<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 F1 teams list sees Virgin replace Manor &#8211; and no Sauber or Toyota</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: QK</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-311423</link>
		<dc:creator>QK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-311423</guid>
		<description>hmm #22 is still vacant.. can someone, British, please occupy this slot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm #22 is still vacant.. can someone, British, please occupy this slot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cody</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-1/#comment-309845</link>
		<dc:creator>cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-309845</guid>
		<description>10 ford cosworth run engines wooooo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 ford cosworth run engines wooooo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteA</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-1/#comment-309289</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-309289</guid>
		<description>Bruno always has the number 21 on the Embratel caps he wears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruno always has the number 21 on the Embratel caps he wears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-309041</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-309041</guid>
		<description>In that case, it is cynical marketing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that case, it is cynical marketing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJA</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-308958</link>
		<dc:creator>PJA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308958</guid>
		<description>I think Williams are the only team to publically say they are opposed to a 14th team which is why they have received some criticism from some fans, but other teams are supposed to be against the idea also.

The arguments against a 14th team are that some tracks just don’t have the capacity for 14 teams for example garage space, and that financially F1 cannot support 14 teams with not enough sponsors etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Williams are the only team to publically say they are opposed to a 14th team which is why they have received some criticism from some fans, but other teams are supposed to be against the idea also.</p>
<p>The arguments against a 14th team are that some tracks just don’t have the capacity for 14 teams for example garage space, and that financially F1 cannot support 14 teams with not enough sponsors etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-308953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308953</guid>
		<description>Virgin has bought the rights to sell sponsor space on the Manor GP car as well as the naming rights. It means Virgin gets a whole lot of publicity and offsets most of the cost through advertising income. Much as Marlboro does with Ferrari.

As such, I doubt Virgin will remain on the Brawn/Mercedes in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virgin has bought the rights to sell sponsor space on the Manor GP car as well as the naming rights. It means Virgin gets a whole lot of publicity and offsets most of the cost through advertising income. Much as Marlboro does with Ferrari.</p>
<p>As such, I doubt Virgin will remain on the Brawn/Mercedes in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Peril</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-308928</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Peril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308928</guid>
		<description>I would be disappointed to not see Sauber/BMW on grid in some guise next year. Is there any reason at all why the grid can&#039;t be expanded to 14 teams? Seems to me with the natural attrition that will occur with the new teams over the first couple of teams anyway, building up the numbers now to account for that would make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be disappointed to not see Sauber/BMW on grid in some guise next year. Is there any reason at all why the grid can&#8217;t be expanded to 14 teams? Seems to me with the natural attrition that will occur with the new teams over the first couple of teams anyway, building up the numbers now to account for that would make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-308921</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308921</guid>
		<description>I think he wanted naming rights, however he hasn&#039;t offically stopped sponsering Brawn/Mercedes so Virgin may well sponser two teams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think he wanted naming rights, however he hasn&#8217;t offically stopped sponsering Brawn/Mercedes so Virgin may well sponser two teams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarred</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-2/#comment-308920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308920</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because BMW didn&#039;t sign the concorde agreement which meant they have no obligation to race in F1 in 2010. However Toyota did sign the concorde agreement,thus they do have an obligation to race, it&#039;s basically a contract, you break the contract, you get fined. It&#039;s basic legal process. So thats why BMW don&#039;t have to pay a fine and Toyota probably will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because BMW didn&#8217;t sign the concorde agreement which meant they have no obligation to race in F1 in 2010. However Toyota did sign the concorde agreement,thus they do have an obligation to race, it&#8217;s basically a contract, you break the contract, you get fined. It&#8217;s basic legal process. So thats why BMW don&#8217;t have to pay a fine and Toyota probably will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/11/30/2010-f1-teams-list-sees-virgin-replace-manor-and-no-sauber-or-toyota/comment-page-1/#comment-308908</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=27501#comment-308908</guid>
		<description>Number 1, Schuey won 5 of his with no.1  on the front 1 for alonso 1 for hakkinen and that just the last 10-12 years ish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 1, Schuey won 5 of his with no.1  on the front 1 for alonso 1 for hakkinen and that just the last 10-12 years ish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 14/42 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 478/518 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 14:15:55 -->
