<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McLaren MP4-25 launch pictures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:53:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: griff</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-401534</link>
		<dc:creator>griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-401534</guid>
		<description>ridicularizing? That&#039;s not even a real word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridicularizing? That&#8217;s not even a real word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-343633</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-343633</guid>
		<description>well informed bunch arent you all

ah well.. This weekend will show you the car isnt quite up to it...yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well informed bunch arent you all</p>
<p>ah well.. This weekend will show you the car isnt quite up to it&#8230;yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabio pellim</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-342644</link>
		<dc:creator>fabio pellim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-342644</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know something about that new air entrance on Mclaren&#039;s new car, something that is activated by the driver&#039;s knee???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know something about that new air entrance on Mclaren&#8217;s new car, something that is activated by the driver&#8217;s knee???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petepigottcom</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-339847</link>
		<dc:creator>petepigottcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 05:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-339847</guid>
		<description>the car is functional, its tail creates more downforce, you will notice that the inlet continues to the end right up to the tail of the car. Many people have said that it prevents downforce, quite opposite, infact it creates more with the vacuum of air moving to the very back of the car as there seems to be no outlet for the air itself at the back. From what I can see it provides the car with more stability.
I should see no problem with this design legally considering last years double diffuser controversy.
If this car does not pass FIA standards, so too Jenson Buttons car of 2009, which means he would not have taken victory &amp; return his crown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the car is functional, its tail creates more downforce, you will notice that the inlet continues to the end right up to the tail of the car. Many people have said that it prevents downforce, quite opposite, infact it creates more with the vacuum of air moving to the very back of the car as there seems to be no outlet for the air itself at the back. From what I can see it provides the car with more stability.<br />
I should see no problem with this design legally considering last years double diffuser controversy.<br />
If this car does not pass FIA standards, so too Jenson Buttons car of 2009, which means he would not have taken victory &amp; return his crown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubel_Frm_BD</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-337072</link>
		<dc:creator>Rubel_Frm_BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-337072</guid>
		<description>Hey i am totally agree with u. They called Ferrari a cheat but they forget that it is Mclaren who stole the Ferrari&#039;s design, did chetting in races (hamilton let passes Trulli) even have some penalti for cheating and fined 100 million.

Ferrari&#039;s design is working very well and its is a very strong car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey i am totally agree with u. They called Ferrari a cheat but they forget that it is Mclaren who stole the Ferrari&#8217;s design, did chetting in races (hamilton let passes Trulli) even have some penalti for cheating and fined 100 million.</p>
<p>Ferrari&#8217;s design is working very well and its is a very strong car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: three4three</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-332279</link>
		<dc:creator>three4three</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-332279</guid>
		<description>So you must be some kind of pro then Rog.  Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you must be some kind of pro then Rog.  Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-332275</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-332275</guid>
		<description>that comment just about sums up the views on this site. I doubt any of you have even been to a race let alone seen a n F1 car in the flesh.

&#039;Ron&#039;, my friend, has nothing to do with F1 and hasn&#039;t for the past two years.

All we need to do now is keep our ridicules comments to ourselves and watch the red cars win the championship again. 

Remember, It is better to remain quiet and be thought of as a fool that to open your mouths and have it confirmed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that comment just about sums up the views on this site. I doubt any of you have even been to a race let alone seen a n F1 car in the flesh.</p>
<p>&#8216;Ron&#8217;, my friend, has nothing to do with F1 and hasn&#8217;t for the past two years.</p>
<p>All we need to do now is keep our ridicules comments to ourselves and watch the red cars win the championship again. </p>
<p>Remember, It is better to remain quiet and be thought of as a fool that to open your mouths and have it confirmed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ad</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-326209</link>
		<dc:creator>ad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-326209</guid>
		<description>the new mclaren looks much bigger and much heavier than any of the other cars.  i know the people in charge of designing it are among the best in the world and who am i to question them, but i have a nagging worry they&#039;ve gone too far with enlarging it to accomodate the extra fuel.  it seems logical that the smaller cars will be better in the bends.  anyway, won&#039;t know true dimensions till its out on track; studio photos can be misleading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the new mclaren looks much bigger and much heavier than any of the other cars.  i know the people in charge of designing it are among the best in the world and who am i to question them, but i have a nagging worry they&#8217;ve gone too far with enlarging it to accomodate the extra fuel.  it seems logical that the smaller cars will be better in the bends.  anyway, won&#8217;t know true dimensions till its out on track; studio photos can be misleading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-326185</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-326185</guid>
		<description>My first impressions are positive.  The new car looks original and unique and I especially like the new radically innovative looking shark fin.  It looks less bulbus and more agressive than last years car.  It does however come across as looking heavy in the middle but I suspect its because of the new shark fin.  Again I&#039;m curious to see how different and how far the new double diffuser design has been taken.  I&#039;m also really surprised how much longer the car is so as to incorporate the larger fuel tank.  

Naturally I hope this all translates well to the track and we see some good strong results...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first impressions are positive.  The new car looks original and unique and I especially like the new radically innovative looking shark fin.  It looks less bulbus and more agressive than last years car.  It does however come across as looking heavy in the middle but I suspect its because of the new shark fin.  Again I&#8217;m curious to see how different and how far the new double diffuser design has been taken.  I&#8217;m also really surprised how much longer the car is so as to incorporate the larger fuel tank.  </p>
<p>Naturally I hope this all translates well to the track and we see some good strong results&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvs</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/01/29/mclaren-mp4-25-launch-pictures/comment-page-5/#comment-324969</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29014#comment-324969</guid>
		<description>i wouldnt want to touch that car! might loose a finger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wouldnt want to touch that car! might loose a finger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 14/30 queries in 0.050 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 483/499 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 08:07:25 -->
