Changing tracks: Circuit de Catalunya

Two of Catalunya's quick corners were chopped in 2007

Two of Catalunya's quick corners were chopped in 2007

Formula 1 holds its 20th race at the Circuit de Catalunya this weekend.

The track has changed little in that time. But after only three years one corner which several drivers called the best on the track was cut.

More recently two other fast corners have been neutered by the introduction of a chicane. The track has gained an unenviable reputation for producing boring races.

Circuit de Catalunya: 1991

Length: 4.747km

Circuit de Catalunya: 2010

Length: 4.655km

How the track has changed

Campsa and Nissan

The first eight corners on the Circuit de Catalunya are the same now as they were in 1991. Campsa is the first corner to have changed – it became a longer turn in 1995 to bypass the Nissan chicane.

Johnny Herbert was among the drivers who called the fast right-left Nissan chicane the best corner on the track. But in 1994, following a spate of crashes including those which claimed Ayrton Senna and Roland Ratzenberg, the drivers decided this corner had to go. An 11th-hour strike threat on the eve of the Grand Prix forced the organisers to build a temporary tyre wall in front of the offending corner.

The following year Campsa led directly onto an extended straight leading towards La Caixa and the Nissan corner was consigned to history.

La Caixa

La Caixa was the next corner to be changed, in 2004. By tightening the corner the race organisers hoped more overtaking would be encouraged.

The corner has seen some controversial clashes in other championships – Lewis Hamilton was knocked out of the lead by GP2 team mate Alexandre Premat here in 2006, and too much argy-bargy in the DTM race in 2007 led Audi to make a controversial mass withdrawal.

But there’s been precious little action there in F1.

New Holland chicane

Two more fast corners were neutered in 2007: Europcar and New Holland. Again, this was because the organisers felt the corners were being taken too quickly for the amount of run-off area available.

Like the other changed parts of the circuit the original corners are still there but are no longer used for Formula 1.

An unpopular circuit

The Circuit de Catalunya is a classic example of how even relatively modern circuits have had to change to meet increasingly stringent safety demands.

Although it has retained some of its high-speed corners the changes have altered the circuit’s character. The loss of Nissan and the change at La Caixa have sapped the middle part of the lap of its tempo and rhythm.

When the circuit was first built prevailing wisdom held that the combination of a fast final corner and a long straight leading into a braking zone would encourage overtaking, as cars would be able to slipstream each other down the straight.

However in the two decades which have passed since then increasing aerodynamic refinement on F1 cars has made them more sensitive to following in the disturbed air of a leading car and reduced the beneficial effect of slipstreaming on a straight.

Perhaps modern F1 cars are more to blame than the track for producing unexciting races. The Spanish Grand Prix was voted the third worst race of the year here in 2008 and again in 2009.

What do you think of the changes made to the Circuit de Catalunya over the years? Have they been for the better or worse? Have your say in the comments.

Circuit de Catalunya 2010

Circuit de Catalunya 2010 (click to enlarge)

How F1 tracks have changed

Advert | Go Ad-free


64 comments on Changing tracks: Circuit de Catalunya

  1. The Circuit de Catalunya was designed by former racing driver Luis Perez Sala. Has anyone can recall Sala overtaking? I can’t.

  2. Anshumaan said on 3rd May 2010, 15:47

    and i feel hermann tilke should not be used to upgrade any track!!!!..he has killed the rhythm of the last section and catalunya looks a sorry figure now
    I can’t understand why is Tilke used for every track????
    I am bored with his tracks no flow no rhythm just chicanes long straights and a twisty section!! Isn’t there any other track designer??
    I feel ppl who watched f1 in the 60s and 70s were damn lucky in that respect.Aleast the tracks were more challenging then!!!

  3. F1Fan said on 3rd May 2010, 15:48

    Why do I have this feeling that Alonso is going to win this race ?

  4. I think that F1 cars are slightly to blame for this one as the moto gp guys tend to have a decent enough dog fight here. :)

    Maybe they should get the guys in who did silverstone (assuming it works out).

  5. dcowF1 said on 3rd May 2010, 16:41

    I think the Circuit de Catalunya in Montmelo is a victim of the aero bias on todays F1 cars and, I’m sorry to say guys but, I find all the alternatives posted here pig ugly ******** of a beautiful flowing circuit… including the current real life variation.

    Personally they should return the track to its original form (including the Nissan right/left) and fix any safety issues by creating more run off and better barriers, and leave the track well alone!!… even if that means moving the land about a bit. From what I’ve seen on the satellite view its perfectly possible.

    MotoGP 2009 at Montmelo was the one and only top level event I’ve been to live in my life… I will get to an F1 event yet, once I’ve saved a life fortune, and my wee boy is old enough to understand and enjoy the entire weekend… however, the entire MotoGP event and race was simply awesome.

    The problem is not the circuit.

    • Icthyes said on 3rd May 2010, 20:02

      Or rather, the problem doesn’t have to be the circuit.

      Considering, though, the amount of changes that have been made to circuits to improve them (whether they’ve succeeded or not), and the amount of changes made to the cars to improve them, I think you’d have to say that changing the circuit is more realistic.

      Racing quality aside, I always found Catalunya boring to drive around on Playstation, and from the on-board shots. Spa and Monza flow; to me, Catalunya just feels like going around in alternating half-circles.

  6. taurus said on 3rd May 2010, 17:01

    I think Catalunya would be a much bigger challenge and more exciting if they went the other way around it(anti clockwise) without the chicane.

    Probably wouldn’t improve chances of overtaking, though.

  7. glue said on 3rd May 2010, 18:16

    remember the 1999 GP here..only one on-track overtake..was there as much emphasis on aero as it is today?

  8. Pingguest said on 3rd May 2010, 18:29

    As Circuit de Catalunya provides good racing with MotoGP-bikes, we should come to the conclusion that the track is not the main problem. Aerodynamics and pit stops are.

    • Icthyes said on 3rd May 2010, 19:59

      Yup, all we need to do is make the cars no more than 1 foot in width and give the the ability to tilt!

      • David A said on 4th May 2010, 2:38

        GP2 cars aren’t 1 foot wide, but produce good races at locations like Valencia where the F1 cars keep having processional races.

  9. glue said on 3rd May 2010, 18:33

    think of how many lines can a motorbike take through turn 3, or any other turns for that matter, compared to a 180 cm-wide F1 car

  10. 130r said on 3rd May 2010, 18:54

    I think they should drop the two spanish races and replace them with a race at motorland aragon and make a new event at Potrero de los funes in Argentina

  11. andy bono said on 3rd May 2010, 23:05

    As an “all times attendant” in Barcelona’s track I think I have right to say my oppinion, this is what I think about this discussion. Circuit de Catalunya is one of the most challenging circuits in calendar. All F1 teams, choose this track to test the cars, year over year, and not only for climate conditions. Catalonian people always have been recognised for dedication and hospitality, showing all the world that Montmeló is a “must seen” GP for the sport. Only the best at Catalunya!

  12. zomtec said on 4th May 2010, 11:09

    I rate Campsa still as a good and quick corner, La Caixa hairpin is okay but I always loved to see the cars going round the last two downhill high speed corners. Please bring them back!

  13. ESPImperium said on 4th May 2010, 16:32

    Personally, if they re-posistioned the grandstands to be more going away from the track, this would give the run off area needed, but with that id also tighten the last corner, make this more of a 90 degree lefthander, altho not great for Moto GP, would be ideal for F1.

    And with this lies the problem, is theis a bike track that has to be neutered for F1 or a F1 track that needs to be neutered for Moto GP. There needs to be a ballance here.

    I think that the orginisers here should maybe see what has been done at Suzuka and now being implemented at Silverstone to take the track into the next 20 years of its life. As the only way this track is gonna go is off the callander, just like the French GP.

    I just wish the chicane before the last corner wasnt there as it takes the momentum and rythm of the track away.

  14. Jesse said on 4th May 2010, 18:10

    Very nice showing all the old GP tracks.. But you’ve missed the old Albert park track

  15. Anthony said on 5th May 2010, 11:46

    Take away the chicane and bank the last corner so its easily flat plus tighten the first turn

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.