<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F1 Fanatic round-up: 6/1/10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:32:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajokay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316439</link>
		<dc:creator>ajokay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316439</guid>
		<description>But they&#039;re not BMW... they&#039;re Sauber with a Ferrari. Sauber were famous before BMW came along, and had big money and long-term deals with Petronas, Red Bull and Credit Suisse, I don&#039;t see why they would end up being regarded as one of the new teams when they have approaching 20 years of F1 history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they&#8217;re not BMW&#8230; they&#8217;re Sauber with a Ferrari. Sauber were famous before BMW came along, and had big money and long-term deals with Petronas, Red Bull and Credit Suisse, I don&#8217;t see why they would end up being regarded as one of the new teams when they have approaching 20 years of F1 history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316400</link>
		<dc:creator>James Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316400</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t quite understand why it says even Renault are doing the same. I thought they had accepted the guilt &amp; moved on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand why it says even Renault are doing the same. I thought they had accepted the guilt &amp; moved on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316394</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316394</guid>
		<description>Depends how you look at it all though - how could they have given Flavio immunity when he was the one they were gunning for?

NONE of them should have been granted immunity, and the fact that of the 2 out of 3 perpetrators were given immunity, it doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist to ascertain who the FIA wanted to go down for it. Unbelievable tactics from Max &amp; the FIA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends how you look at it all though &#8211; how could they have given Flavio immunity when he was the one they were gunning for?</p>
<p>NONE of them should have been granted immunity, and the fact that of the 2 out of 3 perpetrators were given immunity, it doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to ascertain who the FIA wanted to go down for it. Unbelievable tactics from Max &amp; the FIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanyima</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316380</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanyima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316380</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Really does make me giggle how they’re still calling themselves BMW. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

ajokay, that&#039;s the power of name recognition. Sauber don&#039;t wanna come in and be regarded as &quot;one of the new small teams&quot;. Maintaining the BMW name gives them some sort of leverage in identifying with the big boys. Certainly a marketing tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Really does make me giggle how they’re still calling themselves BMW. </p></blockquote>
<p>ajokay, that&#8217;s the power of name recognition. Sauber don&#8217;t wanna come in and be regarded as &#8220;one of the new small teams&#8221;. Maintaining the BMW name gives them some sort of leverage in identifying with the big boys. Certainly a marketing tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thestig84</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316369</link>
		<dc:creator>thestig84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316369</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Seems everyone is leaving their car launches a little later than usual this year. I wonder why?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because there is no testing allow till Feb.  Gives them longe to work on the car.  No point rushing it fo Jan 8th when it will just sit there till Feb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Seems everyone is leaving their car launches a little later than usual this year. I wonder why?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because there is no testing allow till Feb.  Gives them longe to work on the car.  No point rushing it fo Jan 8th when it will just sit there till Feb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316358</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316358</guid>
		<description>Briatore considering legal action against Piquet: http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE6050LH20100106</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Briatore considering legal action against Piquet: <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE6050LH20100106" rel="nofollow">http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE6050LH20100106</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul F</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316356</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316356</guid>
		<description>I think that&#039;s a slight over reaction. 

Ultimately, Piquet is a big boy - if he didn&#039;t want to crash then he shouldn&#039;t have.  I understand that he was put under pressure, and he felt there would have been consequences if he didn&#039;t comply, but really he should have kept his integrity intact and said no.  

Renault&#039;s crash in Singapore was not the first instance of cheating in F1, nor was it the last - anyone who thinks this sport we follow is squeeky clean is pretty catastrophically misguided in my opinion. 

These guys are ferociously competitive - not only having the need to perform for their own personal desires, but also those of sponsors etc - and to think that they won&#039;t do whatever is absolutely necessary to achieve results stops short of what I would call a &quot;sense of reality&quot;.

If you really think this is &lt;strong&gt;&quot;the worst of the worst&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;, that Flav is a &lt;strong&gt;&quot;scumbag&quot;&lt;/strong&gt; because of it, and that anyone &lt;strong&gt;&quot;even remotely involved doesn’t deserve to go near a race car as long as they live&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;, I suggest you take a little look around yourself at the world in which we live, and re-evaluate your sense of morality!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#8217;s a slight over reaction. </p>
<p>Ultimately, Piquet is a big boy &#8211; if he didn&#8217;t want to crash then he shouldn&#8217;t have.  I understand that he was put under pressure, and he felt there would have been consequences if he didn&#8217;t comply, but really he should have kept his integrity intact and said no.  </p>
<p>Renault&#8217;s crash in Singapore was not the first instance of cheating in F1, nor was it the last &#8211; anyone who thinks this sport we follow is squeeky clean is pretty catastrophically misguided in my opinion. </p>
<p>These guys are ferociously competitive &#8211; not only having the need to perform for their own personal desires, but also those of sponsors etc &#8211; and to think that they won&#8217;t do whatever is absolutely necessary to achieve results stops short of what I would call a &#8220;sense of reality&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you really think this is <strong>&#8220;the worst of the worst&#8221;</strong>, that Flav is a <strong>&#8220;scumbag&#8221;</strong> because of it, and that anyone <strong>&#8220;even remotely involved doesn’t deserve to go near a race car as long as they live&#8221;</strong>, I suggest you take a little look around yourself at the world in which we live, and re-evaluate your sense of morality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajokay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316345</link>
		<dc:creator>ajokay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316345</guid>
		<description>Really does make me giggle how they&#039;re still calling themselves BMW. It&#039;s like Mercedes still being called Honda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really does make me giggle how they&#8217;re still calling themselves BMW. It&#8217;s like Mercedes still being called Honda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Collantine</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316344</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316344</guid>
		<description>And BMW makes two: &lt;a href=&quot;/2010/01/06/bmw-to-reveal-2010-f1-car-on-january-31st/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BMW to reveal 2010 F1 car on January 31st&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And BMW makes two: <a href="/2010/01/06/bmw-to-reveal-2010-f1-car-on-january-31st/" rel="nofollow">BMW to reveal 2010 F1 car on January 31st</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajokay</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/06/f1-fanatic-round-up-6110/comment-page-1/#comment-316339</link>
		<dc:creator>ajokay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 10:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=28142#comment-316339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...Ferrari, who revealed their F2008 two years ago today.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that so? Seems everyone is leaving their car launches a little later than usual this year. I wonder why? Is Mercedes the only team so far to have given a date for their car launch (1st Feb)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;Ferrari, who revealed their F2008 two years ago today.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that so? Seems everyone is leaving their car launches a little later than usual this year. I wonder why? Is Mercedes the only team so far to have given a date for their car launch (1st Feb)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 18/30 queries in 0.100 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 484/500 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 08:38:56 -->
