Virgin gambled on an aggressive low-downforce set-up at Montreal but changing track conditions and continued unreliability meant a poor race for the team.
|Timo Glock||Lucas di Grassi|
|Qualifying time comparison (Q1)||1’18.941 (-0.734)||1’19.675|
|Average race lap||1’25.921 (-0.838)||1’26.760|
The Lotuses draw ever further out of reach – Glock was seven-tenths of a second slower than the quickest of the T127s at Montreal in qualifying.
Technical director Nick Wirth explained Glock’s troubles during the race:
For us, the worse-case tyre degradation that we planned for occurred, and the team did an unprecedented eight pit stops, all very smoothly.
We came out of the first lap in reasonable shape but unfortunately Timo had been hit from behind which cost him over 10% of his downforce, mainly at the rear. With rear tyre degradation as the dominant factor, his possibility of being competitive was effectively over and he had to do a number of very short stints and cope with this issue.
A steering rack leak ended Glock’s race.
Lucas di Grassi
Was around 50 seconds behind Heikki Kovalainen when he lost hydraulic pressure and had to finish the race without changing gear.
Finished five laps down, but his low-downforce set-up meant he was fourth-quickest through the speed trap, hitting 323kph.
2010 Canadian Grand Prix
- Technical review: Canadian Grand Prix
- Canadian Grand Prix was best race since Brazil 2008, F1 Fanatic readers say
- Kubica contact cost me fifth – Sutil
- “Can’t afford to just take points” – Hamilton
- Schumacher “closed the door too much”
- Alonso had fastest pit stop in Canada
- Alonso expects improvements at Ferrari
- 2010 Canadian Grand Prix – the complete F1 Fanatic race weekend review
- Hamilton wins despite more pit stop problems (McLaren race review)
- Alonso blames traffic for losing first and second places (Ferrari race review)
Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others