Rate the race: British Grand Prix

What did you think of the British Grand Prix? Rate the race out of ten and leave a comment below:

Rate the 2010 British Grand Prix out of ten

  • 1 (4%)
  • 2 (1%)
  • 3 (1%)
  • 4 (2%)
  • 5 (5%)
  • 6 (9%)
  • 7 (25%)
  • 8 (31%)
  • 9 (13%)
  • 10 (9%)

Total Voters: 2,342

Loading ... Loading ...

1 = ‘Terrible’, 10 = ‘Perfect’

F1 Fanatic holds polls on each race to find out which fans thought were the best and worst races during a season. Please vote based on how entertaining and exciting you thought the race was, not on how your preferred driver or team performed.

See the results for past seasons here:

2010 British Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 British Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free

173 comments on Rate the race: British Grand Prix

1 2 3 4
  1. djdaveyp said on 11th July 2010, 14:41

    9/10 – Justice for Webber. Exciting race, and more tissues for Alonso.

    • miguelF1O (@) said on 11th July 2010, 18:19

      i was thinking on writing the same when i saw the replay of vettel cutting his tyre on hamiltons car i had my closure moment and i wanted to see vettel smile shredded to pieces im sensing some alonso hating here

  2. Simon said on 11th July 2010, 14:44

    Karma is a wonderful thing!!

    and I feel sorry for Alonso. Maybe Spain will win now.

  3. As reported on Twitter … great job! You report the highlights that tell a fan what’s important to the race. Frankly, it was almost visual.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 11th July 2010, 15:54

      Thank you :-)

      • Stubie said on 11th July 2010, 16:23

        Must agree. Kudos Keith.
        You and the (mostly volunteer, I assume) team you have cultivated have managed to develop the most interesting live F1 blog.

        for the poor slobs like me who have to suffer through Fox delayed broadcasts in the US this is a life saver

        • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 13th July 2010, 10:46

          Yes, the live bloggers are volunteers and they do a terrific job. The comments come in thick and fast during the race and they stay on top of it admirably well.

          We can always use more people to help run the live blogs though, so if anyone would like to please get in touch by emailling me, using Twitter or leave a comment below.

  4. TommyB (@tommyb89) said on 11th July 2010, 14:44

    8. Exciting start and got boring until the Safety Car. As a Vettel fan it was nice to see him come back through the field (yes he was lucky to get the safety car) Great to see him overtake all though next time he’s stuck behind a car this race will be forgotten and people will say he can’t overtake again.

    Lewis shown he is the only one who can match the Red Bull’s. I think it will all end up between Lewis trying to beat Webber for the title. If Red Bull keep favouring Vettel too much they could end up gifting the title to Mclaren.

    • Julie said on 13th July 2010, 9:20

      I agree after the front wing incident Webber was saying he wouldn’t have signed if he’d known they would act like that. I am a massive Vettel fan but I was embarrassed for red bull after that.

      I was watching from Vale and I saw Vettel overtake Massa, but it was so exciting waiting to see who he’d overtaken on each lap.

      It started as a joke saying the red bulls would take each other out but it’s not funny anymore- if they want to win they need to remember that although they arte individual drivers, they are still just part of a TEAM!!!

      • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:09

        I am not a Vettel fan, and have been forced to downgrade my feeling for Red Bull and Vettel. But at least Vettel showed in those last 20 laps that he does know how to overtake – the fight with Sutil was especially great to see, with two drivers having good cars and showing good close racing.

        Still do not like to see the 1-finger salute of Vettel, but well done to him for a great drive after a first corner mishap.

  5. rfs said on 11th July 2010, 14:45

    I thought the race was mildly dull before the safety car. But it was pretty good after that. So a 7 from me.

  6. Ned Flanders (@ned-flanders) said on 11th July 2010, 14:45

    8 out of 10. Really enjoyed the race, and I expected it to be a dud after qualifying.

    It’s safe to say I was off the mark when I decided the new rules were a step backwards. I do miss the strategic element off the refuelling era, but there have been so many great races this season that the rule change has been vindicated

  7. rob said on 11th July 2010, 14:49

    I’m not british, so I’ll give it a 4.

    • Tobitron said on 11th July 2010, 15:26

      How intelligent, thank you for voting.

    • Anthony said on 11th July 2010, 15:31

      thats how you judge a grand prix? If everyone were like you the chinese grand prix would always be the best….

    • Tiomkin said on 11th July 2010, 15:34

      Rob, Welcome to Eurovision.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 11th July 2010, 15:55

      What does nationality have to do with it? The question is, was it an exciting race?

      • miguelF1O (@) said on 11th July 2010, 18:23

        im not british and i gave an 5 because it wasnt that good almost no fight for the win which was totally deserved i was expecting a bit more overtaking the vettel fight in the end was great and bbc driver tracker worked really nice for me

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 11th July 2010, 16:39

      I’m not british, just like you aren’t. So i gave it an 8 out of 10.

      Great action during the first lap. Nice moves throughout the field. I liked the fight between Alonso and Kubica. A shame Ferrari did not tell Alonso to give it back, their fault. The penalty might have been a bit harsh, but if Alonso would have served it immediately (before the SC) he would not have lost as much to fall out of the points race.
      The SC made it exciting at the front of the field and for places 7-12 again. Nice defensive driving from Sutil, the others hardly had a chance against Vettels RBR. Vettel did some pretty feisty passing, that’s something i would like to see from him more often.

      And in the end the right guy won, great comment from Mr. second driver! COTD for Mark Webber.

      • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:12

        I gave it a 7, but I mostly agree with your reasoning. Just that after Kubica was gone, and until SC, it was getting a bit dull (having seen it twice, I fast forwarded that part the 2nd time).

  8. FullSpe3d (@dryyoshi) said on 11th July 2010, 14:51

    Got very boring in the first few laps before the Safety Car, but after that it just got great and watching Vettel get past all those cars was very exciting

  9. sasbus said on 11th July 2010, 14:53

    Bore Race.
    Biased Race.
    British Track.

    • Mike Paterson said on 11th July 2010, 15:09

      How was that a boring race?
      How can a race be biased?

      Not sure what your last comment means unless it is a weak attempt at racism – please explain.

      • James_mc said on 11th July 2010, 15:17

        Leave him – Trolling.

      • rob said on 11th July 2010, 15:20

        “How was that a boring race?” – It just was.
        “How can a race be biased?” – british stewards, british gp, british commentary – all favouring the british. I dont think it gets any more bias than what we saw today.

        I dont know how you managed to get any hint of racism out of his comment.

        • Mike Paterson said on 11th July 2010, 15:25

          Hee Hee – what a load of old bollox –

          So the location of the tarmac makes a race biased ?
          So the commentators of one of the countries broadcasting the race make it biased ?

          I think you are possibly wrong about the stewards – as far as I am aware thay are not all British.

          Your overtly anti-British statements are extremely xenophobic if not racist.

          I thinkl most people here will be having a chuckle at your rather biased comments :)

        • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 11th July 2010, 15:56

          “british stewards”

          Two of the four stewards were British.

        • BasCB (@bascb) said on 11th July 2010, 16:42

          If you don’t want the british commentary, you can watch a whole range from German, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish to Czech, Dutch, Finnish and Hebrew. Have your pick.
          By the way, i like your idea of having the next GP in UN or EU territories, that are out of jurisdiction of any countries, only theres not enough space for a good track.

        • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:14

          Soo, Spain was biased to spanish drivers then? Oh, wait. The Dutch comments I hear in my 2nd viewing were not all that different, and actually a bit more critical of Alonso, for example, than the BBC was (after agreeing that it was a very harsh penalty from both commenting teams).

      • sasbus said on 11th July 2010, 15:22

        What? racist? why? Where did the race take place today dude?

        • Mike Paterson said on 11th July 2010, 15:34

          So what on earth was the point of stating “British Track”

          I would have thought that was entirely superfluous so guessed that you were stating it as a link to the 2 previous statements you made

          • sasbus said on 11th July 2010, 15:43

            Ok you want a reply – here goes. I think that the new format at Silverstone is not worth the investment. If this was Mosley’s idea of having a lot of passing then it all went awfully wrong! Silverstone is as dull as it used to be.

            BTW F1 is international and a reference to a nationality should in no way be racist…so stop whining.

            There are are goos British drivers, good British teams and there are bad British tracks. ‘nough said!

          • Lee said on 12th July 2010, 13:03

            @sasbus

            Silverstone is regarded as one of the best racks in the world and you will constantly hear drivers commenting in how much they love it. The sweeping corners in the first half are unmatched anywhere else in the world. I personally think the new section has improved the track a bit (I had been against it originally). I think it did offer more passing than the old layout and far more than many tracks on the calendar (Bahrain, Valencia, Singapore….) However passing is caused by more than just the track, The cars are the biggest problem as they are very hard to drive when close to another car which is obviously not good for passing. I would also challenge you to find a better crowd at any GP in the world. I think your comments are being taken badly as you are insinuating that the track is bad as a consequence of being British rather than singling out the particular track.

          • Klien said on 12th July 2010, 23:01

            Hmm… If this track is so biased before British drivers… Why did the Australian win?

            I think it’s a bit dumb to say it’s biased, I mean, wouldn’t every track be biased based on it’s location?

            The BBC commentators are widely regarded to be some of the best F1 commentators. But you, having an internet connection can easily access other stations.

            Also, I doubt the commentators have much of an effect on the outcome of the race, seeing as the driver usually aren’t listening to to it at the time, usually they are busy driving.

            The comment about the stewards suggests that you are an Alonso fan, who was dealt with quite harshly, but not unfairly.
            From this I can find the motivation to accuse the race of being Biased.

            If you want to talk about bias, don’t forget the discrepancy between Lotus’ and Ferrari’s expenditure. Or between Williams and RBR.

        • sasbus said on 17th July 2010, 13:23

          Maybe an answer may be found here:

          http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/85320

          and I do not watch the race on BBC or ITV. There are other good commentators around speaking other languages. Then again that depends …..

  10. David A said on 11th July 2010, 14:53

    7/10. Dull up until the safety car, but decent amount of overtaking and battling throughout the field in the second half of the race. Good effort by the least popular guy on this site to get 7th, but Webber did great 2 weeks after his flip.

  11. Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 11th July 2010, 14:54

    6/10

    Saved by the safety car.

  12. dragon said on 11th July 2010, 14:56

    9/10. I’m an Aussie.

  13. Enjoyed it very much. Very happy for Webber,Lewis and Rosberg.
    Redbull has the best car but will likely not win the championship and its all because of bad management.

    I’m no Alonso fan but feel the drive through was too harsh. . If only he had given back the position to Kubica right away, he would have been fourth maybe third.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 11th July 2010, 16:44

      I am afraid of the situation at RBR going Alonso 2007 this year.

      Your right about Alonso, his team should have instructed him to let Kubica by.

    • Julie said on 13th July 2010, 9:31

      I agree I don’t personally like Alonso or ferrari, but the drive through overly penalised him compared to giving up a position.

  14. matt88 (@matt88) said on 11th July 2010, 14:59

    5/10, Alonso’s penalty is a fraud. Vettel’s great rise from hell doesn’t equalize it.

    • Mike Paterson said on 11th July 2010, 15:10

      What else could be done – He broke the rules and should have ceded the place straight away. Instead he acrried on and got the same penalty given to Hamilton last time out – a drive through – seems reasonable to me.

      • elserchin said on 11th July 2010, 15:19

        Sure, same as Hamilton, you are so funny!!!!

      • TommyB (@tommyb89) said on 11th July 2010, 15:20

        Alonso got pushed wide and had to take to the run off. He needed to let Kubica through straight away.

        Interestingly enough this is what Lewis did in Spa 2008. But he got a worse penalty. But let’s not going into that hey…

        • Do tell. Refresh my memory pls? what happened?

          • Lee said on 12th July 2010, 13:11

            I am not sure if you are trying to be sarcastic. Hamilton was forced off in a similar way by Kimi (something which I think is fine and part of racing) Hamilton then cam back on, let Kimi back past and then re overtook him. The team radioed to race control and was told that that was fine and they had done enough to avoid a penalty Hamilton managed to pass very quickly having a quicker car and nothing in the rules at the time stated that this was not allowed.(In fact he was punished for leaving the track not gaining an advantage) After the race (kimi not finishing) Hamilton was then given a points deduction after the race stewards advisor and ex-ferrari pr man, interviewed the two drivers (I add that the actual stewards did not get to interview the drivers at all!).

        • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:22

          But that was, allegedly, because it was late in the race, so they had to do the assigned after-race replacement penalty to Hamilton.

          I guess Alonso would have lost less with that penalty than he did now, but he would still have been out of the points, somewhere at 11 or 12.

      • matt88 (@matt88) said on 11th July 2010, 15:29

        Hamilton’s case is quite different.
        At Vale curve Alonso was beyond Kubica, but he gave some room. Then Kubica blocked Alonso and forced him to go outside the track.
        Alonso got some advantage from this, but it was an unclear situation.
        In the beginning the officials told him he had to give his position to Kubica (which would have been a fair penalty), but just after this communication Kubica retired. After about 15 minutes (!) then officials decided for the drive through.
        The usual luck completed the perfect day with a SC at the right time.

      • sato113 (@sato113) said on 11th July 2010, 16:57

        yeah but the stewards should have just told him to give the place back as soon as the incident happened. (before KUB retired)

        • US_Peter (@us_peter) said on 11th July 2010, 19:32

          Exactly. Once again, late and poor stewarding. If they had immediately instructed him to relinquish his position to Kubica that would have made the most sense.

        • spanky the wonder monkey said on 12th July 2010, 8:25

          why is it down to the stewards?
          alonso knew he overtook another car whilst off the circuit, so should also know that the place needs to be given back. doesn’t & shouldn’t need team or steward intervention.

          • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:26

            The team should have told him to give the position back, and Alonso himself is smart enough to figure that out. I guess after Valencia they thought: oh, well, lets see what they do, but forgot the precedent from Spa 2008 that would make leniency a bit difficult.

            But with laps being around 100 seconds, taking more than 20 minutes to decide is long, perhaps too long (but I don’t know how to improve their reaction time – a brainstorm to find ways to make that happen by FOTA would be a good initiative, I guess).

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 11th July 2010, 15:57

      Alonso’s penalty was all they could give him under the circumstances. He should have had the sense to give the position back straight away: Alonso’s race ruined after Kubica pass

      • All the drivers know the rules and I don’t think I heard Alonso blaming his crew for not telling him to give the place back, they all know you cannot cut a corner and gain an advantage and that you have to give the place back, the fact he didn’t is up to him.

        • Harv's said on 12th July 2010, 5:51

          after spa 2008, everyone knows that if you cut the corner and gain a place, you have to give it back straight away! then wait untill the second corner after the corner you cut to try overtake again.

          Alonso didnt do that and he got a penalty! clear as day!

    • Lee said on 12th July 2010, 13:05

      I hope you also thought that Hamiltons penalty in spa a few years ago was also a fraud….

  15. Victor. said on 11th July 2010, 15:00

    Happy for Webber and Button. Sad for Vettel getting into the points at all and Kubica retiring.

    Quite interesting, but nothing spectacular. A 7.

    • Victor. said on 11th July 2010, 15:03

      Oh, and extremely happy for Sauber and Williams!

    • That’s quite bitter. After Red Bull’s douchy actions this weekend I was thrilled to see Webber leading after a great start, but Vettel surprisingly was the one bringing most of the exciting overtaking. Nice drama from them this weekend. :)

      Also, great stuff again by Kobayashi.

    • Julie said on 13th July 2010, 9:40

      I am a massive Vettel fan, and I really enjoyed watching him work his way back up the field. Why (and I may be a bit naiive but I mean this genuinely) do people dislike him??? He is a natural instinctive driver and many of the cringeworthy decisions that people attribute to him are team decisions.

      I was watching from Vale and I was really excited lap to see who he’d overtaken. Because the 1st and 2nd was decided from the start.

      • bosyber said on 15th July 2010, 16:31

        But he also lets it happen, profits from it, and pretends nothing has happened.

        Adding to that, earlier this year, when Webber was on a roll, did you hear him honestly congratulate his team mate, or did he act childish and annoyed in press conferences when being behind him?

        Maybe I am by now biased against him, underdog-Webber syndrome or something, but Webber just seems over all the more mature and dependable driver this year, even though Vettel might ultimately be a bit faster.

1 2 3 4

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.