<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Renault face Singapore hearing today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrickl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-1/#comment-289024</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrickl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-289024</guid>
		<description>Ad #1) I simply claim that Massa would not have won that race due to his strategy and lack of pace to make it work. Raikkonen and even Kubica were too close behind.

There is no reason why Massa couldn&#039;t have done his usual &quot;panic when in traffic&quot; and hit a car while attempting some dumb overtake (like he actually did during that race) and lost every point still.

It&#039;s quite obvious though that if Hamilton had had to fight he would have taken a completely different strategy for Brazil though.

Ad #2) Look at Monza. Hamilton came back all the way from last spot on the grid. He stopped overtaking cars as soon as he was behind Massa.

So
A) it&#039;s not sure Massa would have even gotten points and
B) It&#039;s sure that Hamilton would have acted differently</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad #1) I simply claim that Massa would not have won that race due to his strategy and lack of pace to make it work. Raikkonen and even Kubica were too close behind.</p>
<p>There is no reason why Massa couldn&#8217;t have done his usual &#8220;panic when in traffic&#8221; and hit a car while attempting some dumb overtake (like he actually did during that race) and lost every point still.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite obvious though that if Hamilton had had to fight he would have taken a completely different strategy for Brazil though.</p>
<p>Ad #2) Look at Monza. Hamilton came back all the way from last spot on the grid. He stopped overtaking cars as soon as he was behind Massa.</p>
<p>So<br />
A) it&#8217;s not sure Massa would have even gotten points and<br />
B) It&#8217;s sure that Hamilton would have acted differently</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabi</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288852</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288852</guid>
		<description>...and if he was stripped then your opening another huge can of worms as Ferrari and Massa could rightfully contest that the Singapore GP to be taken away from the standings in it&#039;s entirety.

The basic fact is that Renault were just as much the victim as all of us (as PROVED by their actions since finding out), out of the three people who were involved two have been punished and one walked away. Your bedroom fantasy of getting Alonso thrown out isn&#039;t going to materialise so it&#039;s pointless making 30 comments a day about it. I don&#039;t like Hamilton (too smug) but I wasn&#039;t trying to create a stampede to take his head off when he lied did I?

And onto Renault both the racing team and the company have essentially been fined so really the punishment has almost fitted the crime here. Unfortunately until it is leaked as to how much Renault and RenaultF1 have to pay we will never know if the fines were justified or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and if he was stripped then your opening another huge can of worms as Ferrari and Massa could rightfully contest that the Singapore GP to be taken away from the standings in it&#8217;s entirety.</p>
<p>The basic fact is that Renault were just as much the victim as all of us (as PROVED by their actions since finding out), out of the three people who were involved two have been punished and one walked away. Your bedroom fantasy of getting Alonso thrown out isn&#8217;t going to materialise so it&#8217;s pointless making 30 comments a day about it. I don&#8217;t like Hamilton (too smug) but I wasn&#8217;t trying to create a stampede to take his head off when he lied did I?</p>
<p>And onto Renault both the racing team and the company have essentially been fined so really the punishment has almost fitted the crime here. Unfortunately until it is leaked as to how much Renault and RenaultF1 have to pay we will never know if the fines were justified or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeeMac</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288848</link>
		<dc:creator>GeeMac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288848</guid>
		<description>They kinda have been banned for life. Flav is out for good, it would be a brave team that would hire Symonds in 2014 or 2015 when his ban us over (despite his credentials), and who would hire NPJ now? He proved that he wasn&#039;t up to scratch in F1, and he will be forever haunted by this.

I&#039;m not saying I agreed with the council&#039;s decision, I&#039;m just saying that I guess I see where they are coming from. Kinda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They kinda have been banned for life. Flav is out for good, it would be a brave team that would hire Symonds in 2014 or 2015 when his ban us over (despite his credentials), and who would hire NPJ now? He proved that he wasn&#8217;t up to scratch in F1, and he will be forever haunted by this.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I agreed with the council&#8217;s decision, I&#8217;m just saying that I guess I see where they are coming from. Kinda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrickl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288842</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrickl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288842</guid>
		<description>Lol, I said the same before.

It really looked like he was supposed to hit the outside wall and &quot;missed&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, I said the same before.</p>
<p>It really looked like he was supposed to hit the outside wall and &#8220;missed&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288841</link>
		<dc:creator>S Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288841</guid>
		<description>Totally true!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally true!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrickl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-5/#comment-288836</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrickl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288836</guid>
		<description>You cannot seriously compare Hamilton and Ryan lying over letting Trulli past to Piquet crashing on purpose.

Hamilton had that position. Honest mistakes were made. Hamilton shouldn&#039;t have slowed down and Trulli should not have passed.

Piquet&#039;s premeditated action ruined a complete race. It handed Renault and Alonso a race win with a lot of points and money. A win to which they had no right at all.

Renault in reality got no punishment at all while Hamilton/McLaren was disqualified, lost the rightful podium position and TV money.

Utterly bizarre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You cannot seriously compare Hamilton and Ryan lying over letting Trulli past to Piquet crashing on purpose.</p>
<p>Hamilton had that position. Honest mistakes were made. Hamilton shouldn&#8217;t have slowed down and Trulli should not have passed.</p>
<p>Piquet&#8217;s premeditated action ruined a complete race. It handed Renault and Alonso a race win with a lot of points and money. A win to which they had no right at all.</p>
<p>Renault in reality got no punishment at all while Hamilton/McLaren was disqualified, lost the rightful podium position and TV money.</p>
<p>Utterly bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mp4-19b</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288835</link>
		<dc:creator>mp4-19b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288835</guid>
		<description>Not revealing Alonso&#039;s involvement serves a bigger purpose. It will sink this sport all together if they come up with the real truth. But if the FIA were calling themselves a honest organization, they would have certainly dug  deeper into this &amp; come out in the public and revealed everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not revealing Alonso&#8217;s involvement serves a bigger purpose. It will sink this sport all together if they come up with the real truth. But if the FIA were calling themselves a honest organization, they would have certainly dug  deeper into this &amp; come out in the public and revealed everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steph90</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288834</link>
		<dc:creator>steph90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288834</guid>
		<description>Renault should have lost constructors points and that win too. A few epople were involved but their were many suspicions at the time and Renault is made up of more than 3 men even if they were the only ones guilty.
Most importantly this whole system needs to be addressed; the justice dished out is never justice and the FIA knew about this since Brazil yet couldn&#039;t act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renault should have lost constructors points and that win too. A few epople were involved but their were many suspicions at the time and Renault is made up of more than 3 men even if they were the only ones guilty.<br />
Most importantly this whole system needs to be addressed; the justice dished out is never justice and the FIA knew about this since Brazil yet couldn&#8217;t act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288833</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288833</guid>
		<description>Thanks to everyone who posted information on the trial. Have set up a new poll here: &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;/2009/09/21/renault-escape-ban-for-crash-poll/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Renault escape ban for crash (Poll)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone who posted information on the trial. Have set up a new poll here: <a target="_blank" href="/2009/09/21/renault-escape-ban-for-crash-poll/" rel="nofollow">Renault escape ban for crash (Poll)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steph90</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/09/21/renault-face-singapore-hearing-today/comment-page-6/#comment-288831</link>
		<dc:creator>steph90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=25471#comment-288831</guid>
		<description>Geemac I can see where you are coming from, those involved had sort of limited the punishment they could get by walked away/immunity and it wasn&#039;t the full team involved though I think  with the 3 involved they should have all been banned for life, no immunity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geemac I can see where you are coming from, those involved had sort of limited the punishment they could get by walked away/immunity and it wasn&#8217;t the full team involved though I think  with the 3 involved they should have all been banned for life, no immunity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 13/37 queries in 0.050 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/507 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 10:26:52 -->
