The new Mercedes Grand Prix team has suffered an early setback with the potential loss of a sponsorship deal worth ?é?ú81m (?óÔÇÜ?¼90m / $130m).
German financial newspaper Handelsblatt reports Brawn signed a three-year contract with Henkel in July. But Henkel now claims its head of sponsorship activities did not have the authority to approve the deal and is refusing to honour it.
Update: Official statement from Henkel below.
The former McLaren sponsor claims the employee, who has since been fired, arranged the deal using stolen Henkel stationery. Daimler and Henkel are now in dispute about whether the money should be paid.
The revelation comes amid increasing speculation about Michael Schumacher being brought into the team for 2010. But would the be able to pay his salary without this deal in place?
Update: Henkel have issued the following statement:
Fraudulent Formula 1 Sponsorship
Clear position in fraud case involving Willy Luchs and former Henkel employee
Brawn GP concluded Formula 1 sponsorship agreement with Dutch letterbox company ERE B.V.
Alleged guarantee by former Henkel employee issued without Henkel?óÔé¼Ôäós authorisation or knowledge
Brawn GP disregarded any due diligence
Henkel informed Daimler at the end of September that no sponsorship agreement existed with Brawn GP
Henkel filed court proceedings against Brawn GP in mid-November: no liability for fraudulent actions
Dusseldorf ?óÔé¼ÔÇ£ A fraud case, in which the Dusseldorf Prosecutor?óÔé¼Ôäós Office is investigating the previously convicted fraudster Willy Luchs and a former Henkel employee, has greater scope than originally believed.
Brawn GP has concluded a 3-year sponsorship agreement for 90 million euros with the Dutch letterbox company operated by the convicted fraudster Willy Luchs. A former Henkel employee is alleged to have entered into a Guarantee from Henkel to support such sponsorship agreement.
Additionally, it is totally unprecedented to believe that an employee at the 5th management level of a DAX-listed company would have been authorised to either negotiate or sign agreements of such magnitude and commercial profile without involving the company?óÔé¼Ôäós senior management, Finance, Marketing or Legal departments. The appropriate level of diligence does not appear to have been undertaken by Brawn GP as even a simple ?óÔé¼?ØGoogle?óÔé¼?Ø search would have revealed Willy Luchs?óÔé¼Ôäó criminal past.
Following an enquiry by Daimler on September 28, Henkel informed Daimler that a Formula 1 sponsorship agreement with Brawn GP neither exists nor was planned.
On October 28, after Henkel was informed by the Dusseldorf Prosecutor?óÔé¼Ôäós Office and the fraudulent acts became apparent, it immediately notified Daimler of the acts of Willy Luchs and the former Henkel employee. Henkel fully supports the Dusseldorf Prosecutor?óÔé¼Ôäós Office in their investigations.
On November 13, Brawn GP demanded payment from Henkel with a fixed deadline and with the threat of legal action. To safeguard its legitimate interests, on November 19 Henkel began court proceedings against Brawn GP in the Dusseldorf District Court in order for the Court to determine that there are no obligations whatsoever on Henkel on the basis of the existing documents. Henkel will not accept a fraudulent sponsorship arrangement with Brawn GP, based on clear and obvious fraudulent acts.