The remarkable story of Brawn has generated many column inches since the team won both championships on Sunday.
But the flip side to the story is whether Honda’s decision to sell the team ten months ago must now be considered one of F1’s greatest blunders.
Earlier this year I asked a Brawn engineer whether he thought the team would have been as competitive if its cars were still using Honda engines instead of Mercedes.
The response came back firmly in the negative, and various disparaging remarks were made about the quality of Honda’s engines and their inability to remove the skin from rice pudding.
In one respect at least, the team’s transformation from Honda into Brawn may have done it more good than harm.
There’s also something to be said for the streamlining of the management process. No longer accountable to the parent company back in Japan, the racing team could now operate with autonomy. And it would be hard to find a better person to take up that responsibility than Ross Brawn.
On the other hand, the sudden change to Mercedes power forced Brawn into some tough compromises. One Brawn engineer told the BBC:
The chassis had the back six inches cut off to fit the engine in – the sort of thing you wouldn’t normally do even with a test car. And the gearbox was in the wrong place because the crank-centre height is different. There’s a massive amount of compromise in the cars.
Timing is also important. As Brawn missed the first two months of testing in January and February, no-one had any idea how quick they were, and no-one had time to respond.
Had Honda stayed, and the team stuck to a regular testing programme, its rivals would have known as early as January that the RA109 (not the BGP 001) was quick. It may have led them to develop double diffusers of their own more quickly, preventing Honda/Brawn from running away with all bar one of the first seven races, and changing the outcome of the championship.
Similarly if Honda had stayed there was a chance Bruno Senna would have taken Rubens Barrichello’s place. The loss of such an experienced driver could have hurt the team on the days when Jenson Button struggled to match Barrichello, particularly in the second half of the season.
How much better would the car have performed without the technical compromises? Was Honda’s departure a blessing in disguise?
There’s no clear answer to the question – it’s destined to become another of F1’s great conjectures to chew on with a few mates down the pub.
Do you think Honda missed out on a championship this year? Have your say below.
Button and Brawn, world champions
- Button?óÔé¼Ôäós championship win in pictures
- Button and Brawn celebrate (Pictures)
- Jenson Button is F1 world champion
- Brawn win 2009 F1 constructors?óÔé¼Ôäó title
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others