series if BMW, Toyota and Renault left it? Dare I say that perhaps the original Mosley FIA plan would have been best to keep these teams from pulling out? It seems that there really must have been a disconnect between Mario Theisen and his BMW corporate higher ups when you have the BMW Sauber team rejecting the given budget cap and then told by their bosses that they can’t fund them anymore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.