<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USF1 starts YouTube channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:25:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maestrointhesky</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-2/#comment-314671</link>
		<dc:creator>maestrointhesky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314671</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope their cars stay together better than the US tracks that have been used for F1!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope their cars stay together better than the US tracks that have been used for F1!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: his_majesty</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-314612</link>
		<dc:creator>his_majesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314612</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Chad Hurley is getting his &quot;side project&quot; and his work mixed up.  He doesn&#039;t even own youtube, since he sold it to google for 1.65 billion.  I guess we will just wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Chad Hurley is getting his &#8220;side project&#8221; and his work mixed up.  He doesn&#8217;t even own youtube, since he sold it to google for 1.65 billion.  I guess we will just wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: av-rated</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-314563</link>
		<dc:creator>av-rated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314563</guid>
		<description>I (a Californian) don&#039;t find offense in your opinions and think your comments unwittingly speak more to superficial cultural differences in approach and desired appearances than anything else. 

Like you Ned, I expect USF1 to struggle mightily as any new team would (and should) if the stalwarts of the sport are doing their jobs.  

However, unlike you, their struggles will not be because of their lack of nifty shop uniforms or the fact they&#039;re housed in a 40k sq. foot dry-walled facilty (versus a glass walled uber-shop overlooking a man made lake).  

Rather, it&#039;s much more simple.  That is, COMMON SENSE tells us they&#039;ll struggle as a newbie start-up in an immensely competitive business/sport with an enormously steep technological learning curve.  It&#039;s how they respond to challenges as the season progresses and beyond that will be the true measure of their success or failure.  Inanimate uniforms and year one garage facilities will have very little to do with it..that much is certain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I (a Californian) don&#8217;t find offense in your opinions and think your comments unwittingly speak more to superficial cultural differences in approach and desired appearances than anything else. </p>
<p>Like you Ned, I expect USF1 to struggle mightily as any new team would (and should) if the stalwarts of the sport are doing their jobs.  </p>
<p>However, unlike you, their struggles will not be because of their lack of nifty shop uniforms or the fact they&#8217;re housed in a 40k sq. foot dry-walled facilty (versus a glass walled uber-shop overlooking a man made lake).  </p>
<p>Rather, it&#8217;s much more simple.  That is, COMMON SENSE tells us they&#8217;ll struggle as a newbie start-up in an immensely competitive business/sport with an enormously steep technological learning curve.  It&#8217;s how they respond to challenges as the season progresses and beyond that will be the true measure of their success or failure.  Inanimate uniforms and year one garage facilities will have very little to do with it..that much is certain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F1Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-2/#comment-314439</link>
		<dc:creator>F1Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314439</guid>
		<description>admittedly, the one thing i would change is the lack of uniforms. i don&#039;t expect that to impact the final product, but at this point presentation is everything. if it were me, i would have invested a few hundred dollars on some USF1 t-shirts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>admittedly, the one thing i would change is the lack of uniforms. i don&#8217;t expect that to impact the final product, but at this point presentation is everything. if it were me, i would have invested a few hundred dollars on some USF1 t-shirts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PinballLes</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-314308</link>
		<dc:creator>PinballLes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314308</guid>
		<description>Yeah, no, McLaren have the big massive impressive building because they have existed as a team for about 47 years. When Bruce McLaren started the team in 1963 that they didn&#039;t have anything like the McLaren Technology Centre. 

The McLaren Technology Centre was only finished in 2003, 40 years after the team was first started, and cost 300 million pounds to build. 

Why would a new team spend 300 million pounds on a headquarters, when that 300 million pounds could be used on something more worthwhile, like I dunno, designing a car that is fast. Maybe in 40 years, USF1, if successful might have an equally as impressive headquarters. 

Finally I&#039;m not sure if you understand how design engineering work, but the computers are just a tool, like a hammer is to carpenter. It&#039;s the people operating the tool that determine whether the end result is any good. In the right hands a $50 hammer can produce results equally as good as $100 hammer. Same goes with engineers using computers and software packages. To me it sounds like USF1 might just know how to effectively use the tools that they have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, no, McLaren have the big massive impressive building because they have existed as a team for about 47 years. When Bruce McLaren started the team in 1963 that they didn&#8217;t have anything like the McLaren Technology Centre. </p>
<p>The McLaren Technology Centre was only finished in 2003, 40 years after the team was first started, and cost 300 million pounds to build. </p>
<p>Why would a new team spend 300 million pounds on a headquarters, when that 300 million pounds could be used on something more worthwhile, like I dunno, designing a car that is fast. Maybe in 40 years, USF1, if successful might have an equally as impressive headquarters. </p>
<p>Finally I&#8217;m not sure if you understand how design engineering work, but the computers are just a tool, like a hammer is to carpenter. It&#8217;s the people operating the tool that determine whether the end result is any good. In the right hands a $50 hammer can produce results equally as good as $100 hammer. Same goes with engineers using computers and software packages. To me it sounds like USF1 might just know how to effectively use the tools that they have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phi</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-2/#comment-314290</link>
		<dc:creator>Phi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 00:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314290</guid>
		<description>USF1 website is up now:

http://www.usgpe.com/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USF1 website is up now:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.usgpe.com/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usgpe.com/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedel to the Vettel</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-314271</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedel to the Vettel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314271</guid>
		<description>yer it does lol thats why they have the building in the first place because they are smart lol. And thats why they have bigger, faster and more accurate computers then USF1 does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yer it does lol thats why they have the building in the first place because they are smart lol. And thats why they have bigger, faster and more accurate computers then USF1 does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsob</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-2/#comment-314247</link>
		<dc:creator>dsob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314247</guid>
		<description>Between Ken Anderson &amp; Peter Windsor there is a lot of business acumen and a lot of Formula 1 experience. I&#039;m sanguine about them getting the car to the grid. Heck, it might even start.

As others have said, their approach to car building, or even housing/operating the team, may be different from the classical F1 model. But Americans tend to think that form follows function, and to build a car that runs on petrol and motor oil, they tend to think more in terms of cinder block walls and concrete floors for their garages, rather than glass and porcelain &amp; alabaster(though I admit the Macca digs are quite pretty).

Their facility is, I&#039;m sure, smaller than Macca&#039;s, but as GMan &amp; others so rightly point out, the area in which they have located is rife with automotive specialty companies &amp; facilities. (As well as some very nice lakes.) The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windshearinc.com/services/services.htm#Services&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Windshear wind tunnel facility&lt;/a&gt;, for those of you who don&#039;t know, is one of the premier facilities in the world, the only rolling-road wind tunnel in the Americas, and one of only three such facilities in the world. 

I think US-F1 is in good hands, and I&#039;ll trust Ken and Peter to get it to the grid. And I&#039;m sure Peter will remind the boys to not scratch their bums or pick their noses in the paddock--well, at least not while the cameras are on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between Ken Anderson &amp; Peter Windsor there is a lot of business acumen and a lot of Formula 1 experience. I&#8217;m sanguine about them getting the car to the grid. Heck, it might even start.</p>
<p>As others have said, their approach to car building, or even housing/operating the team, may be different from the classical F1 model. But Americans tend to think that form follows function, and to build a car that runs on petrol and motor oil, they tend to think more in terms of cinder block walls and concrete floors for their garages, rather than glass and porcelain &amp; alabaster(though I admit the Macca digs are quite pretty).</p>
<p>Their facility is, I&#8217;m sure, smaller than Macca&#8217;s, but as GMan &amp; others so rightly point out, the area in which they have located is rife with automotive specialty companies &amp; facilities. (As well as some very nice lakes.) The <a href="http://www.windshearinc.com/services/services.htm#Services" rel="nofollow">Windshear wind tunnel facility</a>, for those of you who don&#8217;t know, is one of the premier facilities in the world, the only rolling-road wind tunnel in the Americas, and one of only three such facilities in the world. </p>
<p>I think US-F1 is in good hands, and I&#8217;ll trust Ken and Peter to get it to the grid. And I&#8217;m sure Peter will remind the boys to not scratch their bums or pick their noses in the paddock&#8211;well, at least not while the cameras are on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pengo</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-314213</link>
		<dc:creator>Pengo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314213</guid>
		<description>Good point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xanathos</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2009/12/24/usf1-starts-youtube-channel/comment-page-2/#comment-314170</link>
		<dc:creator>Xanathos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28001#comment-314170</guid>
		<description>Good to see something from USF1 - finally. Their factory looks decent and they are definetely builing F1 cars there. Of course, this is somewhat smaller than what you see from other teams, but don&#039;t forget that they are a new team. On their Website they are also saying where they are doing wind tunnel testing etc. (http://www.usgpe.com/blog.html) - I like the idea of putting the actual car in a full-scale wind tunnel next door - from a cost-cutting perspective this makes sense. Now I&#039;m thinking that we&#039;ll actually see 26 cars next year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see something from USF1 &#8211; finally. Their factory looks decent and they are definetely builing F1 cars there. Of course, this is somewhat smaller than what you see from other teams, but don&#8217;t forget that they are a new team. On their Website they are also saying where they are doing wind tunnel testing etc. (<a href="http://www.usgpe.com/blog.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usgpe.com/blog.html</a>) &#8211; I like the idea of putting the actual car in a full-scale wind tunnel next door &#8211; from a cost-cutting perspective this makes sense. Now I&#8217;m thinking that we&#8217;ll actually see 26 cars next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 13/30 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 479/495 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 09:54:24 -->
