British Grand Prix fastest laps
| Rank | Driver | Car | Fastest lap | Deficit to fastest lap |
| 1 | Fernando Alonso | Ferrari | 1’30.874 | |
| 2 | Felipe Massa | Ferrari | 1’31.646 | 0.772 |
| 3 | Sebastian Vettel | Red Bull-Renault | 1’31.967 | 1.093 |
| 4 | Mark Webber | Red Bull-Renault | 1’32.364 | 1.490 |
| 5 | Vitaly Petrov | Renault | 1’32.484 | 1.610 |
| 6 | Lewis Hamilton | McLaren-Mercedes | 1’32.758 | 1.884 |
| 7 | Nico Rosberg | Mercedes | 1’32.952 | 2.078 |
| 8 | Sebastien Buemi | Toro Rosso-Ferrari | 1’32.980 | 2.106 |
| 9 | Jenson Button | McLaren-Mercedes | 1’33.003 | 2.129 |
| 10 | Kamui Kobayashi | Sauber-Ferrari | 1’33.558 | 2.684 |
| 11 | Rubens Barrichello | Williams-Cosworth | 1’33.615 | 2.741 |
| 12 | Jaime Alguersuari | Toro Rosso-Ferrari | 1’33.748 | 2.874 |
| 13 | Nico Hülkenberg | Williams-Cosworth | 1’33.989 | 3.115 |
| 14 | Vitantonio Liuzzi | Force India-Mercedes | 1’34.018 | 3.144 |
| 15 | Michael Schumacher | Mercedes | 1’34.171 | 3.297 |
| 16 | Adrian Sutil | Force India-Mercedes | 1’34.337 | 3.463 |
| 17 | Pedro de la Rosa | Sauber-Ferrari | 1’35.883 | 5.009 |
| 18 | Heikki Kovalainen | Lotus-Cosworth | 1’36.251 | 5.377 |
| 19 | Timo Glock | Virgin-Cosworth | 1’36.415 | 5.541 |
| 20 | Jarno Trulli | Lotus-Cosworth | 1’36.519 | 5.645 |
| 21 | Robert Kubica | Renault | 1’36.846 | 5.972 |
| 22 | Sakon Yamamoto | HRT-Cosworth | 1’38.309 | 7.435 |
| 23 | Karun Chandhok | HRT-Cosworth | 1’38.798 | 7.924 |
| 24 | Lucas di Grassi | Virgin-Cosworth | 1’40.641 | 9.767 |
You need to upgrade your Flash Player
View interactive chart full screen
Tick/untick drivers’ names to show their laps, click and drag to zoom
2010 British Grand Prix
- Technical review: British Grand Prix
- Liuzzi explains hard tyre struggle
- Ten F1 fans’ stories from Silverstone
- 2010 British Grand Prix – the complete F1 Fanatic race weekend review
- Was new Silverstone a success? (Poll)
- Alonso: we’ll catch Red Bull in Germany
- Michael wants Silverstone bumps eased
- Who was the best driver of the British Grand Prix weekend? (Poll)
- Both cars in points (Williams race review)
- Kobayashi takes sixth (Sauber race review)
David A said on 11th July 2010, 18:22
If only “baby” and ‘Nando had qualified or raced in this order…
Calum said on 11th July 2010, 18:52
It’s probably just because they had fresh Softs on for the last couple of laps.
David A said on 11th July 2010, 19:11
I know, but its not been since Malaysia that i’ve seen those two on top of any table.
Manu said on 11th July 2010, 19:28
These times confirm that the car is good, maybe even better than the McLaren. However the drivers are rubbish.
Ferrari should have kept Raikonnen and sacked Massa.
Ed said on 11th July 2010, 20:27
glory laps doesn’t prove anything about a car
Oliver said on 11th July 2010, 20:29
@Manu,
Trulli was faster than Kubica, whats your conclusion on that?
Manu said on 11th July 2010, 21:37
What about Petrov then? Kubica was struggling today but the Renault is a pretty decent car.
IMO the car is good. Not great like the RB, but good. With less mistakes and more luck Alonso would have been able to be on the podium at Valencia and Silverstone. If you are just a tiny bit objective you have to admit that Ferrari’s recent disastrous results have mainly been caused by their spectacular bad luck.
Bleu said on 11th July 2010, 21:49
If you count Ferraris and Petrov out from the list, because they pitted late and therefore were having much better chances for fast laps, it just shows (again) how much faster Red Bull was.
Regarding Kubica, of course he was having 3/5 fuel when he retired, but he wasn’t really fast in any phase. Still a bit surprised that he was slower than Lotuses and Glock.