Controversy as Alonso wins manipulated race

2010 German Grand Prix review

Fernando Alonso claimed his second win of 2010 in the German Grand Prix – but only after team mate Felipe Massa was ordered to give him the win.

The change of positions has already drawn widespread criticism and both drivers were clearly subdued on the podium afterwards. The stewards are investigating what happened.

The pair took the lead at the start as both overtook Sebastian Vettel. But Vettel’s attempts to keep Alonso behind let Massa through into the lead ahead of his team mate.

Pinched between the Ferraris, Vettel slowed held up Jenson Button. That allowed the McLaren driver’s team mate to pass him as well as Mark Webber.

Vettel was the first driver to pit, his team smartly taking advantage of a small gap in the traffic behind.

Alonso reacted, pitting before Massa, but after his team mate pitted Alonso was still behind. Lewis Hamilton came in too and was briefly stuck behind Robert Kubica when he came back out.

But Mark Webber came off worst in the first round of pit stops, ultimately losing fifth place to Jenson Button. Button stayed out late and came close to getting ahead of Hamilton as well as Webber.

That left the Ferraris first and second, with Felipe Massa struggling to begin with after he switched to hard tyres.

At first it looked as though Alonso might be able to pass his team mate. He made a concerted effort when when was briefly held up behind Bruno Senna but Massa held the inside line for the hairpin and Alonso’s attempt to pass failed.

After that Massa began to pull away, building up a gap of over three seconds over his team mate. Later Alonso began to bring the gap down again and came within range as Massa hit more traffic.

It was at this point that Rob Smedley got on the radio to Massa with a message that has already become infamous. It was clearly a coded instruction to Massa telling him to let Alonso by.

Later Ferrari’s press officer Luca Colajanni defended the decision saying the team were concerned about the threat of third-placed Vettel:

If Felipe would have struggled more Vettel could have joined Fernando and that could have been a danger for the team.

When you are on the pit wall you have to think about all the potential scenarios. Vettel could have joined them and maybe in last ten laps of the race we could have been in trouble.
Luca Colajanni

However he denied Massa had been told to let Alonso by, saying:

We didn’t let Fernando pass. It was a driver decision. We inform the drivers about situation. We didn’t give any instruction at all to what they have to do. It was his own decision.
Luca Colajanni

Even when Massa slowed after being passed, Vettel wasn’t able to do anything about the Ferrari, and followed him home in third. But afterwards the stewards summoned Ferrari to explain themselves raising the possibility that Vettel may yet gain more places.

The McLaren drivers had a quiet race to fourth and fifth. They might have been pushed harder had Webber not developed a problem with high oil temperature, meaning he had to drop back from them.

Kubica took seventh ahead of the Mercedes duo, Nico Rosberg leading home Michael Schumacher after getting past him via the pit stops. Vitaly Petrov claimed the final point ahead of Kamui Koabayashi’s Sauber.

The two Williams drivers fell out of the points having started in the top ten and came home 12th and 13th.

Pedro de la Rosa ran a long first stint on the hard tyres but ultimately finished where he started in 14th.

The two Force Indias finished 16th and 17th behind Jaime Alguersuari after a terrible race for the team. Both cars were in for repairs at the end of the first lap.

The only two drivers of the new teams to finish were Timo Glock and Bruno Senna.

Alonso’s win means he is still fifth in the drivers championship but is now within 13 points of the Red Bull duo – assuming the stewards allow him to keep his win.

2010 German Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 German Grand Prix articles

Image (C) Ferrari spa

275 comments on “Controversy as Alonso wins manipulated race”

    1. Not that sure about McLaren doing this, although Lewis felt bad about the team letting Jenson attack him.

      But your right about another team trying to to exactly the same, it was RBR. Only Webber did not do the “teamplayer” role as he was just as much in WDC contention as Vettel. So he gave him a chance but made him work for it and Seb messed up.

  1. The FIA is now in the spotlight. If they fail to act and punish Ferrari then this ceases to be a ‘sport’ and the sponsors will have to consider if they wish to be associated with this kind of commercial corruption.

    1. The FIA can’t really prove that Ferrari did anything wrong. Ferrari gave their statements, and the FIA have no choice but to believe them unless, they can prove that Ferrari are lying.

      The FIA can’t penalise a team just because everyone else wants them to. They need evidence.

      1. Seems the Stewards are building a case from strong circumstantial evidence and gave a penalty nontheless.

        The first time team orders have led to a penalty. Now we’ll find out, weather Todt wants to crush down on team orders when it’s taken to the FIA world council.

  2. Clearly manipulated behind the scenes which looks bad on Ferrari. There is no justification that for Massa to make such a move to better the team, since it would have been a one-two win anyhow. But this type of direct race (and championship) manipulation can not be allowed to continue as it looks bad for the sport.

    If teams chose to give one drive better equipment over the other, then so be it; but to directly (or even indirectly) order one driver to let the other pass during a race, especially if it’s for the lead or the win, is totally out of line and does not belong in the sport.

    Ferrari have done this on numerous occasions in the past. Massa should be rightly questioned by the Stewards. And appropriately so, the teams points should be revoked for punishment.

    Given that many of the Ferrari F1 staff and drivers have changed in the past decade, it is very likely that these decisions are probably being enforced by Montezemolo himself, and its getting old.

  3. Everyone seems to be missing the point that Alonso would have passed Massa anyway.
    That is assuming that Massa did not spin off trying to stay ahead of Fernando, as he did at the last race if memory serves.

    I would have much rather seen them fight it out, just for the record.

    But Massa wasn’t robbed of anything. He was lucky to keep Vettel at bay once he had conceded the inevitable.

    1. ‘Everyone seems to be missing the point that Alonso would have passed Massa anyway.’

      How do you know? He wasn’t given the chance to prove himself.

    2. “Everyone seems to be missing the point that Alonso would have passed Massa anyway.”

      I think it is more obvious that Alonso was not able to pass Massa and more likely that he would not have been able to pass Massa for rest of the race.

      1. That “move” you refer to was Alonso trying to take advantage of an easy pass because Massa was on fresh rubber. If it had come off, great. But it was a opportunity, not a passing move he lined up.

        There is a subtle difference.

        t was very clear that Alonso would put a move on Massa before the end of the race, and I think Ferrari were equally worried about how Massa might mess up trying to defend.

        1. Not sure about that, he (and the team as well) was a bit worried about ending like Vettel did in Turkey.
          I doubt he would have done more than wait for a very clear opening or rather than risking a second place to make a risky move.

        2. “That “move” you refer to was Alonso trying to take advantage of an easy pass because Massa was on fresh rubber.”

          If Fernando couldn’t even take advantage of Massa at his weakest (on fresh, hard tyres), then there is no way that you could logically assume that “Alonso would have passed Massa anyway”. Sorry.

      1. Whoops, I meant to say that Massa may have spun because of the puncture in Britain, rather than because he was worried that his teammate was behind him like the other poster assumed.

  4. All Luca Collajani does is contradict himself!
    First, he says that he was concerned about Seb, and thinking about different scenarios, and then he denies there being any team orders!
    How stupid does he think we all are?

  5. Well how is it that we are surprised by this result after Mark Webbers remark about being the no2 driver? – Alonso is getting what he didnt get at McLaren preferential treatment – the whinger – ps Massa as Rubbins was is the better man – especially by not whinging about the incident – ps I thought it is an insult to use the left hand in asian countries?? – what if you are left handed there??

  6. Of course it makes sense to let Alonso pass for the championship. Of course they had to give a coded message. And of course the drivers are going to say it wasn’t team orders.
    So we all know what happened, but it is the way how it happened. Alonso was called into the pits first, he was attacking Massa earlier, so the intention from the team was already clear. They could have given their message to Massa earlier and everything could have been fine.
    But for some reason they had to do it in a way that couldn’t have been more obvious. They’ve basically cheated every fan of a good race for the lead. We have seen it before that sensible team orders can be applied in a sensible way (China 2008 and Brazil 2007) and no one would have complained.
    But now ferrari really shouldn’t get away with this, but I fear they will somehow…

    1. Unfortunately Stewards will need clear evidence and proof to do something. This evidence can come from Massa himself if so wishes to tell the truth.

      If no clear proof or evidence is found against Ferrari then telemetry readings should be used to explain why Massa slowed down. Something can indeed be done if it is executed correctly.

    2. “Of course they had to give a coded message.”

      Except, it wasn’t coded very well. LOL.

      To round off the message with, “Can you confirm you understood the message?” is just like putting up subtitles saying “That was a coded message, not to be taken at face value”.

  7. Everyone does it, so why is it that when ferrari does it its cheating? If YOUR team had done it itd be fair game. And thats why its called a “team”. The definition of a team is a group of individuals working together to achieve the same goal. Stop kidding yourselves, and rename the site british fanatic…. You guys are all upset cause your team was inexistent in a big chunk of the 67 laps.

      1. Mclaren do it Keith. Rewind 2 years to the same circuit. I will quote the following from YOUR article on the 2008 German GP: “Kovalainen wasted no time in letting his team mate past”

        Red Bull do that too. Have you forgotten the front wing controversy already?

        Yes, every team does that. Some are caught, some are not. That alone is the difference.

        1. “Kovalainen wasted no time in letting his team mate past”

          is not really the same as:
          “McLaren ordered Kovalainen to let Hamilton past”

          now is it?

          Fact is that Hamilton was a lot faster than Kovalainen and Kovalainen realised that he wouldn’t be able to keep Hamilton behind him. So what’s the point in delaying the inevitable then?

          Besides, Massa and Piquet let Hamilton by just as easily. Team orders too?

        2. Dude,
          if you replay Hockenheim 2008 you will clearly see that Lewis had at least a second a lap on everyone else in the field. KOV deciding not to get into a scrap with a 1 sec disadvantage with his team-mate knowing he is not able to challenge MAS & PIQ ahead is very different that ALO barely managing 1/10th pace advantage.

          I supposed MAS & PIQ also were given team orders to let HAM through in that race.

      2. Keith, you seem to have lost the “objectivity” test today.

        I am not a fan of team orders in F1 and I am against all of them, including McLaren’s.

      3. I’m pretty sure about McLaren not doing it, at least this year.
        But to me the Turkey incident sounded pretty much the same, only Mark didn’t allow it to happen. Even the teams first comments sound alike (being worried of the 3rd place guy closing in). And from what Vettel said to the BBC today about this move confirms it for me.

        But i am upset about this happening to Massa now as well. Even more as it would have been the perfect memorial of events on the same weekend last year.

    1. “Everyone does it, so why is it that when ferrari does it its cheating?”

      Because this is not racing and shouldn’t be allowed to continue. Ferrari have done it on numerous occasions, and so have a few other teams in the past, but it doesnt mean it is right or that it should be allowed in the sport. To manipulate the championship, the leader of the race and the winner of the race, and do so directly during the race is just plain and simple wrong.

      1. RBR totally did it in Turkey, just with a little more finesse. And Webber made it as difficult as possible for Vettel, as he should have since both were in contention for the championship. The fact that Vettel then muffed it up is of no consequence.

        Look, I didn’t like what happened, but I can understand it. Alonso is within shouting distance of being a WDC contender, Massa isn’t. If they’d done it a little less ham-fistedly, would there be all the outcry? Somehow I think not. We all knew it was just a matter of time before Alonso got in front of Massa by some means.

  8. keith i love this site,my best f1 site ever….
    ferrari this,ferrari that,mclaren have broken plenty of rules in the past,the comment said to massa alonso is faster than you………….i dont remember hearing massa move out the way cos your know where in the title,people believe what they want to,fact is there not running a billion pound team,it was a good race,

  9. poor Alonso… he doesn’t have a chance to prove how much faster than Massa he really is… don’t you think he also had orders, not to attack. how many times he was stuck behind teammate this year, but for the sake of the team he followed patiently. too bad ferrari screwed/was unlucky too much this year not to let drivers decide on the track who is faster (clearly Alonso). Felipe was lucky today on the start that Vettel held up Fernando and he took generous chunk of runoff tarmac (Kimmi Spa style) to take the lead

    1. This is a good point. There should be a penalty (not from the stewards, but a physical penalty, like grass) for running off the track. There used to be sand pits with deep ruts that ended drivers’ races. But no more!

  10. The correct result for Ferrari and the FIA. No other team benefited or lost any position as a result of their stupidity. Without being stupid about a penalty there was no other option.

    1. No other teams have been affected YET.

      If Alonso wins the Championship at the end of the year or another driver fails to beat Alonso at the end of the season because of a few points, then someone will be affected by this.

      $100k fine is a joke.

  11. Such bull from absolutely everyone at Ferrari. Alonso for being such a blatant hypocrite, Massa for not having the passion and guts to stand up for himself and then Smedly towing the company line.

    What the hell is Massa saying when ‘he did it for the team’? How did letting Alonso through benefit the team anymore than him not letting him through? A 1 2 is a 1 2 regardless of which driver is where.
    If anything this has severely damaged the team by injecting venom into its make-up.

    I’ve wanted to enjoy Alonso for such a long time. His antics with McLaren/Lewis tested that to the n’th degree but as a driver he is spectacular and I could accept his passionate desire to succeed.

    But this just stinks – giving it a run-around that would do a conservative politician proud just smacks of a total disregard for anyone but himself, regardless.

    A horrible little man…

  12. No ones denying its team orders, but to call it manipulated is a strong word. I dont see how it would be “manipulated” if it was a 1-2 in the bag anyway. Ok, so next time the director should come up with a better code than that. surprised they didnt just hold a meeting before the race discuss the situation, and say ok felipe, if he comes up behind you and you hold him up let him pass. Saves alot of contreversy and fighting.

  13. As a Ferrari fan, I feel let down by this result.

    Team orders do exist, we all know this. In fact, I would go as far as to say that the rule outlawing them should be removed. Transparency is always preferable.

    My distaste over this incident, and I think the public outrage caused, is simply a reflection of people’s innate sense of justice and fair play. It simply seems un-sportsman to award the victory to Fernando when his title chances are slim at best.

    This distaste is only compounded by the fact that Massa is one of the team’s grafters and it would have been poetic justice to see him get a race victory on the anniversary of his most frightening accident.

    As a passionate racer who is made or broken by his confidence and emotions, this incident will now be the nail in the coffin of Massa’s season.

    Team orders to decide a title are one thing; team orders when your fifth in the championship, have a slow development curve in comparison to the other teams and have been on the back foot since the second race of the season are completely disgusting.

    1. I am not a Ferrari fan, and them going back to their winning strategies of the 1997-2005 makes me even less so.

      But otherwise i think your pretty spot on.

      OK let them have team orders, but only in a limited set of circumstances. And it should be done openly, stating the intention even before the race and not with “saving fuel” or “brake/tyre problems” or pitstop strategy.

    2. I used to support Ferrari together with number of other teams. But no more after this. After all this time, Ferrari have simply shown that they are better at manipulating instead of competing. There is no justification as why they should switch winners given that Massa still has a chance on title and clearly it would have been a one-two anyhow.

      Once again, it is very likely that these decisions are probably being enforced by Montezemolo himself, or somebody higher on the ladder, and its getting old.

      1. in term of sports, i do not like this team order done by Massa/Alonso. In term of fairness, I really liked it since it raised this issue even higher. Previously everybody is just happy to see McLaren/RedBull doing team orders from pit strategy/ fuel saving. Disgusting…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>