Advertisement

McLaren MP4-25 launch pictures

29 January 2010 by Keith Collantine
Button and Hamilton reveal the McLaren-Mercedes MP4-25

Button and Hamilton reveal the McLaren-Mercedes MP4-25

McLaren has launched its 2010 challenger, the MP4-25.

The MP4-25 was officially presented at the headquarters of title sponsor Vodafone, with Lewis Hamilton joined by new team mate Jenson Button.

Some images of the MP4-25 leaked online ahead of its official launch. Here are studio photographs of the car and pictures from the launch.

McLaren-Mercedes MP4-25 launch

McLaren MP4-25 launch pictures

Images (C) www.mclaren.com

Share: | | |

Read more: 2010 F1 season | Articles in full | F1 Pictures | F1 teams (active) | McLaren

140 responses to McLaren MP4-25 launch pictures

  1. grant says:

    I think it will blow ferrari away

    • CounterStrike says:

      No it won’t. It’ll annihilate them ;)

      • K says:

        Here we go….

        • Gilly says:

          K, please don’t get upset about people ridicularizing Ferrari here. I’ve given up a while ago (back when mp4-19b was here), and my quality of life improved =P

          No matter what you say, they won’t listen, anyway, and Ferrari is the devil while McLaren is the Almighty God, even when Ferrari is advocating changes that would favour McLaren too…

          • Hammad says:

            I’m sure there’s gonna be a lot of Mercedes and Schuey bashing as well… especially if they do well

          • K says:

            I’m not upset, I just find it funny that people are so quick to say these things.

            Ferrari is probably my favourite team but I’m not a hardcore Tifosi, I don’t really mind if they loose.

          • Rubel_Frm_BD says:

            Hey i am totally agree with u. They called Ferrari a cheat but they forget that it is Mclaren who stole the Ferrari’s design, did chetting in races (hamilton let passes Trulli) even have some penalti for cheating and fined 100 million.

            Ferrari’s design is working very well and its is a very strong car

      • Vince says:

        It looks like an RB5/Brawn Hybrid.
        The Brawn sidepods, Redbull nose and
        engine cover, and Ferrari’s rear wing!
        They should have tried to continue to evolve their own car instead of copying others.
        I think they got it wrong anyway, it looks too
        heavy in the mid-section.

        • thestig84 says:

          Nothing at all like the brawn side pods. They are square for christs sake!! I cant see how this is a copy of anything tbh. Mclaren should have asked you….they spent all the time and money and you could have told them it is wrong by just looking at a few pictures!

          • CounterStrike says:

            Stig, I have to admit that ice car you made beats all competition mate. :) Really marvelous engine cover design. Reminded my of the 89,90,91 Mclaren engine covers.

            Could you post a link to the pic? The forum’s dead at the moment.

          • CounterStrike says:

            And I bet you could have even made this complex Shark fin!

          • Vince says:

            Sorry Mate, I didn’t mean to get under your skin, I was just trying to prove a point to the previous posters by repeating some of the ridiculous comments made about a red car yesterday. Of course those comments weren’t ridiculous though they were the truth, and
            mine are ridiculous.

        • AP says:

          It looks craptastic!

          It would win the award of ugliest car I have seen in a while….

    • Bartholomew says:

      I think that McLaren has launched a dummy car with the fin covering the engine, so that Ferrari says “my gosh, this is what we have not thought about” and they start working on their version of it.
      When Ferrari gets to Bahrain they will find that their car is 1 second a lap slower because of the fin. This is something that McLaren already knew this past month of October, after computer simulations.
      McLaren will unveil a new aero package in Bahrain, with a conventional engine cover among other things, and be really fast.

      Ron has sharpened his wit after years of dealing with Bernie and Max.
      By the time Ferrari finds out about the trick, it will be June

      • Actually at one point Hamilton said they don’t always present the same chassis at the launch they take to test – but on this occasion they did. The same car that was on the stage yesterday will be pounding around Valencia on Monday.

      • Rog says:

        that comment just about sums up the views on this site. I doubt any of you have even been to a race let alone seen a n F1 car in the flesh.

        ‘Ron’, my friend, has nothing to do with F1 and hasn’t for the past two years.

        All we need to do now is keep our ridicules comments to ourselves and watch the red cars win the championship again.

        Remember, It is better to remain quiet and be thought of as a fool that to open your mouths and have it confirmed

  2. CounterStrike says:

    Funny how the shark fin bisects Voda Fone on the rear wing. They could have done a better job of the front nosecone section.

    Thanx for the pics Keith.

    • Scribe says:

      Huh, could you clarify that statement.

      From below the front wing it looks much less agressive then it does from the top.

      So radical top nose, tried and tested undernose? What would you have them do?

    • Brad D says:

      If that fin is attached to the wing like i think it is it’s going to significantly reduce the amount of airflow over the wing.

  3. Jim N says:

    What an incredible looking car. If it goes as well as it looks it will be unbeatable!

  4. UnicornF1 says:

    Great looking car!!!

  5. Gusto says:

    Have you noticed the inner wheel fairing with brake duct an winglet, is this on any other car?

  6. Gusto says:

    And the no photos rear end

  7. Gusto says:

    the rear fin is more like a tadpole tail and less like a drywall partion between airflows

  8. commodore says:

    Hey Keith, any comparo pics bet’n this, the ferrari and the mclaren 09 ???would help .. thanks.

  9. grant says:

    do you guys think ferrari is sandbagging by saying they working on b version or you guys seriously think they have crap coming to them? is 2009 the downfall for ferrari for years to come. the turning point?

    • CounterStrike says:

      I don’t think they were sandbagging. Every one last year were banging about McLaren doing the same, but see what they turned out to be, a pig I would say.

      I think ferrari are well past their glory days.

      Welcome back the dark years of 1979-2000.

    • Toby Bushby says:

      If Ferrari built a b-spec, wouldn’t that be circumventing the resource restriction agreement? Surely it would?!

      Would they shake it down at a Friday practice like Minardi did, or Campos plan to (allegedly). No is the answer. Not going to update it at all during the season, are you? Yeah right.

      In my mind, if Ferrari build a b-spec in this “era”, they’re betraying FOTA’s agreement on resources, and the saddest part is that it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if they did. They tend to play buddies for as long as it suits them before heading to the piggy bank, (or Ross’ old drinking buddy, for example) in my opinion. The minute they’re in deep doodoo, they jump ship to protect the brand. That’s what they do, and stuff the rest, though they’re certainly not Robinson Crusoe in that department – making this comment relevant to the thread, if you catch my drift.

      Frankly, I don’t like the look of this McLaren (much less than the Ferrari, in fact). I’ll even make a statement of opinion (and only opinion) – it actually looks slow….

  10. JV says:

    It looks like the hungry beast.
    Far better than ferrari.
    What’s abt diffuser?

  11. spawinte says:

    That really is a breathtaking car

  12. Bartholomew says:

    Holy Moses ! spectacular — the best looking Mclaren ever.
    The unique vision of Ron taken forward as a sleek elegant spaceship.

  13. kaushal says:

    Even though MP4-25 looks good, but Ferrari’s 2010 is stunning.

    [Apologies to all UK fans who are supporting all U.K based team- McLaren]

  14. Kutigz says:

    Guys..this is indeed a glaring radical design – a ‘change’ phenomenon!
    In my own candid opinion, the designers had one thing in mind right from the drawing board – FLY…baby FLY!!!

  15. JooE says:

    the title is ours baby

  16. James says:

    Interesting to see that the diffuser has been covered up on the Mclaren.

  17. GeeMac says:

    It looks spectacular!

  18. Zeke says:

    Have they lengthened the wheelbase compared to the 09 car.

  19. ajokay says:

    Button’s gone back to his Union Flag helmet colours:

    http://f1.gpupdate.net/en/photolarge.php?photoID=144162&catID=4673

    Excellent. Looks smart.

  20. Paul Steele says:

    Could you do a side by side comparison of the 2009 MclAren and the new one and also a comparison between the 2010 Mclaren and 2010 Ferrari as they seem so different.

    Thanks

  21. GeeMac says:

    I’m surprised they have managed to sculpt the sidepods so much, I expected them to be a lot bulkier.

  22. Luke H says:

    Where’s the Santander logos? Interesting

  23. Mouse_Nightshirt says:

    The front nosecone sides are similar to the renault last year but they’ve hidden the horrif looking bits with cunning colouring…

  24. dave says:

    THOSE EXHAUSTS WILL HEAT THE TYRES UP A TREAT ON THE WARM UP LAP!! SUPER STARTS HERE WE COOOOME!!! :-) ;-):-);-):-)

  25. Alex says:

    Stupid shark fins. Hated those ever since the first teams used them.

  26. Gusto says:

    Was glad to see Jenson almost clean shaved, Formula One is no place for beards, it looks so unprofesional.

    • GeeMac says:

      It’s McLaren policy to be clean shaven… that’s why DC went all stubbly when he went to Red Bull.

      • Gusto says:

        I remember J Vill with a beard, it just aint right lol

        • gabal says:

          I think quite opposite – corporate culture is ruining Formula 1. F1 needs more charachters like James Hunt, not the perfect manequins for corporations.

          And while we are at beards I don’t think Heidfeld has shaven since he left Williams ;)

  27. TommyB says:

    I found the whole event extremely embarrassing. The questions to the drivers were good but Button and Hamilton kept looking at each other wondering if they were allowed to answer them. Cringe worthy.

    I don’t like the car either I think the Ferrari is much nicer but I do hope the car is fast as I want Lewis to do well.

    • Gusto says:

      I think Ferrari will struggle on the airflow over the monocoque(?).Long nose turbulence over said nose

      The car doesnt look as organic as the Mclaren….. The Mclaren looks like a…..Fish….. the Ferrari looks like…… a brick……. but they describe the Shuttle as the flying brick… it works but its not pretty.

  28. sainaa says:

    This is the ugggliest McLaren ever.

  29. John H says:

    Strange aero just underneath the nose going on there. Is it an air intake?

    • Neil D says:

      Looks like an extra central element splits the air flow, probably directing it to the side pods. That’s a clever idea and something the Ferrari doesn’t have. This appears to be a much more radical design all round.

  30. Charlie says:

    I remember last year when everyone was saying the 09 car looked beautiful … until they put it on a track lol…

    Beauty does not make speed. Good engineering does.

  31. PJA says:

    First impressions are that it would great if it wasn’t for the shark fin/anvil engine cover.

  32. halifaxf1fan says:

    Nice looking car.

    Is this a Lewis Hamilton design? Has Mclaren released the tally of how many points of downforce Lewis found on this car?

  33. gabal says:

    McLaren always looks stunning on launches while the surroundings around it are bright. On track it looks a lot darker boring gray.

    It would have looked fine it if wasn’t for the barn door they attached to the engine cover. I wonder how will it perform in the crosswind.

  34. Steven says:

    Jenson has reverted back to his original colour scheme for his helmet, no sign of the Monster Energy drink logo.

    http://www.autosport.com/gallery/photo.php/id/1324303

  35. Salut Gilles says:

    No RB5 nose? That’s a first.

    Maybe it’s there a little, but it’s hard to tell.

  36. CounterStrike says:

    Was Norbert Haug present at the launch?

    • Scribe says:

      Loosing his voice apparently.

      May have been a diplomatic illness but his voice was going at the Mercedes launch.

      • CounterStrike says:

        He’s actually a very very distant relative of mine :) But I’ve never gotten a chance to meet up.

        Whitmarsh was there at Stuttgart, wasn’t he? Such a nice gesture from Martin.

        Shame that the Mercedes personnel have completely ignored the unveiling.

        After all McLaren still caries their LOGOS.
        Irony here is that the Mercedes-Benz logos on the McLaren, both on the nose & the engine covering is far far better advertised than the ones on the original Silver Arrows, which get obscured by the hideous black :P

  37. Icthyes says:

    Wow! This design simply screams “aggressive”. Still Red Bull and Mercedes to come, but barring any surprises from other quarters, if RBR and Merc come out with stuff more similar to Ferrari’s, this gamble might just pay off for McLaren massively.

    And I hate to sound like a Ferrari-basher (you guys sure can get touchy when someone criticises the Scuderia), but it looks like McLaren have been a lot more innovative with their design.

    • Scribe says:

      Don’t tip toe around the tifosi they can handle themselves.

      I think your right though, if rumours are to be belived from the italian press about trouble in manerello, an B spec models etc, then Macca might just be in for a very good year.

      Still I Mercedes and Redbull are definately a threat, but if you ask me, engine trouble at Renault and a lack of continuity at Merc may fall into McLarens hands all the more.

  38. Dan Bigham says:

    who else has noticed the weird scoop/splitter under the front nose? From the frontal picture it looks silver and like a scoop but the other pictures seem to show it like a black splitter. any ideas?

    Also the front wing is extremely similar to the one Hamilton tested in practice at Valencia (i think it was?. He managed to damage an end piece going wide into the wall though i think and didn’t run it in the race…

  39. wasiF1 says:

    To me the main difference between Ferrari & McLaren is the engine cover apart from the aerodynamics.

  40. YeaMon says:

    Don’t really like the looks. The fin, nose, front wing, etc all look wrong. Can’t give any specifics but overall I like the ferrari better.

    I do hope it will be on pace, I’m all for having numerous cars with a chance of victory.

  41. BNK Racing says:

    so are all the cars going to have a blank diffuser until testing? the pics i saw on bbc showed ferrari had a blank diffuser as well. the 2010 cars look obese compared to the 09’s. the front wings seem to be the only place the designers can go aero crazy! lol. in 08 it was the whole car…in 09/10 its just the front wing lol. almost feel sorry for them lol

  42. Jess says:

    Sweet Silver Go Brits

  43. CounterStrike says:

    I would like to know how many of you Ferrari fans out there honestly believe that the mp4-25 is the prettier of the two cars.

    • Hairs says:

      You could show the average Ferrari fan a picture of a naked Kelly Brook and they’d still claim the Ferrari looks better.

  44. Dan Bigham says:

    I’ve been looking at the front nose even closer and i’m really surprised nobody else has noticed this!?

    Take a look at the underneath of the nose. There is a splitter/scoop. These three pictures demonstrate it well, the 3rd picture showing the engineers hands inside it:

    http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mp4_25.jpg

    http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/mp4-25_studio-3.jpg

    and

    http://www.mclaren.com/photographic/plogger/thumbs/lrg-5000-img_3006.jpg

    This is an extract from the MP4-25 tech spec off the McLaren website “Bodywork – Carbonfibre composite. Separate engine cover, sidepods and floor. Structural nose with intergral front wing. ” Note ‘Structural nose with INTERGRAL front wing’. Granted that could be just describing that the front wing is integral with the nose, but technically it is detachable and bolted together, so i think that is hinting towards the integral wing underneath the nose shown in the pictures.

    Quite an interesting feature, very similar i think to the old central ’spoon scoops’ of the pre 2009 regs front wings. Circumventing the regulation that limits the central 500mm section of the wing between the lowest plane and a set distance above it to be an aerodynamically neutral shape pre-determined by the FIA.

    Another feature of it is that it aims airflow towards the sidepods, considering the intakes are unusually small, it could help force feed air into the ducts.

    Two other points on this, it adds a structural cross support between the two wing supports, effectively making the front wing stiffer and less likely to swing and move like the RB5 experienced last season. And also it makes the air flowing underneath it expand into a large space under the nose as it tapers upwards after the scoop, creating a low pressure sucking the car down, which Renault spoke off as a reason for their choice of a low nose in 2009.

    So all in all, more downforce, more cooling and more structural support.

    • Neil D says:

      I made a reply about that about 2pm – it’s a fascinating addition!

      • Scribe says:

        I think you could just about get away with calling that innovative no?

        Still I don’t know why they’ve announced it like this. Sureley the other teams will have noticed and will be designing they’re own as we speak.

    • fantasticplanet says:

      Dan, I think noone mentioned it because it’s the williams f31 snow plow splitter under the nose.

      • Dan Bigham says:

        Yea I’ve just looked into that. Still it’s definetely bigger and considering it’s been built as an integral part of the design (I’d have thought so anyway) then it should work effectively. On the whole though the design of the car is very developed and intricate.

    • I must’ve missed Neil’s reply earlier, but I think this is a really interesting feature on the car. We’ve got the vertical black elements either side of the nose, the splitter that Dan mentions, and what looks like the mandatory camera mountings very low to the ground (correct me if I’m wrong). That whole area looks very highly developed.

      Plus the air intakes for the brakes which overlap across the inside of the wheels. Very intricate design work.

      • John Beamer says:

        Yup – it’s effectively a more developed version of the Williams’ snow plough. Sitting at that height it is above the bargeboard exclusion zone. It has two functions – create low pressure below the nose and divert air to the sidepods.

        You’ve got to be quite careful about what you do under the nose because that is the easiest way to trash the airflow to the floor.

  45. Younger Hamilton says:

    The Santander stickers are gone i thought they extended their Partnership with Mclaren Despite signing a 5 year deal with Ferrari

  46. Scribe says:

    I’ve just noticed something. The back wing doesn’t have a sponser, surley thats one of the most veiwed areas in f1, sometimes one of the most iconic.

    Sureley they’ll find someone willing to print a name for cash on what is likely to be a race winning rearwing.

  47. f1nexus says:

    It looks like last year’s Renault.

  48. Will says:

    Oh, sex on wheels!!! What a beautiful car. I wish mine looked like that. I know no boot or cd/radio but WOW!!!!!

  49. The most radical design car since the Williams of 2004!

  50. sato113 says:

    i’m glad it’s got #1 on it. :)

Leave a Reply

No swearing, insults, advertising or racial, sexual or similar discrimination allowed.

For more information see the F1Fanatic Comment Policy

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Has your comment not appeared? Try waiting a moment and then refresh the page. If it still doesn't appear and you've checked your comment meets the terms of our comment policy then contact F1Fanatic with the details of your comment so we can look into it.

If you wish to complain about a comment please contact the editor directly.