British Grand Prix fastest laps

Rank Driver Car Fastest lap Deficit to fastest lap
1 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1’30.874
2 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1’31.646 0.772
3 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 1’31.967 1.093
4 Mark Webber Red Bull-Renault 1’32.364 1.490
5 Vitaly Petrov Renault 1’32.484 1.610
6 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1’32.758 1.884
7 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1’32.952 2.078
8 Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1’32.980 2.106
9 Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1’33.003 2.129
10 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber-Ferrari 1’33.558 2.684
11 Rubens Barrichello Williams-Cosworth 1’33.615 2.741
12 Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1’33.748 2.874
13 Nico H???lkenberg Williams-Cosworth 1’33.989 3.115
14 Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes 1’34.018 3.144
15 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1’34.171 3.297
16 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 1’34.337 3.463
17 Pedro de la Rosa Sauber-Ferrari 1’35.883 5.009
18 Heikki Kovalainen Lotus-Cosworth 1’36.251 5.377
19 Timo Glock Virgin-Cosworth 1’36.415 5.541
20 Jarno Trulli Lotus-Cosworth 1’36.519 5.645
21 Robert Kubica Renault 1’36.846 5.972
22 Sakon Yamamoto HRT-Cosworth 1’38.309 7.435
23 Karun Chandhok HRT-Cosworth 1’38.798 7.924
24 Lucas di Grassi Virgin-Cosworth 1’40.641 9.767

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

View interactive chart full screen

Tick/untick drivers? names to show their laps, click and drag to zoom

2010 British Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 British Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free

8 comments on British Grand Prix fastest laps

  1. David A said on 11th July 2010, 18:22

    If only “baby” and ‘Nando had qualified or raced in this order…

  2. Manu said on 11th July 2010, 19:28

    These times confirm that the car is good, maybe even better than the McLaren. However the drivers are rubbish.

    Ferrari should have kept Raikonnen and sacked Massa.

  3. Oliver said on 11th July 2010, 20:29

    @Manu,
    Trulli was faster than Kubica, whats your conclusion on that?

    • Manu said on 11th July 2010, 21:37

      What about Petrov then? Kubica was struggling today but the Renault is a pretty decent car.

      IMO the car is good. Not great like the RB, but good. With less mistakes and more luck Alonso would have been able to be on the podium at Valencia and Silverstone. If you are just a tiny bit objective you have to admit that Ferrari’s recent disastrous results have mainly been caused by their spectacular bad luck.

  4. Bleu said on 11th July 2010, 21:49

    If you count Ferraris and Petrov out from the list, because they pitted late and therefore were having much better chances for fast laps, it just shows (again) how much faster Red Bull was.

    Regarding Kubica, of course he was having 3/5 fuel when he retired, but he wasn’t really fast in any phase. Still a bit surprised that he was slower than Lotuses and Glock.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.