Advertisement

Silverstone to use “more exciting” Moto GP track for 2010 F1 race (Pictures)

7 December 2009 by Keith Collantine
Silverstone 2010 F1 track layout

Silverstone 2010 F1 track layout

Silverstone intends to use a new track layout for the 2010 British Grand Prix.

The new circuit will include most of Silverstone’s signature high-speed bends such as Copse, Maggotts, Becketts and Stowe, but not the high-speed Bridge corner.

But a circuit spokesperson told F1 Fanatic he expected the new circuit to be “equally, if not more exciting” than the current version.

Other corners incluing Maggotts and Club will be revised to guarantee the safety of Moto GP riders – but F1 cars will continue to use the existing sections of track.

Moto GP’s governing body, the FIM, has already approved the circuit for use. The FIA will have to approve the new track for F1 cars.

The revised layout, first seen in February this year, replaces the current Abbey chicane with a similar pair of bends which turn in the opposite direction.

That sends the cars into the infield where they flick right before turning sharply left. They miss Bridge and Priory entirely, re-joining the current layout at a wider Brooklands corner.

Better for fans?

The changes should give fans a better view of the action. The stands at Becketts should offer a view of the new hairpin as well as the existing corner. There were also be new viewing areas for spectators.

If the new version is used and not thought successful, the old configuration could be used instead for later races. The British Racing Drivers’ Club has signed a deal to hold the race for the next 17 years.

The last significant change to Silverstone’s Grand Prix circuit was in 1997, when Copse, Brooklands and Luffield were re-profiled. A new pit and paddock complex is being planned for the 2011 race.

What do you think of the revised Silverstone circuit?

Silverstone 2010 F1 track configuration

2010 British Grand Prix

Share: | | |

Read more: 2010 F1 season | Articles in full | British Grand Prix | F1 Tracks | F1 races | Silverstone

76 responses to Silverstone to use “more exciting” Moto GP track for 2010 F1 race (Pictures)

  1. Bertie says:

    Looks worse to me. The abbey chicane and bridge are too great corners… shame.

    • TommyB says:

      Agree and there was a great general admission view where you could see the whole final section but now that’s all cut out

      • Adam says:

        Dumping Bridge corner? A flat out blind right hander? In my top 3 favourite corners in F1. Such a shame.

        And TommyB you are right. An awesome view. probably 5 meters from the track and it really shows off the true grip of the cars.

        Oh no im getting all emotional…

        • mp4-19b says:

          Agreed! Stupid decision by Damon Hill or whoever is proposing it. I did a poll a few months back on the top 5 corners/turns in f1 & I had placed the approach into Priory from Bridge in second spot. It is my favorite after Pouhon. You can make up tonnes of lost time up in that turn alone. Shame we’ll not see it next year :(

          Maybe you can vote for the Bridge corner here:-

          http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/forum/topic.php?id=718

  2. YeaMon says:

    THis is a wait and see thing from my point of view. Who knows, maybe this new section can produce some great action. If it doesn’t work, hopefully they’ll go back to the old configuration for the other 16 years.

  3. sato113 says:

    not too keen on having a new pit/paddock complex. I like the original, has nostalgic value. plus the current location has a better first corner at the start of the race.

    • I think the mechanics will be grateful for new pits. I remember talking to a BTCC mechanic who said Silverstone’s was the worst they went to…

    • James says:

      Half the reason there is a GP at Silverstone next year is because the pits and paddock need revamping…

      It needs doing, I’ve walked down the pit straight and the garages look pretty minute, and basic. An upgrade is far, far overdue.

    • Rich34Uk says:

      Sato113 one thing you have to remember is one of the only reasons there is a GP at Silverstone is the agreement to have a New PIt and Paddock complex, nostalgia has it’s place to a degree but it gets in the way sometimes due to Bernies controlling nature

  4. Chaz says:

    It’s a shame they will not have the high speed bridge corner as I really liked that section as well. The additional stands are probably to pay for the new deal just signed. It would be great if they produced an animated video of the new configuration…

  5. Pabs says:

    Looks good, but then even new tracks look good, but have dull racing…

    The designs of the cars need to allow for better overtaking

    • beneboy says:

      Don’t get me started on the car design issues…

      Let’s just say I couldn’t agree more :-)

      • Clay says:

        Interesting reading in the latest F1 Racing mag that a few team engineers have analysed where the overtaking takes place and they reckon that something like 90% of the whole season’s overtaking takes place at around 10 corners!

        Car design will play a major, if not THE major reason for a lack of overtaking, but circuit design would not be far behind. I won’t mind the changes IF the racing is better.

  6. Katy says:

    Hmm looks good. Have to wait and see what the racings like. If it doesn’t seem to add anything or make the racing worse are they able to use the old layout still?

  7. Rob R. says:

    It doesn’t really change anything.

    Like Patrick Head said in 2008, Silverstone is just another circuit ever since they added all the slow corners and chicanes. It used to be F1’s Indianapolis, back with the old classic layout, pre-1991.

    • Daffid says:

      Exactly. Or in the words of Nelson Piquet Snr. “What have you done to it!!??”
      Let’s go back to the old layout but with better run offs and barriers.

      • W154 says:

        30 Years ago they were lapping at an average speed of over 150 mph.If they are going to change it lets get back to the old layout and get back to balls out grand prix racing!

  8. HounslowBusGarage says:

    I think it looks quite interesting actually. Not sure about the precise orientation of the new grandstands on the infield though, the smallest one close to the new sharp left onto the National straight seems to be facing out at nothing in particular.
    I thought there were two bridges over the National straight; the new plan shows only one. Going to be a bit crowded I think. And is all the traffic to the new infield section supposed to go over the Hanger Straight bridge?

  9. stren says:

    I’m looking forward to those changes. Too bad bridge corner would be missing though. We’ll have to see if it gets approved; that runoff at the hairpin looks small.

  10. Chalky says:

    Well my wife just bought 2 early bird tickets for Abbey. So where we’ll end up sitting for the 2010 race, I’ve no idea? They can’t surely sell you a seat that won’t exist, and they only mentioned Pits Straight, Woodcote B and Becketts as potential seating that would change.

  11. Alex says:

    Who designed the new track?

  12. ajokay says:

    I think the track has been re-re-designed since the plans shown on this page.

    The newest map can be found here:

    http://www.silverstone.co.uk/track/circuit-maps/upcoming-developments/

    The arrowhead hairpin bit doubles back on itself now, and the straight before that has been turned in to a sweeping curve.

    Where is this new pit complex going to be placed? Is it on top of the old one, or one of the other straights? Something tells me it’s being put on the National Circuit’s back straight.

    • Robert McKay says:

      The new bit that’s on the Silverstone website reminds me a bit of the new first sector they stuck on the Nurburgring.

    • Ned Flanders says:

      Yeah I think you’re right, the layout on the pictures at the top has been changed since they first announced the plans.

      I’m not sure where the new pit straight will be either. It’s a shame they aren’t communicating that sort of thing better with the fans

      • Ned Flanders says:

        OK forget that, Keith said on the Forum that this is the real layout.

        It looks OK, but I think a lot depends on how fast the new Abbey chicane is. I’d love it if it was like one of the fast chicanes at Magny Cours, or the old Variante Alta at Imola.

  13. Zazeems says:

    Quite like it… although the new abbey chicane should be made a high speed sweeping right left, but with loads of runoff so the bikes can use it too.

  14. Zazeems says:

    @ajokay

    Yeah! The official Silverstone version is different, and worse, that section before Brooklands looks really mickey mouse. :(

    • Scribe says:

      ughh the official silverstone one looks rubbish, at least arrowhead had recognisable silverstone character, thats just another luffield.

  15. PJA says:

    I think it will be a case of wait and see before passing judegment.

    In this Autosport article it says

    if the Arena layout is used next year, the current start-finish line will be kept – with it only being moved when the new facilities are ready.

    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/80477

    I don’t know if I have missed it but does anyone know where the new start-finish line will be?

  16. DMW says:

    Two more spots to pass backmarkers: two braking zones into single-line corners that the cars will gobble up in 100 meters and less time than in takes to clear your throat—meaning that nothing can pass a car there short of a tank round.

    Is there not a thought for the loss of continuity? It’s great to have new tracks but they need to be counterbalanced with maintaining the history of the great tracks. It was bad enough when Silverstone was neutered with the current heap of chicanes so its time to stop monkeying around with the layout. Just after the sweeper at Bridge earns its place in the cannon of great and tricky corners at at great track, it’s replaced by another lame, fiddly Tilke-hairpin. The corner should be dubbed Langweilig Kurve, so he gets the picture.

  17. Robert McKay says:

    Either way they need to get on and make a decision, surely. They’ve lost a lot of time pfaffing with all this “are we getting it nonsense”, so they’ve not been able to start promoting it properly.

    And people want to know where they’re buying grandstand tickets for, corner-wise – there’s already someone above who is wondering this.

  18. Maciek says:

    The layout shown on the Silverstone site actually looks better I think, it’s just that their graphic is bad. The one here feels… Tilke-fied.

    Side note:I didn’t know there was a corner named Maggotts… hahaha.

  19. Spud says:

    Who did the design work on these new corners??

  20. *palmface*

    No no no no no….

  21. Zazeems says:

    @Robert McKay

    The new first section at the Nurburgring and pieces of track like it have a name…

    S**t

  22. David says:

    Well, it doesn’t look that bad.
    But we miss Abbey “S”, which is difficult and interesting, and the great Bridge-Priory sequence.
    I hope the new Abbey “S” is quick and technique enough, not a double low speed jump on the kerbs as, fer example, Monza’s one, and above all I hope the new hairpin is not a hairpin actually, but a quick bend as the old Beckett was.
    At the end I’d say it’s not that bad, even if I’m wondering if Silverstone actually needed some lay-out modifications.

  23. steve says:

    Great news….unless you happen to be associated with Donington. Well done Bernie, a really brave attempt to rebuild a great British track ruined by FOM greed…thank goodness Tom isn’t alive to see the mess you’ve left.

    • Robert McKay says:

      It might have helped if Donington had some pennies in the bank before signing the contract. They couldn’t have afforded a deal even half as good as Silverstone’s, which is itself pretty good by F1 market terms.

      Donington’s owners shot themselves in the foot.

  24. James says:

    I think I’m liking the new track. Obviously the number of laps in the race will be shorter as the lap length would appear to be longer. Also this development wont require much work either, as the second part (or the back straight) of the track is already there for the “national” or BTCC circuit.

    Looks like it’ll be a big test on brakes as well, long straights into tight, slow corners. That’ll be an interesting challenge for the drivers with a full tank to start.

    I’ll reserve judgement until we’ve had a bit of running on the track, but I think I like it.

  25. sulzerpower says:

    One of the reasons I hoped the race would stay at Silverstone was because the track has probably one of the best flow of corners on any F1 track, would a new hairpin after coming out of a chicane after Abbey really help overtaking?

  26. James_mc says:

    I’ll reserve judgement, assuming the Tilkinator hasn’t got his paws on this particular re-design…

  27. John Edwards says:

    I saw in Autosport there was a different variant of the moto GP circuit for the F1 cars proposed.

    The Abbey corner was much quicker and the arrowhead had become a tighter right followed by a longer left.

    Did anybody else see this??

  28. Prisoner Monkeys says:

    I like it. Everything from Abbey to Woodcote has been single-file chicanery until now. Hopefully this will make things a little more excitng.

  29. sato113 says:

    we must realise that the straight leading up to the new hairpin area and the straight leading away from it are both not new designs. they’re part of the existing international and national layouts.
    http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/mario71/images/Tracks/Silverstone.gif

    • Prisoner Monkeys says:

      That’s the beauty of it: Silverstone were able to get away with a major configuration change – arguably the largest they’ve ever seen – with a bare minimum off effort and expense.

  30. MGBracer says:

    Sadly, club racers have lost the cracking “International” circuit option, which incorporated Bridge.

    • The international course wasn’t getting as much use as it used to, which I understand is to do with noise restrictions and the extent to which it impinges on other activities happening at the circuit at the same time. Series like the BTCC have been using the national course instead.

    • sato113 says:

      yeah I used to play Toca 2 touring cars on it! was a great layout.

  31. Harvs says:

    the “new” corner from abbey looks like a melbourne park corner and the next corner after that looks like something from bahrain? does it mean longer lap times, thus less race laps?

    • Prisoner Monkeys says:

      It’s almost certainly going to produce a longer circuit length; the new section is twice as long as the route it bypasses. However, it’s also pretty quick. The old section was slow through Abbey and down into Priory and the like, but the new secton is made up of two long straights and some fast, flowing bends. While it’s likely to produce a longer lap time, it’s not going to be dramatically long. Maybe a second or two, but no more. It really depends on how the new configuration is built; there’s been a few different diagrams submitted.

  32. I like this new layout, and the new corner could surely be called Hill, Moss or Stewart? It;s about we named a corner after a motor racing legend.

    What is this I hear about the start/finish line being moved Keith?

    • Prisoner Monkeys says:

      The plan is for the Start/Finish Line and pits to be moved for 2011. They’ll be relocated from the front straght to the section between Club and the first corner of the new section.

      I believe the reasoning for this is that it will increase visiblity in the new “arena” section. As it stands, the current pit buildings and paddock block the view of the new section from the grandstands; by moving the Start/Finish Line to Club Corner and placing the new pits on the outside of the circuit, visibility will be improved. You’ll be able to see more of the cars, and for longer.

  33. GeeMac says:

    The loss of Bridge isn’t all that bad, it wasn’t much of a challenge in modern F1 cars. If they has messed with Copse, Maggots or Becketts, then I’d be angry!

    Doesn’t look too bad on the whole.

  34. wasiF1 says:

    I hope the racing improve.

  35. mp4-19b says:

    Totally Gay!! The bridge according to Kimi & Hamilton was one of the great challenges in F1.And its a blind right hander too. Its a tricky corner, where the driver is required to find a fine balance between braking & peddling on the gas.I just love that last sector of Silverstone. People can make up tonnes of lost time up there. It requires good mech grip & skilled driving to get the most out of that corner. All we’ll have now is a stupid hairpin half a kilometer after a straight. Just like the new Hockenheimring. Shame shame Damon Hill :0

    • John H says:

      Bridge is just a flat out corner with no braking until the corner is over. Are you sure Kimi and Hamilton said this?

    • Chaz says:

      @ mp4-19b – what does “totally gay” mean anyway and what does it have to do with this issue. Last I recall this is a F1 site. Perhaps some editing is in order please Keith…

    • Prisoner Monkeys says:

      The bridge according to Kimi & Hamilton was one of the great challenges in F1.And its a blind right hander too. Its a tricky corner, where the driver is required to find a fine balance between braking & peddling on the gas.

      It’s as weak as lite beer, and has been ever since Abbey was made into a chicane. The final sector at Silverstone is nothing more than chicanes and single-file sections; it’s worth sacrificing Bridge if it means rememdying that bigger problem.

  36. John H says:

    I think it will be good.

    I’ve always thought bridge was overrated, but that’s just my own view. At least it will be something different and probably interesting.

    It also means two sub-tracks are more easily configured now.

  37. ajokay says:

    Autosport have a nice new map of the new circuit…

    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/80477

    any idea where we can find a nice big version of this image anywhere?

  38. Icthyes says:

    Still needs a few tweaks, but definitely improved. Bridge is lost, but we’ve also lost two boring corners and a chicane for a slightly faster one and one tight corner.

    I hope they don’t move the start/finish line, just extending the current straight would be enough, but it if is to move I would hope it’s put where many minor formulae start, that is on the Hangar Straight.

  39. wasiF1 says:

    President of Formula One Management, Bernie Ecclestone, said: “I am pleased that we have reached an agreement with Silverstone for the retention of the British Grand Prix. This will ensure that Great Britain will remain on the Formula One calendar for many years to come, which is something I have personally always wanted to see happen. The team at Silverstone already knows how to organise a good event, so now everyone can look forward to next summer at Silverstone.”

    Did he really mean it?

  40. Zazeems says:

    Love the layout on autosport, abbey as a sweeping right left. I really hope thats the one they use; it’ll be exciting and offer more overtaking. Yay!

  41. Timtoo says:

    No tickets for Club corner? :( , best place for overtaking moves and no tickets?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!? (saw 2009 race from there, took 700 od photos, amazing!!

  42. Andrew says:

    I have just phoned Silverstone regarding the track layout as I wasn’t sure what tickets to buy and they informed me that the original track will be used for 2010 and the new track from 2011 onwards!

Leave a Reply

No swearing, insults, advertising or racial, sexual or similar discrimination allowed.

For more information see the F1Fanatic Comment Policy

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Has your comment not appeared? Try waiting a moment and then refresh the page. If it still doesn't appear and you've checked your comment meets the terms of our comment policy then contact F1Fanatic with the details of your comment so we can look into it.

If you wish to complain about a comment please contact the editor directly.