<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Force India VJM03 and VJM02 compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/</link>
	<description>F1 Fanatic - The Formula 1 Blog with F1 news, pictures, video, comment and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaz</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-337150</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-337150</guid>
		<description>I like it and I hope they can deliver...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it and I hope they can deliver&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onks rs</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-331850</link>
		<dc:creator>onks rs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-331850</guid>
		<description>the 2010 car is very cool in design ...new shark fin...much similar to mclaren ...so a grt opportunity for force india to score pts this year...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 2010 car is very cool in design &#8230;new shark fin&#8230;much similar to mclaren &#8230;so a grt opportunity for force india to score pts this year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G-force</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330447</link>
		<dc:creator>G-force</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330447</guid>
		<description>VJM03 is much more stable than its predeccesor,lot of work has been done o the evolution of the car in respect of the front wing design and the rear .It also has a deal with TCS in fluid dyamics ,so it has an edge over the previous car design.The sidepods are much simpler and straight forward ,the technical partership with Mclaren Mercedes has immensly helped in the development of the Car,Hope to see it regularly in podiums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VJM03 is much more stable than its predeccesor,lot of work has been done o the evolution of the car in respect of the front wing design and the rear .It also has a deal with TCS in fluid dyamics ,so it has an edge over the previous car design.The sidepods are much simpler and straight forward ,the technical partership with Mclaren Mercedes has immensly helped in the development of the Car,Hope to see it regularly in podiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrickl</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-330376</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrickl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330376</guid>
		<description>narrower maybe, but the same diameter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>narrower maybe, but the same diameter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harshad Joshi</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330167</link>
		<dc:creator>Harshad Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330167</guid>
		<description>The cars front chassis dosent look attractive/competitive as the mercedes mgp or the mclaren one.  I think theoy should have a sukhoi fighter type curved front nose adapted for f1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cars front chassis dosent look attractive/competitive as the mercedes mgp or the mclaren one.  I think theoy should have a sukhoi fighter type curved front nose adapted for f1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330148</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330148</guid>
		<description>What I like to see is the rear sitting a bit higher in readiness for the extra 100 or so kilos of fuel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I like to see is the rear sitting a bit higher in readiness for the extra 100 or so kilos of fuel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wasiF1</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330134</link>
		<dc:creator>wasiF1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330134</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What we also see on the VJM03 is much simpler sidepods and a McLaren-style undercut air intake plus a ’shark fin’&#8221;</p>
<p>If I am not wrong Force India has a technical deal with Mclaren Mercedes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330103</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330103</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, I wonder if Force India have got something here. They&#039;ve focused a lot of attention on the front end of the car, as much of the rear end is taken care of by Mclaren and Mercedes. An outside bet for a race win this year...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I wonder if Force India have got something here. They&#8217;ve focused a lot of attention on the front end of the car, as much of the rear end is taken care of by Mclaren and Mercedes. An outside bet for a race win this year&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etienne Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-2/#comment-330076</link>
		<dc:creator>Etienne Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330076</guid>
		<description>http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81365

LEAKED LOTUS PHOTO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81365" rel="nofollow">http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81365</a></p>
<p>LEAKED LOTUS PHOTO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zahir</title>
		<link>http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/02/09/force-india-vjm03-and-vjm02-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-330067</link>
		<dc:creator>Zahir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/?p=29484#comment-330067</guid>
		<description>This years front tyres are smaller then last years but the rears are the same size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This years front tyres are smaller then last years but the rears are the same size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 12/26 queries in 0.058 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 477/485 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.f1fanatic.co.uk @ 2012-02-10 10:30:07 -->
