Yesterday’s news about F1 returning to America generally prompted two reactions from fans.
As well as welcoming F1’s new race in Austin in 2012, a lot of people urged the race promoters to pick someone other than Hermann Tilke to design the track.
Tilke’s company has designed or altered almost every track on the F1 calendar. Several of his designs have been criticised for being unexciting – but is that criticism misplaced?
Update: The race promoters have confirmed the track will be designed by Tilke.
Prisoner Monkeys made this case in Tilke’s defence:
Hermann Tilke works within rules set out by th FIA. Anyone who replaced him would be bound by those same rules and would only produce a similar circuit. If you look at some of Tilke?óÔé¼Ôäós non-F1 designs ?óÔé¼ÔÇ£ Motorland Aragon springs to mind ?óÔé¼ÔÇ£ you?óÔé¼Ôäóll see that he?óÔé¼Ôäós actually pretty good.
It?óÔé¼Ôäós the rules, not the designer that needs changing. And if FOTA get the regulations for the cars right, they may not even need that.
Anyone who thinks designers like Tilke have a free rein when it comes to creating circuits is mistaken – at least, if they want their circuits to be used for Formula 1.
The FIA’s circuit regulations are specific and demanding (see PDF here). The length, width, gradient and camber of new tracks are all tightly defined by the rules.
Natural boundaries and terrain also limit Tilke’s scope. Istanbul is a good track thanks to the hilly terrain it is built on. Whereas Valencia has no gradient and no room for any quick corners.
Despite these caveats, I think some of the criticism of Tilke is justified. He’s penned some excellent tracks, like Istanbul Park and Sepang, but others have been missed opportunities.
At Yas Island for example, despite the track being constructed on a man-made island at gigantic expense, Tilke found it necessary to include low-speed chicanes as part of the circuit design – one of which immediately precedes another low-speed corner.
Even the drivers – who usually stick to an uncontroversial PR line when asked to give their opinions – have been moved to criticise Yas Island. Adrian Sutil did over the winter and Lucas di Grassi had this to say when I spoke to him about it earlier this month:
[In] Abu Dhabi, you have completely free space to do whatever you want, as much run-off area as you like, so maybe like corner eight in Turkey they should do more challenging, fast corners. It would be nicer for the drivers, better for the spectacle.
Lucas di Grassi
But the amount of criticism Tilke gets from fans is out of proportion with the extent of his responsibility for the standard of modern F1 tracks.
If Bernie Ecclestone points at an industrial estate in Valencia and says ‘put a track there’, there’s very little Tilke can do within the constraint of his brief and the rules to create the next Spa-Francorchamps or even an Istanbul Park.
Although Silverstone avoided using Tilke for the latest changes to their circuit, it would be a surprise if anyone other than Tilke was charged with building Austin’s Formula 1 track.
Hopefully he’ll get the space and the resources to come up with a worthwhile addition to the F1 calendar.
- How Hermann Tilke conquered the F1 calendar (Video)
- Don?óÔé¼Ôäót blame Hermann Tilke, blame the rules
- Silverstone boss explains why they didn?óÔé¼Ôäót use Tilke for Arena track upgrades
- Tilke?óÔé¼Ôäós latest track has F1?óÔé¼Ôäós answer to the Laguna Seca corkscrew (Pictures)
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others