Montezemolo expects FIA reaction

Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo said he expects the FIA to analyse the circumstances of yesterday’s European Grand Prix.

Ferrari expressed outrage yesterday that Lewis Hamilton was able to finish second in the race after taking a drive-through penalty for overtaking the safety car, while their drivers finished lower down the field after staying behind the safety car.

Di Montezemolo said:

The result of yesterday?s race was misrepresentative. Ferrari, which showed itself to be competitive in the European Grand Prix, paid a price that was too high for respecting the rules.

Meanwhile those who didn?t follow the rules were penalised by the race officials in a way that was less severe than the damage suffered by those who did respect them. That is a very serious and unacceptable event that creates dangerous precedents, throwing a shadow over the credibility of Formula One.

We are sure that the FIA will fully analyse what happened, taking the consequent necessary decisions. Ferrari will watch this with interest.
Luca di Montezemolo

2010 European Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 European Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free

58 comments on Montezemolo expects FIA reaction

1 2 3
  1. Kyle said on 28th June 2010, 14:07

    The safety car rules, yet again, need tweaking. Whether this is by changing the timing of the SC’s entry to the track or by closing the pitlane (as done in 2008, no longer a fuel issue involved), something does need to be done.

    However, if Luca’s looking for some further retribution, he’ll be severely disappointed.

    • BasCB said on 28th June 2010, 14:14

      The rules maybe are OK but it seems the race management involving SC can do with some clarifycations and simple rules of what to do and what not to do (Race Control, teams and drivers).

    • Like I said yesterday they need to get rid of the SC altogether. Its always been unfair in every race its used as it penalises those who have driven well as they lose the lead they fairly built up. The perfect example would be China this year when Button, Rosberg and Kubica put nearly a minute on the field with a brilliant strategic call only to have it wiped out by a SC. Then you have days like yesterday when the SC brings the sport into disrepute.

      The only justification for a SC was that it would neutralise the race to allow debry to be safely removed from the track but it’s been 16 years since they brought in SCs and technology has moved on there should be better ways for the race to be neutralised. It would be perfectly feasable for each car to be equipped with a SC speed limiter like the pit lane one which would have to be activated by the driver within 5 seconds of the SC boards being put out.

      The drivers could then travel round at a safe speed untill the track is clear when the race could resume without the neutralisation of the race hurting anyone.

      • disjunto said on 28th June 2010, 19:07

        one of the best things a safety car does for the safety of the marshals is leave a very large gap where there are no cars coming up, allowing them to get on track very safely to do some clean up.

        without a SC they would be running on and off the track every few seconds, making it take longer to clear up, and more like a car will run something over

        • P. Rippon said on 29th June 2010, 13:23

          Exactly the point. The safety car is there to control the speed and route of the cars following. Imagine if this was done electronically as suggested and other teams were able to tap into each others ssystem!! Alonso since his first win, has lost the plot and in front of his home fans (who love Lewis)he looked like putting on a show, hence his frustration with his arch enemy putting one over him!

    • macahan (@macahan) said on 29th June 2010, 5:36

      I would have to agree. No reason to have the pit open during SC periods anylonger. Main reason it was allowed was to avoid drivers running out of fuel or be forced into penalty for pitting while it was closed. In indycar on ovals it’s a mad horrible scramble to get in and out and honestly not very safe and field always shuffles around but rules are simple and few complaints. Well some wants the lapped cars to be able to pass the SC to have them filed up in grid order on green (which F1 does but don’t see much better racing for it).

    • Achilles said on 29th June 2010, 7:06

      In my view, Ferrari would be better adopting a more conciliatory tone with the FIA, there could be grounds for bringing the sport into disrepute, as there comments aimed at the FIA are too vociferous, and seem unsportsmanlike.

  2. BasCB said on 28th June 2010, 14:10

    He was deemed to do so, wasn’t he? And from the results of your Poll here Keith, (Fans 45/45 thinking Hamilton did/did not do this on purpose) suggests it would be good if the FIA did some open clarification of what happened there including evidence from radio communications, video and telemetry.

    I am not sure about it being intentional to make sure Alonso does not make it. It might be (we have another guy driving around where i would be pretty sure of that, he stopped for the red light), but i rather think Lewis just hesitated.

    But “not remembering” sounds like a lazy excuse for not answering questions and Ferrari were really unlucky/tricked by Lewis here in front of Alonso’s fans.

    But even so Ferrari could have reacted with tactics, keeping Massa out there as well to split strategy. Or whatever strategy to have a go at something, Sauber showed focussing and thinking out of the box might be better than just complaining.

    I found it pretty silly for Ferrari to expect 9 drivers to receive serious punishments for the time infringement and concentrating only on this Hamilton thing.

    • bosyber said on 28th June 2010, 14:55

      I think Ferrari are weakening their case for SC rule changes by focusing on Hamilton who could have easily made it past without ‘hesistation’ and the front running 5 seconds penalized ones, who seem to have had little more than a corner to meet a sector time.

      The problem due to the SC timing was that Vettel gained anyway, and that the timing dropped Ferrari far behind.

      I agree with people who argue for a new look at closing the pitlane for the start of the safety car (would also have stopped Schumacher from being trapped).

      But that was not Hamiltons fault – Vettel profited even more, Hamilton only suffered because he was clumsy/outsmarted himself.

  3. KazeXT (@kazext) said on 28th June 2010, 14:16

    I’m not convinced that it would ever be possible to change the safety car rules such that pot luck does not play a role. It is inevitable that a safety car is going to benefit some and not others. If Hamilton had not hesitated as the safety car came out he would have been even further up the road from Alonso, fighting Vettel for the win.

    It’s unfortunate that the release of the safety car was mistimed, but even the teams make that kind of mistake in qualifying for example, bringing their driver out at slightly the wrong time so that he gets caught in traffic.

    I agree with Kyle, I don’t think the FIA are going to take any notice of Montezemalo; he’s just mouthing off as usual.

  4. Eric said on 28th June 2010, 14:17

    Didn’t Ferrari have some kind of veto over new rules made up by the FIA a few years ago? Now that was a ‘serious and dangerous precedent, throwing a shadow over the credibility of Formula One’. Are they mad? Also, they did score some points, four to be exact. So suck it up and don’t be such crybabies Luca and ALO.

    I didn’t really like of dislike Ferrari and Alonso, but I’m getting there.

  5. Cube said on 28th June 2010, 14:18

    Typical from Ferrari really. I’m surprised they haven’t done it at every single race this year…

  6. Rob said on 28th June 2010, 14:25

    I love the idea that LDM can say with a straight face that the results of a motor race should be ‘representative’ of the race, especially after ‘Austria-gate’!

    • Kevin said on 28th June 2010, 14:33

      Agree 100% well said

    • Maciek said on 28th June 2010, 15:01

      I wish people would grow up a little. Things that happened in races years ago, no matter how preposterous, have zero relevance to things that happen now. Let it go already.

      • DaveW said on 28th June 2010, 15:15

        It’s relevant when it’s the pot issuing enraged statments about the kettle.

      • rampante (@rampante) said on 28th June 2010, 17:10

        don’t you go and start talking sense now Maciek. Every thing that happens in this sport is followed by comments of but in 1985 he did this and in 1991 this happened. We really should only comment on the events of the race in question. Can you imagine what would happen if the stewards had the same hang ups as the fans.

        • Patrickl said on 28th June 2010, 21:28

          Is 2008 near enough? Ferrari called Singapore’s race a circus. In hind sight it sort of was one, but as Ecclestone said, Ferrari were the “clowns”. All their whining just made them look more ridculous.

          Hamilton didn’t whine, just stuck wtih it and simply got back on the podium.

        • Scribe (@scribe) said on 28th June 2010, 21:33

          Agree that the kettle is getting a little shirty on said pots actions but really Maciek is right as is rampante, Austria has sod all to do with what happened today.

          Besides Ferrari is a changed team these days, in the case of Domenacali rather fairer. Montezemolo on the other hand seems to have lost the plot. Not so much here, Ferrari got done over, rule needs to be looked at, but the self righteous indignation is quite ridiculous.

  7. Alex said on 28th June 2010, 14:30

    So typical. This is the same reaction as we saw with the double diffusers last year. Even when they were declared legal team bosses were constantly complaining how they were against the spirit of the rules etc. Everything is fine as long as it is in your team’s advantage, otherwise its unfair, against the rules, against the spirit of the rules or you name it.

  8. Madness.

    Someone needs early retirement…

  9. Bartholomew said on 28th June 2010, 14:41

    And now ladies and gentlemen ……… Lou diMonty !!!
    on the saxophone

  10. Rubbish Dave (@rubbish-dave) said on 28th June 2010, 14:41

    I’d give him more credence had he complained about the delay in Rosbergs penalty at the 2008 singapore GP.

    But of course, he liked that one as it took points off Hamilton.

  11. The safety car should have been deployed in front of Vettel as he was the leader not as Hamilton & Alonso were coming.

    • Patrickl said on 28th June 2010, 21:32

      Then Webber should have crashed into Kovalainen a little earlier.

      How are we gonna put that into the regulations?

      Article 69:
      – No car shall crash or break down on track unless the leader of the race is sufficiently far enough away from the pit lane exit for the safety car to pick him up

      That should work …

  12. Ronman said on 28th June 2010, 14:43

    safety cars suck! they always create Dilemna

    can’t see an easy solution,

  13. Glenn (@glenn) said on 28th June 2010, 14:43

    So with this can the F1 community now come together and officially change “Ferrari” to “Cryrrari”. I mean even for die-hard Ferrari fans, this has got to be a little deflating to have your team cry about spilled milk.

    Hey Cryrrari! The event played out as it did. It did not work out in your favor, All parties involved where punished. And even if hamilton did lose positions would that help your race? Would you think you could have passed Hamilton on track? Teflonso was close to 4 seconds behind Hamilton at the time of the incident and losing ground.

    Fix your car, make it faster. And focus on the things you can affect. Your own team.

  14. KNF said on 28th June 2010, 15:01

    How about a nice red whine from Maranello to go along with that humble pie???

  15. Mark Hitchcock said on 28th June 2010, 15:02

    The only way this is going to become a scandal is if Ferrari keep banging on about it.
    If they really are concerned about the credibility of the sport then they’ll stop undermining it and just accept their bad luck like grown-ups.

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.