<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who should get the second Mercedes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:11:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-6/#comment-311076</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-311076</guid>
		<description>Pedro de la Rosa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pedro de la Rosa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pablo</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-6/#comment-308199</link>
		<dc:creator>pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-308199</guid>
		<description>how about robert kubica??
i vote for him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about robert kubica??<br />
i vote for him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artanis</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-6/#comment-308149</link>
		<dc:creator>Artanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-308149</guid>
		<description>GO !! KUBICA !! GO !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GO !! KUBICA !! GO !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Younger Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-5/#comment-307938</link>
		<dc:creator>Younger Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307938</guid>
		<description>what are you talking about Lewis is Commited to Mclaren 100% no matter what happens there are why he is in f1 thanks to them. you must have some stupid imagination.Yes it will be shock if he left Mclaren but its Impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what are you talking about Lewis is Commited to Mclaren 100% no matter what happens there are why he is in f1 thanks to them. you must have some stupid imagination.Yes it will be shock if he left Mclaren but its Impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Younger Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-6/#comment-307936</link>
		<dc:creator>Younger Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307936</guid>
		<description>i think Heikki Kovalainen should get the Second. Mercedes would probably be a Good Option for him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Heikki Kovalainen should get the Second. Mercedes would probably be a Good Option for him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-1/#comment-307865</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 13:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307865</guid>
		<description>Mercedes?  Picking up the leftovers of another team?  Heaven forbid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mercedes?  Picking up the leftovers of another team?  Heaven forbid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABG</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-3/#comment-307850</link>
		<dc:creator>ABG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307850</guid>
		<description>Haug wants Kimi End Of... And they have to show that the car is a winner and not like the car we saw towards the end of season 2009..

Its Kimi who has to decide now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haug wants Kimi End Of&#8230; And they have to show that the car is a winner and not like the car we saw towards the end of season 2009..</p>
<p>Its Kimi who has to decide now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABG</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-3/#comment-307848</link>
		<dc:creator>ABG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307848</guid>
		<description>So true ,, 

That guy is slimy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true ,, </p>
<p>That guy is slimy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABG</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-3/#comment-307847</link>
		<dc:creator>ABG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307847</guid>
		<description>You are assuming that Merc will be a top team ,,, No it will at best be a third best team similar to BMW so Nick wont be good enough even in a Merc to win WDC.

The only hope (by a long shot) is Kimi who is proven to be faster than anyone else - and if he is fired up against Ferrari and also gets a dose of luck (not his best friend)  - Well if Luck was with Kimi he would be WDC multiple times by now. 

Thats why I guess Kimi is the best bet (and its a bet) Merc shud take...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are assuming that Merc will be a top team ,,, No it will at best be a third best team similar to BMW so Nick wont be good enough even in a Merc to win WDC.</p>
<p>The only hope (by a long shot) is Kimi who is proven to be faster than anyone else &#8211; and if he is fired up against Ferrari and also gets a dose of luck (not his best friend)  &#8211; Well if Luck was with Kimi he would be WDC multiple times by now. </p>
<p>Thats why I guess Kimi is the best bet (and its a bet) Merc shud take&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sly</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/24/who-should-get-the-second-mercedes/comment-page-1/#comment-307795</link>
		<dc:creator>sly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27422#comment-307795</guid>
		<description>yeah right. He&#039;s this same type of diver like Button. 10 years nothing and now he&#039;s trying to get god car thats all. I don&#039;t think so he will be ever world champion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah right. He&#8217;s this same type of diver like Button. 10 years nothing and now he&#8217;s trying to get god car thats all. I don&#8217;t think so he will be ever world champion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 11/33 queries in 0.083 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 476/498 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 12:12:20 -->
